{"title":"Pre Clinic Grade and Clinic Periods Effect on Progress Test of UNISMA Medical Profession Students","authors":"Ariani Ratri Dewi","doi":"10.33086/MHSJ.V5I1.1880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Pre clinic grade point is often seen as predictor of good performance in professional education whose short term goal is to pass national examination which command progress test to evaluate the preparation.\nPurpose: To know the effect of pre clinic grade point and clinical study periods in progress test result of medical profession students.\nMethods: 135 students of medical profession programme completed computer based progress test of 200 national standardized questions in 200 minutes using siPENA software. Progress test result then analysed based on how long they have been studied and their pre clinic grade point using ANOVA – Tukey HSD and Pearson correlation in SPSS for Windows ver 19\nResults: Although students with pre clinic grade 2,50-2,74 have lower progress test result, but it’s not statistically significant (p>0,05). The same happen in clinic study periods with the longer the students in their clinical rotation, the better their result (p>0,05). The trends which showing better result in higher pre clinic grade point and time they spend in clinical rotation agrees with previous studies.\nConclusion: Pre clinic grade point and clinic study periods has little to no effect on progress test result of medical profession students in UNISMA.","PeriodicalId":18554,"journal":{"name":"Medical and Health Science Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"14-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical and Health Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33086/MHSJ.V5I1.1880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Pre clinic grade point is often seen as predictor of good performance in professional education whose short term goal is to pass national examination which command progress test to evaluate the preparation.
Purpose: To know the effect of pre clinic grade point and clinical study periods in progress test result of medical profession students.
Methods: 135 students of medical profession programme completed computer based progress test of 200 national standardized questions in 200 minutes using siPENA software. Progress test result then analysed based on how long they have been studied and their pre clinic grade point using ANOVA – Tukey HSD and Pearson correlation in SPSS for Windows ver 19
Results: Although students with pre clinic grade 2,50-2,74 have lower progress test result, but it’s not statistically significant (p>0,05). The same happen in clinic study periods with the longer the students in their clinical rotation, the better their result (p>0,05). The trends which showing better result in higher pre clinic grade point and time they spend in clinical rotation agrees with previous studies.
Conclusion: Pre clinic grade point and clinic study periods has little to no effect on progress test result of medical profession students in UNISMA.
在以通过国家考试为短期目标的专业教育中,临床前成绩通常被视为良好表现的预测指标。目的:了解临床前学习成绩和临床学习时间对医学专业学生进步测试结果的影响。方法:135名医学专业学生用siPENA软件在200分钟内完成200道国家标准化题的计算机进度测试。在SPSS for Windows ver 19中,利用ANOVA - Tukey HSD和Pearson相关对学习时间和临床前成绩进行分析。结果:临床前成绩为2,50-2,74的学生虽然在临床前成绩为2,74的学生的进步测试成绩较低,但差异无统计学意义(p> 0.05)。临床轮转时间越长,学习效果越好(p> 0.05)。临床前分级点越高,临床轮转时间越长,结果越好,这与以往的研究结果一致。结论:临床前成绩和临床学习时间对医学专业学生进步测试结果影响不大或无影响。