Can Principles of “Good Practice in Assessment” Work within Higher Education?: A Case Study of an Interdepartmental Assessment Exchange Project

Q4 Social Sciences
Mary E. Yakimowski, Michael P. Alfano
{"title":"Can Principles of “Good Practice in Assessment” Work within Higher Education?: A Case Study of an Interdepartmental Assessment Exchange Project","authors":"Mary E. Yakimowski, Michael P. Alfano","doi":"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.2.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This action study embraces Stassen’s four principles for good practice in assessment in higher education by involving candidates of two programs—a teacher preparation program and an administrator preparation program—collaborating on an assessment project. Preservice teachers submitted “authentic” artifacts from their student-teaching experience (e.g., a videotaped lesson), while aspiring school leaders provided a detailed analysis using an assessment rubric. Results and lessons learned from this type of collaborative assessment are shared. The authors conclude by offering a model regarding how the four principles of best practice can be embedded in an assessment project that facilitates student learning.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"145 1","pages":"105 - 77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.3.2.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This action study embraces Stassen’s four principles for good practice in assessment in higher education by involving candidates of two programs—a teacher preparation program and an administrator preparation program—collaborating on an assessment project. Preservice teachers submitted “authentic” artifacts from their student-teaching experience (e.g., a videotaped lesson), while aspiring school leaders provided a detailed analysis using an assessment rubric. Results and lessons learned from this type of collaborative assessment are shared. The authors conclude by offering a model regarding how the four principles of best practice can be embedded in an assessment project that facilitates student learning.
“良好评核实践”原则能否适用于高等教育?:一个跨部门评估交流项目的案例研究
这项行动研究采纳了Stassen提出的高等教育评估中良好实践的四项原则,让两个项目(教师准备项目和管理人员准备项目)的候选人合作开展评估项目。职前教师提交了他们学生教学经历中的“真实”作品(例如,录像课程),而有抱负的学校领导则使用评估标准提供了详细的分析。从这种类型的协作评估中获得的结果和经验教训是共享的。最后,作者提供了一个关于如何将最佳实践的四项原则嵌入到促进学生学习的评估项目中的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信