Three-Dimensional (3D) Morphometric Analysis of Plegic and Healthy Feet of Patients with Stroke

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mehmet Karagulle, Yilmaz Yildirim, Umut Ozsoy, Lütfi Süzen, Hatice IKIZLER MAY
{"title":"Three-Dimensional (3D) Morphometric Analysis of Plegic and Healthy Feet of Patients with Stroke","authors":"Mehmet Karagulle, Yilmaz Yildirim, Umut Ozsoy, Lütfi Süzen, Hatice IKIZLER MAY","doi":"10.58600/eurjther1701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the changes in foot morphology in stroke patients using 3D scanning and focused on parameters like foot volume, area, and the root mean square difference (RMS) values. The objective was to enhance our understanding of post-stroke foot morphology and its potential relevance for rehabilitation, especially in designing orthotic supports and specialized footwear for stroke patients.\nMethods: Our study involved fourteen right hemiplegia patients and twenty healthy subjects. Stroke patients were assessed using international scales. We utilized a 3D scanning device to digitize and examine the differences in foot morphology between hemiplegic and healthy subjects, analyzing the data on a computer platform.\nResults: In the context of post-stroke individuals with hemiplegic feet, our morphometric analysis revealed notable differences in foot area and foot volume when compared to their healthy counterparts. These distinctions extended to linear measurements encompassing foot length, foot width, instep height, bimalleolar width, and ball width. Significantly, RMS exhibited a substantial increase in the patient cohort compared to the healthy group (p<0.05). Our investigation also established correlations between these standing morphometric parameters and RMS alterations, with noteworthy coefficients for various parameters: RMS(Foot Length Difference, 0.41), RMS(Foot Width Difference, 0.45), RMS(Instep Height Difference, 0.58), RMS(Ball Width Difference, 0.58), RMS(Bimalleolar Width Difference, 0.19), RMS(Volume Difference, 0.74), and RMS(Area Difference, 0.62).\nConclusion: This study suggests incorporating RMS values as a novel parameter in the evaluation process. We anticipate that these findings will have practical implications, particularly in designing orthotic supports, specialized footwear for stroke patients, and the formulation of tailored rehabilitation programs within clinical settings.","PeriodicalId":42642,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Therapeutics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantitatively assess the changes in foot morphology in stroke patients using 3D scanning and focused on parameters like foot volume, area, and the root mean square difference (RMS) values. The objective was to enhance our understanding of post-stroke foot morphology and its potential relevance for rehabilitation, especially in designing orthotic supports and specialized footwear for stroke patients. Methods: Our study involved fourteen right hemiplegia patients and twenty healthy subjects. Stroke patients were assessed using international scales. We utilized a 3D scanning device to digitize and examine the differences in foot morphology between hemiplegic and healthy subjects, analyzing the data on a computer platform. Results: In the context of post-stroke individuals with hemiplegic feet, our morphometric analysis revealed notable differences in foot area and foot volume when compared to their healthy counterparts. These distinctions extended to linear measurements encompassing foot length, foot width, instep height, bimalleolar width, and ball width. Significantly, RMS exhibited a substantial increase in the patient cohort compared to the healthy group (p<0.05). Our investigation also established correlations between these standing morphometric parameters and RMS alterations, with noteworthy coefficients for various parameters: RMS(Foot Length Difference, 0.41), RMS(Foot Width Difference, 0.45), RMS(Instep Height Difference, 0.58), RMS(Ball Width Difference, 0.58), RMS(Bimalleolar Width Difference, 0.19), RMS(Volume Difference, 0.74), and RMS(Area Difference, 0.62). Conclusion: This study suggests incorporating RMS values as a novel parameter in the evaluation process. We anticipate that these findings will have practical implications, particularly in designing orthotic supports, specialized footwear for stroke patients, and the formulation of tailored rehabilitation programs within clinical settings.
脑卒中患者瘫痪与健康足部的三维形态计量学分析
目的:本研究旨在通过三维扫描定量评估脑卒中患者足部形态学的变化,重点关注足部体积、面积、均方根差(RMS)值等参数。目的是提高我们对脑卒中后足部形态及其与康复的潜在相关性的理解,特别是在为脑卒中患者设计矫形支持和专用鞋类方面。方法:选取14例右偏瘫患者和20例正常人作为研究对象。采用国际标准对脑卒中患者进行评估。我们利用3D扫描设备数字化并检查偏瘫和健康受试者的足部形态差异,并在计算机平台上分析数据。结果:在中风后偏瘫足患者的情况下,我们的形态计量学分析显示,与健康人相比,他们的足面积和足体积有显著差异。这些区别扩展到线性测量,包括脚长、脚宽、脚背高度、双踝宽度和球宽。值得注意的是,与健康组相比,患者队列的RMS显着增加(p<0.05)。我们的调查还建立了这些站立形态测量参数与RMS变化之间的相关性,其中各参数的系数值得注意:RMS(脚长差,0.41)、RMS(脚宽差,0.45)、RMS(脚背高度差,0.58)、RMS(球宽差,0.58)、RMS(双踝宽差,0.19)、RMS(体积差,0.74)和RMS(面积差,0.62)。结论:本研究建议将均方根值作为一种新的评价参数。我们预计这些发现将具有实际意义,特别是在为中风患者设计矫形支持、专门的鞋类以及在临床环境中制定量身定制的康复计划方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Therapeutics
European Journal of Therapeutics MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信