How does the Facebook Algorithm rank the contents according to the interaction buttons?

Dávid Pócs
{"title":"How does the Facebook Algorithm rank the contents according to the interaction buttons?","authors":"Dávid Pócs","doi":"10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.ppou7f9.v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Objective: This research aimed at understanding how social media contents are ranked by the Facebook Algorithm according to interaction buttons. Thecorrelations between Facebook users' interactions and the organic reach of the given content canhelp to gain this aim. \n \n \n \n Methods: We included 1025 non-paid, Facebook posts (N=1025). We collected thefollowing data in the post level. “Organic reach” is the number of people who saw the given non-paid content. The organicreach consisted of “fanreach” and “non-fan reach” according to previous “pagelike” activity. Theinvestigated interaction data was thefollowing: “Facebook reactions” (e.g., “like”); “shares”; “comments”; “clicks”; and “negative Facebook interactions” (e.g.,posthides).\n \n \n \n Results: A significant negative correlation was found between organic reach and “like” reaction. We observed the strongest significant positive correlations of organic reach with “comments”, “haha” and “love” reactions. Furthermore, fanreach correlated positively with “comments”, “haha” and “love” reactions, while non-fan reach correlated positively with “shares” and “clicks”.\n \n \n \n Conclusions: Some interactions on a post level can have higher priority in content ranking: “comments”, “haha”, “love”, and “sad” reactions. This study has shown that “like” reactions and “shares” can have a lower priority in content ranking. Our results suggest that a further categorization to fan-specific interactions (“haha” and “love”reactions, “comments”) and non-fan-specific interactions (“shares” and “clicks”) is needed. Finally, „shares” can generate more non-fans, however, “shares” can result in fewer fans. Thisexploratory research offers animportant insight into the Facebook content ranking for public health professionals who design Facebook-based interventions.","PeriodicalId":21568,"journal":{"name":"ScienceOpen Posters","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScienceOpen Posters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14293/s2199-1006.1.sor-.ppou7f9.v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research aimed at understanding how social media contents are ranked by the Facebook Algorithm according to interaction buttons. Thecorrelations between Facebook users' interactions and the organic reach of the given content canhelp to gain this aim. Methods: We included 1025 non-paid, Facebook posts (N=1025). We collected thefollowing data in the post level. “Organic reach” is the number of people who saw the given non-paid content. The organicreach consisted of “fanreach” and “non-fan reach” according to previous “pagelike” activity. Theinvestigated interaction data was thefollowing: “Facebook reactions” (e.g., “like”); “shares”; “comments”; “clicks”; and “negative Facebook interactions” (e.g.,posthides). Results: A significant negative correlation was found between organic reach and “like” reaction. We observed the strongest significant positive correlations of organic reach with “comments”, “haha” and “love” reactions. Furthermore, fanreach correlated positively with “comments”, “haha” and “love” reactions, while non-fan reach correlated positively with “shares” and “clicks”. Conclusions: Some interactions on a post level can have higher priority in content ranking: “comments”, “haha”, “love”, and “sad” reactions. This study has shown that “like” reactions and “shares” can have a lower priority in content ranking. Our results suggest that a further categorization to fan-specific interactions (“haha” and “love”reactions, “comments”) and non-fan-specific interactions (“shares” and “clicks”) is needed. Finally, „shares” can generate more non-fans, however, “shares” can result in fewer fans. Thisexploratory research offers animportant insight into the Facebook content ranking for public health professionals who design Facebook-based interventions.
Facebook算法如何根据交互按钮对内容进行排名?
目的:本研究旨在了解Facebook算法如何根据交互按钮对社交媒体内容进行排名。Facebook用户互动与给定内容的有机传播之间的关系有助于实现这一目标。方法:我们纳入了1025篇非付费的Facebook帖子(N=1025)。我们在岗位层面收集了以下数据。“有机接触”指的是看到非付费内容的人数。根据之前的“类似页面”活动,有机接触包括“粉丝接触”和“非粉丝接触”。调查的互动数据如下:“Facebook反应”(例如,“喜欢”);“股票”;“评论”;“点击”;以及“消极的Facebook互动”(如帖子)。结果:有机伸展与“like”反应呈显著负相关。我们观察到有机接触率与“评论”、“哈哈”和“爱”反应之间最显著的正相关。此外,粉丝覆盖范围与“评论”、“哈哈”和“喜欢”反应正相关,而非粉丝覆盖范围与“分享”和“点击”正相关。结论:帖子层面的一些互动可以在内容排名中拥有更高的优先级:“评论”、“哈哈”、“爱”和“悲伤”的反应。这项研究表明,“喜欢”反应和“分享”在内容排名中的优先级可能较低。我们的研究结果表明,需要对粉丝特定的互动(“哈哈”和“喜欢”的反应,“评论”)和非粉丝特定的互动(“分享”和“点击”)进行进一步的分类。最后,“分享”可以产生更多的非粉丝,然而,“分享”可以导致更少的粉丝。这项探索性研究为设计基于Facebook的干预措施的公共卫生专业人员提供了关于Facebook内容排名的重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信