Alternative Project Delivery Method Adoption in the AEC Industry: An Organizational Change Perspective

Q1 Social Sciences
K. Aldossari, Brian C. Lines, Jake B. Smithwick, Kristen Hurtado, K. Sullivan
{"title":"Alternative Project Delivery Method Adoption in the AEC Industry: An Organizational Change Perspective","authors":"K. Aldossari, Brian C. Lines, Jake B. Smithwick, Kristen Hurtado, K. Sullivan","doi":"10.1080/15578771.2021.2013997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In the last two decades, an increasing number of organizations have shifted from using the design-bid-build delivery method (DBB) to alternative project delivery methods (APDMs). This shift requires changes for both the organizations and the individuals involved. This study provides guidelines detailing how to lead APDM adoption at the organizational level through using a change management perspective. The guidelines were developed based on analyzing the results of semi-structured interviews with nine individuals. The participants were industry professionals who were selected because their organizations had successfully adopted APDMs. The findings from the interviews indicate that the best opportunity to implement APDMs successfully is available through using four phases. The phases are preparing and planning, pilot project testing the project, expanding to the intended scale and sustaining and evaluating. The phases include specific organizational change management (OCM) practices that increase the probability of successful APDM adoption. This study contributes to organizational change in the AEC industry by explaining how OCM practices are used to implement APDMs successfully. This study also contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing guidelines that can help public owner organizations as they consider adopting APDMs for the first time.","PeriodicalId":39782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Construction Education and Research","volume":"85 1","pages":"150 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Construction Education and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15578771.2021.2013997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT In the last two decades, an increasing number of organizations have shifted from using the design-bid-build delivery method (DBB) to alternative project delivery methods (APDMs). This shift requires changes for both the organizations and the individuals involved. This study provides guidelines detailing how to lead APDM adoption at the organizational level through using a change management perspective. The guidelines were developed based on analyzing the results of semi-structured interviews with nine individuals. The participants were industry professionals who were selected because their organizations had successfully adopted APDMs. The findings from the interviews indicate that the best opportunity to implement APDMs successfully is available through using four phases. The phases are preparing and planning, pilot project testing the project, expanding to the intended scale and sustaining and evaluating. The phases include specific organizational change management (OCM) practices that increase the probability of successful APDM adoption. This study contributes to organizational change in the AEC industry by explaining how OCM practices are used to implement APDMs successfully. This study also contributes to the existing body of knowledge by providing guidelines that can help public owner organizations as they consider adopting APDMs for the first time.
AEC行业采用替代项目交付方法:组织变革视角
在过去的二十年中,越来越多的组织已经从使用设计-投标-建造交付方法(DBB)转向使用替代项目交付方法(apdm)。这种转变需要组织和相关的个人做出改变。本研究提供了详细的指导方针,说明如何通过使用变更管理的视角在组织级别上引导APDM的采用。该指南是基于对九个人的半结构化访谈结果的分析而制定的。参与者是业界的专业人士,他们被选中是因为他们的组织已经成功地采用了apdm。访谈的结果表明,通过使用四个阶段,可以获得成功实现apdm的最佳机会。这些阶段是准备和规划,试点项目测试项目,扩展到预期规模以及维持和评估。这些阶段包括特定的组织变更管理(OCM)实践,这些实践增加了成功采用APDM的可能性。本研究通过解释OCM实践如何成功地实现apdm,对AEC行业的组织变革做出了贡献。本研究还通过提供指导方针为现有的知识体系做出贡献,这些指导方针可以帮助公共所有者组织在考虑首次采用apdm时提供帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Construction Education and Research is a respected international refereed journal that publishes original works that address cutting edge issues related to construction around the globe. The Journal supports the mission of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC), a professional association comprised of about 100 universities and colleges. The ASC encourages the sharing of ideas and knowledge and promotes excellence in curricula, teaching, research and service relating to the construction industry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信