Perspective - Rethinking Teams: From Bounded Membership to Dynamic Participation

M. Mortensen, M. Haas
{"title":"Perspective - Rethinking Teams: From Bounded Membership to Dynamic Participation","authors":"M. Mortensen, M. Haas","doi":"10.1287/orsc.2017.1198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teams have long been defined by boundedness-a clear distinction between members and nonmembers. Yet as we argue in this perspective paper, the distinction between members and nonmembers is often blurred in today's teams, as a result of trends toward increasing team fluidity, overlap, and dispersion. These trends offer potential organizational benefits, but the resulting boundary blurring can undermine team effectiveness. Moreover, boundary blurring calls into question many of the basic assumptions underpinning our theoretical and empirical research on teams. Accordingly, it is time to rethink our fundamental conceptualization of teams and to revisit our approaches to studying them. We propose a shift from viewing teams as clearly bounded groups of members toward instead viewing teams as dynamic hubs of participants. Reconceptualizing teams in this way opens up new avenues for theory development and offers important implications for future empirical research on teams.","PeriodicalId":93599,"journal":{"name":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","volume":"51 1","pages":"341-355"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization science (Providence, R.I.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Teams have long been defined by boundedness-a clear distinction between members and nonmembers. Yet as we argue in this perspective paper, the distinction between members and nonmembers is often blurred in today's teams, as a result of trends toward increasing team fluidity, overlap, and dispersion. These trends offer potential organizational benefits, but the resulting boundary blurring can undermine team effectiveness. Moreover, boundary blurring calls into question many of the basic assumptions underpinning our theoretical and empirical research on teams. Accordingly, it is time to rethink our fundamental conceptualization of teams and to revisit our approaches to studying them. We propose a shift from viewing teams as clearly bounded groups of members toward instead viewing teams as dynamic hubs of participants. Reconceptualizing teams in this way opens up new avenues for theory development and offers important implications for future empirical research on teams.
视角——重新思考团队:从有限成员到动态参与
长期以来,团队的定义都是有界限的——明确区分成员和非成员。然而,正如我们在这篇观点论文中所论证的那样,在今天的团队中,成员和非成员之间的区别往往是模糊的,这是团队流动性、重叠和分散增加的趋势的结果。这些趋势提供了潜在的组织利益,但由此产生的边界模糊可能会破坏团队的效率。此外,边界模糊使我们对支持团队理论和实证研究的许多基本假设产生了疑问。因此,是时候重新思考我们对团队的基本概念,并重新审视我们研究团队的方法了。我们建议从将团队视为明确限定的成员群体转向将团队视为参与者的动态中心。以这种方式重新定义团队为理论发展开辟了新的途径,并为未来的团队实证研究提供了重要的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信