Risk factors of late onset sepsis caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) - producing bacteria in preterm infants

IF 0.2 Q4 PEDIATRICS
I. Ratridewi, S. L. Winaputri, E. Sulistijono, F. Juniantika
{"title":"Risk factors of late onset sepsis caused by extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) - producing bacteria in preterm infants","authors":"I. Ratridewi, S. L. Winaputri, E. Sulistijono, F. Juniantika","doi":"10.14238/pi63.1sup.2023.21-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background High incidence of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants contributes to neonatal morbidity. Therapeutic outcomes of LOS have deteriorated as a result of increased antibiotic resistance problems, mainly from ESBL isolates. Controlling risk factors is important in reducing morbidity and mortality as well as providing guidance for antibiotic selection. \nObjectives To determine the risk factors of LOS due to ESBL-producing bacteria in preterm infants. \nMethods This is a retrospective study. The inclusion criteria was neonates diagnosed with late-onset neonatal sepsis by clinical signs and a positive blood culture. The blood culture result and characteristics patients as secondary data were extracted from medical records within the hospital facilities and the institutional database of the Neonatology Department of Universitas Brawijaya (January 2019 to March 2021). Statistical analysis was done to compare characteristics of the patients in the ESBL positive group to those in the ESBL negative group to assess the potential risk factors. \nResults Among 124 preterm infants with LOS, 62 of them were ESBL-positive case subjects and the other 62 were non-ESBL-producing control subjects. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogens identified, with 96% (n=59) of them being the ESBL-producing strain, predominated by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=56). Factors significantly correlated with the occurrence of LOS-ESBL included prior history of invasive procedures (OR 3.13; 95%CI 1.45 to 6.73; P=0.00), central access insertion (OR 9.54; 95%CI 3.7 to 24.2; P=0.00), and parenteral nutrition (OR 6.03; 95%CI 2.77 to 13.16; P=0.00). Central access insertion had the strongest influence (Exp(B) 6.98; P= 0.00). \nConclusion Prior invasive procedures, central access insertion, and parenteral nutrition had significant correlations with the occurrence of LOS-ESBL in preterm infants. Central access insertion is a predictive factor for LOS-ESBL.","PeriodicalId":19660,"journal":{"name":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatrica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14238/pi63.1sup.2023.21-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background High incidence of late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants contributes to neonatal morbidity. Therapeutic outcomes of LOS have deteriorated as a result of increased antibiotic resistance problems, mainly from ESBL isolates. Controlling risk factors is important in reducing morbidity and mortality as well as providing guidance for antibiotic selection. Objectives To determine the risk factors of LOS due to ESBL-producing bacteria in preterm infants. Methods This is a retrospective study. The inclusion criteria was neonates diagnosed with late-onset neonatal sepsis by clinical signs and a positive blood culture. The blood culture result and characteristics patients as secondary data were extracted from medical records within the hospital facilities and the institutional database of the Neonatology Department of Universitas Brawijaya (January 2019 to March 2021). Statistical analysis was done to compare characteristics of the patients in the ESBL positive group to those in the ESBL negative group to assess the potential risk factors. Results Among 124 preterm infants with LOS, 62 of them were ESBL-positive case subjects and the other 62 were non-ESBL-producing control subjects. Gram-negative bacteria were the most common pathogens identified, with 96% (n=59) of them being the ESBL-producing strain, predominated by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n=56). Factors significantly correlated with the occurrence of LOS-ESBL included prior history of invasive procedures (OR 3.13; 95%CI 1.45 to 6.73; P=0.00), central access insertion (OR 9.54; 95%CI 3.7 to 24.2; P=0.00), and parenteral nutrition (OR 6.03; 95%CI 2.77 to 13.16; P=0.00). Central access insertion had the strongest influence (Exp(B) 6.98; P= 0.00). Conclusion Prior invasive procedures, central access insertion, and parenteral nutrition had significant correlations with the occurrence of LOS-ESBL in preterm infants. Central access insertion is a predictive factor for LOS-ESBL.
早产婴儿延谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)产生细菌引起的晚发型脓毒症的危险因素
背景:迟发性脓毒症(LOS)在早产儿中的高发是新生儿发病率的重要因素。由于主要来自ESBL分离株的抗生素耐药性问题增加,LOS的治疗结果恶化。控制危险因素对于降低发病率和死亡率以及为抗生素选择提供指导具有重要意义。目的探讨产esbl细菌引起早产儿LOS的危险因素。方法回顾性研究。纳入标准是通过临床症状和血培养阳性诊断为晚发型新生儿败血症的新生儿。血培养结果和特征患者作为次要数据提取自医院设施内的医疗记录和布拉维贾亚大学新生儿科机构数据库(2019年1月至2021年3月)。比较ESBL阳性组和ESBL阴性组患者的特征,进行统计学分析,评估潜在的危险因素。结果124例LOS早产儿中,62例为esbl阳性,62例为不产生esbl的对照组。革兰氏阴性菌是最常见的致病菌,其中96% (n=59)为产esbl菌株,以肺炎克雷伯菌(n=56)为主。与LOS-ESBL发生显著相关的因素包括有创手术史(OR 3.13;95%可信区间1.45 ~ 6.73;P=0.00),中心接入插入(OR 9.54;95%CI 3.7 ~ 24.2;P=0.00)和肠外营养(OR 6.03;95%可信区间2.77 ~ 13.16;P = 0.00)。中心通路插入影响最大(Exp(B) 6.98;P = 0.00)。结论既往有创手术、中心通路插入和肠外营养与早产儿LOS-ESBL的发生有显著相关性。中心通路插入是LOS-ESBL的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信