The evidence-base for computer-based speech therapy for childhood speech sound disorders is somewhat limited1

Q2 Social Sciences
D. Ruscello
{"title":"The evidence-base for computer-based speech therapy for childhood speech sound disorders is somewhat limited1","authors":"D. Ruscello","doi":"10.1080/17489539.2019.1682800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data sources: The authors employed three different methods to identify relevant studies (Furlong, Erickson, and Morris, 2017). First, they conducted a literature search that included the following databases: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), ProQuest Central, Cochrane Library, AMED (Ovid), ERIC (ProQuest), Linguistics and Language (LLBA) and SCOPUS (Elsevier). Second, they carried out a hand search of potential data sources, which might publish studies of content interest. Finally, other researchers with an interest in the topic were consulted to identify any additional studies that may have been missed with the other two search strategies. Study selection and assessment: A multistep process was used to select the studies congruent with the author’s selection criteria. Initially, the first author reviewed all titles identified in the search. The abstracts of those studies were read by the author and an independent reviewer. If the abstract did not provide sufficient study detail, the full text was read by both reviewers. All studies were then read by both reviewers independently and an inter-judge agreement figure of 91.7% was computed for the joint selection of studies that met the operational definition utilized by the researchers. Lack of agreement was handled by consensus discussion. When consensus was not achieved, a third reviewer carried out an independent review and dialogue among reviewers was carried out to reach final consensus. A total of 14 studies were identified through the selection process with the studies conducted from 1991 to 2008.","PeriodicalId":39977,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","volume":"1 1","pages":"191 - 199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2019.1682800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data sources: The authors employed three different methods to identify relevant studies (Furlong, Erickson, and Morris, 2017). First, they conducted a literature search that included the following databases: Medline (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), EMBASE (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), ProQuest Central, Cochrane Library, AMED (Ovid), ERIC (ProQuest), Linguistics and Language (LLBA) and SCOPUS (Elsevier). Second, they carried out a hand search of potential data sources, which might publish studies of content interest. Finally, other researchers with an interest in the topic were consulted to identify any additional studies that may have been missed with the other two search strategies. Study selection and assessment: A multistep process was used to select the studies congruent with the author’s selection criteria. Initially, the first author reviewed all titles identified in the search. The abstracts of those studies were read by the author and an independent reviewer. If the abstract did not provide sufficient study detail, the full text was read by both reviewers. All studies were then read by both reviewers independently and an inter-judge agreement figure of 91.7% was computed for the joint selection of studies that met the operational definition utilized by the researchers. Lack of agreement was handled by consensus discussion. When consensus was not achieved, a third reviewer carried out an independent review and dialogue among reviewers was carried out to reach final consensus. A total of 14 studies were identified through the selection process with the studies conducted from 1991 to 2008.
基于计算机的儿童语音障碍言语治疗的证据基础有些有限
数据来源:作者采用三种不同的方法来识别相关研究(Furlong, Erickson, and Morris, 2017)。首先,他们进行了文献检索,包括以下数据库:Medline (Ovid)、CINAHL (Ebsco)、EMBASE (Ovid)、PsycINFO (Ovid)、ProQuest Central、Cochrane Library、AMED (Ovid)、ERIC (ProQuest)、Linguistics and Language (LLBA)和SCOPUS (Elsevier)。其次,他们对潜在的数据源进行了手工搜索,这些数据源可能会发表关于内容兴趣的研究。最后,咨询了对该主题感兴趣的其他研究人员,以确定其他两种搜索策略可能错过的任何其他研究。研究选择和评估:采用多步骤的过程来选择符合作者选择标准的研究。最初,第一作者审阅了搜索中确定的所有标题。这些研究的摘要由作者和一名独立审稿人阅读。如果摘要没有提供足够的研究细节,则由两位审稿人阅读全文。然后,所有研究都由两位审稿人独立阅读,对于符合研究人员使用的操作定义的联合选择研究,计算出91.7%的审稿人间一致性数字。缺乏一致意见是通过协商一致的讨论来处理的。当没有达成共识时,由第三位审稿人进行独立审查,审稿人之间进行对话以达成最终共识。从1991年到2008年,通过选择过程共确定了14项研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention
Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention (EBCAI) brings together professionals who work in clinical and educational practice as well as researchers from all disciplines to promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in serving individuals with communication impairments. The primary aims of EBCAI are to: Promote evidence-based practice (EBP) in communication assessment and intervention; Appraise the latest and best communication assessment and intervention studies so as to facilitate the use of research findings in clinical and educational practice; Provide a forum for discussions that advance EBP; and Disseminate research on EBP. We target speech-language pathologists, special educators, regular educators, applied behavior analysts, clinical psychologists, physical therapists, and occupational therapists who serve children or adults with communication impairments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信