Cognitive biases are associated with aberrant salience experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders

0 PSYCHIATRY
{"title":"Cognitive biases are associated with aberrant salience experience in schizophrenia spectrum disorders","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sjpmh.2023.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Cognitive models suggest the co-occurrence of cognitive biases and aberrant salience is unique to psychosis, but their interaction is not yet fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between subjective cognitive biases and aberrant salience in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A sample of 92 subjects with SSDs underwent an assessment using Davos Assessment Cognitive Biases (DACOBS) and the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) in a cross-sectional design. We evaluated psychopathological differences based on ASI scores and conducted a linear regression analysis to examine the variables associated with aberrant salience.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Subjects with an ASI score ≥14 demonstrated significantly higher scores across all subscales and total score of ASI and DACOBS (<em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001). ASI subscales were significantly positive correlated with all DACOBS subscales, ranging from 0.250 for Increased Significance and Safety Behavior to 0.679 for Heightened Emotionality and Social cognition problems. The linear regression analysis revealed a positive association between aberrant salience and the DACOBS subscales jumping to conclusions (JTC) (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.220), social cognition problems (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.442), subjective cognitive problems (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.405), and a negative association with the subscale belief inflexibility (<em>β</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−0.350).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings suggest that JTC, social cognition problems and subjective cognitive problems may play a central role in the experience of aberrant salience in individuals with SSDs. This work informs about the need of developing prevention and intervention strategies that specifically target cognitive biases and aberrant salience in the treatment of psychosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101179,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 154-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323000054/pdfft?md5=7e61cf1e519c4340871e4934bc863454&pid=1-s2.0-S2950285323000054-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychiatry and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950285323000054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Cognitive models suggest the co-occurrence of cognitive biases and aberrant salience is unique to psychosis, but their interaction is not yet fully understood. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the relationship between subjective cognitive biases and aberrant salience in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) in this study.

Methods

A sample of 92 subjects with SSDs underwent an assessment using Davos Assessment Cognitive Biases (DACOBS) and the Aberrant Salience Inventory (ASI) in a cross-sectional design. We evaluated psychopathological differences based on ASI scores and conducted a linear regression analysis to examine the variables associated with aberrant salience.

Results

Subjects with an ASI score ≥14 demonstrated significantly higher scores across all subscales and total score of ASI and DACOBS (p < 0.001). ASI subscales were significantly positive correlated with all DACOBS subscales, ranging from 0.250 for Increased Significance and Safety Behavior to 0.679 for Heightened Emotionality and Social cognition problems. The linear regression analysis revealed a positive association between aberrant salience and the DACOBS subscales jumping to conclusions (JTC) (β = 0.220), social cognition problems (β = 0.442), subjective cognitive problems (β = 0.405), and a negative association with the subscale belief inflexibility (β = −0.350).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that JTC, social cognition problems and subjective cognitive problems may play a central role in the experience of aberrant salience in individuals with SSDs. This work informs about the need of developing prevention and intervention strategies that specifically target cognitive biases and aberrant salience in the treatment of psychosis.

认知偏差与精神分裂症谱系障碍的异常显著性体验有关。
简介认知模型表明,认知偏差和异常显著性的同时存在是精神病所特有的,但它们之间的相互作用尚未完全明了。因此,我们在本研究中旨在阐明精神分裂症谱系障碍(SSDs)患者的主观认知偏差与异常显著性之间的关系:92名精神分裂症谱系障碍受试者接受了达沃斯认知偏差评估(DACOBS)和异常显著性量表(ASI)的横断面评估。我们根据 ASI 分数评估了心理病理学差异,并进行了线性回归分析,以研究与异常突出相关的变量:结果:ASI 得分≥14 分的受试者在 ASI 和 DACOBS 的所有分量表和总分上的得分都明显较高(p 结论:我们的研究结果表明,JTC、社交和心理障碍与异常突出相关:我们的研究结果表明,JTC、社会认知问题和主观认知问题可能在 SSD 患者的异常显著性体验中起着核心作用。这项研究表明,在治疗精神病时,有必要制定专门针对认知偏差和异常显著性的预防和干预策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信