Defining Food Literacy and Its Application to Nutrition Interventions: A scoping Review

Hye-lim Yoo, Eunkyung Jo, Kirang Kim, Sohyun Park
{"title":"Defining Food Literacy and Its Application to Nutrition Interventions: A scoping Review","authors":"Hye-lim Yoo, Eunkyung Jo, Kirang Kim, Sohyun Park","doi":"10.5720/KJCN.2021.26.2.77","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"29, 2021 ABSTRACT Objectives: Food literacy (FL) can be an important concept that embodies the nutritional capabilities of individuals. The purpose of this study was to introduce the definition and core elements of FL from previous literature, to summarize measurement tools and intervention programs with FL, and to suggest the direction of future research and programs to integrate the concept of FL. Methods: The literature review was conducted through PubMed and Google Scholar databases by combining the search term ‘food literacy’ with ‘definition’, ‘measurement’, ‘questionnaire’, ‘intervention’, and ‘program’. Among the 94 papers primarily reviewed 31 manuscripts that suited the purpose of the study were used for analyses. Results: There is no consensus on the definition of FL that encompasses the multidimensional aspects of the concept. The definitions of FL were slightly different depending on the authors, and the interpretation of the core elements also varied. Based on the review, we propose a framework of FL that is in line with the current discussion among international researchers. This focuses on the core elements adapted from health literacy, namely functional, interactive, and critical FL. Specifically, we suggest some detailed elements for interactive and critical FL, which were often the subject of divergent views among researchers in previous literature. We found that most of the tools in the reviewed literature provided information on validity and reliability and were developed for a specific target population. Also, most of the tools were focused on functional FL. Similarly, most of the interventions targeted functional FL. Conclusions: This study reviewed the definition and core elements of FL, available measurement tools, and intervention programs using validated tools. We propose the development of tools with sound reliability and validity that encompass the three core elements of FL for different age groups. This will help to understand whether improving food literacy can translate into better nutritional intake and health status among individuals","PeriodicalId":74046,"journal":{"name":"Korean journal of community nutrition","volume":"34 1","pages":"77-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean journal of community nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5720/KJCN.2021.26.2.77","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

29, 2021 ABSTRACT Objectives: Food literacy (FL) can be an important concept that embodies the nutritional capabilities of individuals. The purpose of this study was to introduce the definition and core elements of FL from previous literature, to summarize measurement tools and intervention programs with FL, and to suggest the direction of future research and programs to integrate the concept of FL. Methods: The literature review was conducted through PubMed and Google Scholar databases by combining the search term ‘food literacy’ with ‘definition’, ‘measurement’, ‘questionnaire’, ‘intervention’, and ‘program’. Among the 94 papers primarily reviewed 31 manuscripts that suited the purpose of the study were used for analyses. Results: There is no consensus on the definition of FL that encompasses the multidimensional aspects of the concept. The definitions of FL were slightly different depending on the authors, and the interpretation of the core elements also varied. Based on the review, we propose a framework of FL that is in line with the current discussion among international researchers. This focuses on the core elements adapted from health literacy, namely functional, interactive, and critical FL. Specifically, we suggest some detailed elements for interactive and critical FL, which were often the subject of divergent views among researchers in previous literature. We found that most of the tools in the reviewed literature provided information on validity and reliability and were developed for a specific target population. Also, most of the tools were focused on functional FL. Similarly, most of the interventions targeted functional FL. Conclusions: This study reviewed the definition and core elements of FL, available measurement tools, and intervention programs using validated tools. We propose the development of tools with sound reliability and validity that encompass the three core elements of FL for different age groups. This will help to understand whether improving food literacy can translate into better nutritional intake and health status among individuals
定义食物素养及其在营养干预中的应用:范围综述
摘要目的:食品素养(Food literacy, FL)是体现个人营养能力的一个重要概念。本研究的目的是从文献中介绍食物素养的定义和核心要素,总结食物素养的测量工具和干预方案,并提出未来的研究方向和方案,以整合食物素养的概念。方法:通过PubMed和谷歌Scholar数据库,将“食物素养”搜索词与“定义”、“测量”、“问卷”、“干预”和“程序”相结合,进行文献综述。在主要审查的94篇论文中,31篇符合研究目的的手稿被用于分析。结果:对FL的定义,包括概念的多维方面没有共识。不同作者对FL的定义略有不同,对核心要素的解释也各不相同。在此基础上,我们提出了一个与当前国际学者讨论一致的FL框架。本文重点讨论了健康素养的核心要素,即功能性、互动性和批判性FL。具体而言,我们提出了一些交互式和批判性FL的详细要素,这些要素在以前的文献中往往是研究人员意见分歧的主题。我们发现,在回顾的文献中,大多数工具提供了效度和信度的信息,并且是为特定的目标人群开发的。同样,大多数干预措施针对功能性FL。结论:本研究回顾了FL的定义和核心要素、可用的测量工具以及使用经过验证的工具的干预方案。我们建议开发具有良好的可靠性和有效性的工具,涵盖了不同年龄组的FL的三个核心要素。这将有助于了解提高食品素养是否可以转化为个人更好的营养摄入和健康状况
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信