Effect of Apple Vinegar as a Final Irrigating Solution on Fracture Resistance and Microhardness of Radicular Dentin

W. Mahmoud, Wael H. Kamel, Heba A. Sharaf El Din
{"title":"Effect of Apple Vinegar as a Final Irrigating Solution on Fracture Resistance and Microhardness of Radicular Dentin","authors":"W. Mahmoud, Wael H. Kamel, Heba A. Sharaf El Din","doi":"10.21608/adjg.2021.76140.1377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: assessment of the fracture resistance and microhardness of radicular dentine following irrigation with apple vinegar as a final rinse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: fifty extracted human lower premolars, in accordance to the inclusion criteria were chosen. All lower premolars were decoronated then prepared using M3 ProGold rotary files and irrigated with 2.6% NaOCl 2 ml/1 min. Then all samples were distributed randomly into 2 main experimental groups (20 samples each) depending on the final rinse. Group I: irrigated with Apple vinegar (AV), Group II: irrigated with 17% Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and a Control group (10 samples): irrigated with sterile saline. All samples were prepared to be subjected to either fracture resistance or microhardness tests. The universal testing machine was used to assess fracture resistance. While the Vickers microhardness test was used to determine microhardness. RESULTS: In terms of fracture resistance, the results revealed that group II (EDTA) had a statistically significant reduction in fracture resistance, compared to group I (Apple vinegar), as well as the control group (saline). However, there was no statistically significant difference between group I (Apple vinegar) and control group (saline). While there was no statistically significant difference in total microhardness between the two main experimental groups, there was a statistically significant reduction in microhardness in the experimental groups as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding fracture resistance, apple vinegar shows better results than 17% EDTA. While, it is comparable to 17%EDTA in microhardness of radicular dentine. Codex : 09/21.10 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2021.76140.1377 Restorative Dentistry (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)","PeriodicalId":7493,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2021.76140.1377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

PURPOSE: assessment of the fracture resistance and microhardness of radicular dentine following irrigation with apple vinegar as a final rinse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: fifty extracted human lower premolars, in accordance to the inclusion criteria were chosen. All lower premolars were decoronated then prepared using M3 ProGold rotary files and irrigated with 2.6% NaOCl 2 ml/1 min. Then all samples were distributed randomly into 2 main experimental groups (20 samples each) depending on the final rinse. Group I: irrigated with Apple vinegar (AV), Group II: irrigated with 17% Ethylenediamine tetra acetic acid (EDTA) and a Control group (10 samples): irrigated with sterile saline. All samples were prepared to be subjected to either fracture resistance or microhardness tests. The universal testing machine was used to assess fracture resistance. While the Vickers microhardness test was used to determine microhardness. RESULTS: In terms of fracture resistance, the results revealed that group II (EDTA) had a statistically significant reduction in fracture resistance, compared to group I (Apple vinegar), as well as the control group (saline). However, there was no statistically significant difference between group I (Apple vinegar) and control group (saline). While there was no statistically significant difference in total microhardness between the two main experimental groups, there was a statistically significant reduction in microhardness in the experimental groups as compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Regarding fracture resistance, apple vinegar shows better results than 17% EDTA. While, it is comparable to 17%EDTA in microhardness of radicular dentine. Codex : 09/21.10 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2021.76140.1377 Restorative Dentistry (Removable Prosthodontics, Fixed Prosthodontics, Endodontics, Dental Biomaterials, Operative Dentistry)
苹果醋最终冲洗液对根状牙本质抗折性和显微硬度的影响
目的:评估根状牙本质在苹果醋冲洗后的抗骨折性和显微硬度。材料与方法:选择符合纳入标准的人下前磨牙50颗。所有下前磨牙均采用M3 ProGold旋转锉进行修整,并用2.6% NaOCl 2 ml/1 min冲洗。根据冲洗结果,将所有样品随机分为2个主要实验组(每组20个)。第一组:苹果醋(AV)冲洗,第二组:17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗,对照组(10例):无菌生理盐水冲洗。所有样品都准备好进行抗断裂或显微硬度测试。采用万能试验机进行抗断裂性能评估。采用维氏显微硬度试验测定显微硬度。结果:在抗骨折性方面,结果显示,与I组(苹果醋)和对照组(生理盐水)相比,II组(EDTA)的抗骨折性有统计学意义的降低。而I组(苹果醋)与对照组(生理盐水)的差异无统计学意义。两主实验组的总显微硬度差异无统计学意义,但实验组的显微硬度较对照组有统计学意义的降低。结论:在抗断裂方面,苹果醋的效果优于17% EDTA。而在根状牙本质的显微硬度方面,它与17%EDTA相当。法典:09/21.10 azhardentj@azhar.edu.eg http://adjg.journals.ekb.eg DOI: 10.21608/adjg.2021.76140.1377修复牙科(可移动修复,固定修复,牙髓学,牙科生物材料,牙科手术)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信