Cycling infrastructures and equity: an examination of bike lanes and bike sharing system in Lisbon, Portugal

Miguel Padeiro
{"title":"Cycling infrastructures and equity: an examination of bike lanes and bike sharing system in Lisbon, Portugal","authors":"Miguel Padeiro","doi":"10.1080/23748834.2022.2084589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Inequity of access to the cycling network may reinforce social disparities in health and access to resources and opportunities. This study aims to examine whether the area-level material deprivation index is associated with different levels of accessibility to Lisbon’s (i) cycling network and (ii) bike-sharing docking stations network. Independent t-tests were implemented, and regression models were performed to estimate the associations of the multiple deprivation index with each dependent bike lane and bike-sharing docking station variable, adjusting for covariates. The results confirm the hypothesis of a significant difference between the most and least deprived areas in terms of the presence of bike lanes and bike-sharing stations as well as in terms of coverage, distance, and connectivity of the both infrastructures. When covariates are controlled, a higher index of material deprivation is associated with (i) a lower presence of, greater distance to, and lower coverage of bike-sharing docking stations; and (ii) is not associated with the presence of, distance to, connectivity of, and coverage of cycle lane networks. Based on these findings, efforts should be directed to increase access to bike lanes and bike-sharing systems to more deprived areas.","PeriodicalId":72596,"journal":{"name":"Cities & health","volume":"1 1","pages":"729 - 743"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cities & health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23748834.2022.2084589","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

ABSTRACT Inequity of access to the cycling network may reinforce social disparities in health and access to resources and opportunities. This study aims to examine whether the area-level material deprivation index is associated with different levels of accessibility to Lisbon’s (i) cycling network and (ii) bike-sharing docking stations network. Independent t-tests were implemented, and regression models were performed to estimate the associations of the multiple deprivation index with each dependent bike lane and bike-sharing docking station variable, adjusting for covariates. The results confirm the hypothesis of a significant difference between the most and least deprived areas in terms of the presence of bike lanes and bike-sharing stations as well as in terms of coverage, distance, and connectivity of the both infrastructures. When covariates are controlled, a higher index of material deprivation is associated with (i) a lower presence of, greater distance to, and lower coverage of bike-sharing docking stations; and (ii) is not associated with the presence of, distance to, connectivity of, and coverage of cycle lane networks. Based on these findings, efforts should be directed to increase access to bike lanes and bike-sharing systems to more deprived areas.
自行车基础设施和公平:对葡萄牙里斯本自行车道和自行车共享系统的考察
进入自行车网络的不公平可能会加剧健康和获得资源和机会的社会差距。本研究旨在研究区域级物质剥夺指数是否与里斯本(i)自行车网络和(ii)共享自行车停靠站网络的不同可达性水平相关。采用独立t检验,建立回归模型,估计多重剥夺指数与每个依赖的自行车道和共享单车停靠站变量之间的关联,并对协变量进行调整。研究结果证实了最贫困地区和最贫困地区在自行车道和共享单车站的存在以及这两种基础设施的覆盖范围、距离和连通性方面存在显著差异的假设。当控制协变量时,较高的物质剥夺指数与以下因素相关:(1)共享单车停靠站的存在率较低、距离较远、覆盖范围较低;(ii)与自行车道网络的存在、距离、连通性和覆盖范围无关。基于这些发现,应该努力在更贫困的地区增加自行车道和自行车共享系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信