Endobronchial/ Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination and Rapid On-Site Evaluation- Experience In A UK Centre

P. Shetty, R. Mogal, A. Barlow, A. Maddox
{"title":"Endobronchial/ Endoscopic Ultrasound Examination and Rapid On-Site Evaluation- Experience In A UK Centre","authors":"P. Shetty, R. Mogal, A. Barlow, A. Maddox","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) / Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential investigation tool in lung malignancy. In our centre we use Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), which is performed by our Cytopathology team comprising a trained Biomedical Scientist and, a Cytopathologist, allows rapid assessment of adequacy, provisional diagnosis and appropriate triage of EBUS/EUS specimens. We have audited our data in our centre since the establishment of EBUS/EUS TBNA and ROSE. Methods and Results: We present here a cohort of patients with suspected lung malignancy who underwent EBUS /EUS TBNA and ROSE in our centre between from October 2013 to June 2018. A total of 295 aspirates sites from 249 patients with suspected lung malignancy were collected during this period. Mean number passes for diagnoses on ROSE was 1.4 and mean number of total nodal passes was 3.2. Mean number of nodal sites biopsied per patient was 1.18. In 253 aspirates, malignancy was confirmed as per initial ROSE assessment. 34 aspirates were suggestive of malignancy, 4 aspirates were equivocal and 4 were assessed as benign, and the final outcome of these aspirates were malignant on cell block. 26 of these patients had Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of cytological samples and we had a success rate of 21 /26 ( 77%). 5 patient had repeat procedure for molecular analysis. Conclusion: EBUS/EUS with ROSE is effective in achieving diagnoses with fewer needle passes and reduces inadequate rate and therefore the need for repeat procedures. The samples obtained with the aid of ROSE can be maximised so that the majority of the sample can be made into a cell block for further studies.","PeriodicalId":93455,"journal":{"name":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional pulmonology (Middletown, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa4779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) / Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) has become an essential investigation tool in lung malignancy. In our centre we use Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), which is performed by our Cytopathology team comprising a trained Biomedical Scientist and, a Cytopathologist, allows rapid assessment of adequacy, provisional diagnosis and appropriate triage of EBUS/EUS specimens. We have audited our data in our centre since the establishment of EBUS/EUS TBNA and ROSE. Methods and Results: We present here a cohort of patients with suspected lung malignancy who underwent EBUS /EUS TBNA and ROSE in our centre between from October 2013 to June 2018. A total of 295 aspirates sites from 249 patients with suspected lung malignancy were collected during this period. Mean number passes for diagnoses on ROSE was 1.4 and mean number of total nodal passes was 3.2. Mean number of nodal sites biopsied per patient was 1.18. In 253 aspirates, malignancy was confirmed as per initial ROSE assessment. 34 aspirates were suggestive of malignancy, 4 aspirates were equivocal and 4 were assessed as benign, and the final outcome of these aspirates were malignant on cell block. 26 of these patients had Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of cytological samples and we had a success rate of 21 /26 ( 77%). 5 patient had repeat procedure for molecular analysis. Conclusion: EBUS/EUS with ROSE is effective in achieving diagnoses with fewer needle passes and reduces inadequate rate and therefore the need for repeat procedures. The samples obtained with the aid of ROSE can be maximised so that the majority of the sample can be made into a cell block for further studies.
支气管内/内窥镜超声检查和快速现场评估-英国中心的经验
支气管超声(EBUS) /内镜超声(EUS)已成为肺部恶性肿瘤必不可少的检查工具。在我们的中心,我们使用快速现场评估(ROSE),由我们的细胞病理学团队执行,该团队由一名训练有素的生物医学科学家和一名细胞病理学家组成,可以快速评估EBUS/EUS标本的充分性、临时诊断和适当分诊。自EBUS/EUS TBNA和ROSE成立以来,我们对我们中心的数据进行了审计。方法和结果:我们在此介绍了2013年10月至2018年6月期间在我们中心接受EBUS /EUS TBNA和ROSE治疗的疑似肺恶性肿瘤患者队列。在此期间共收集了249例疑似肺恶性肿瘤患者的295个吸痰部位。ROSE诊断的平均通过次数为1.4次,总淋巴结平均通过次数为3.2次。每位患者平均活检淋巴结数为1.18个。在253例抽吸中,根据最初的ROSE评估,恶性肿瘤被确认。34例提示恶性,4例含糊不清,4例良性,最终细胞阻滞结果为恶性。其中26例患者进行了细胞学样本的下一代测序(NGS),成功率为21 /26(77%)。5例患者重复进行分子分析。结论:EBUS/EUS联合ROSE能够有效地减少针道次数,减少不充分率,从而减少重复手术的需要。借助ROSE获得的样品可以最大化,以便大部分样品可以制成细胞块以供进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信