DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT FOR DEFORMATION ANALYSIS PURPOSES USING GNSS AND INSAR

D. Sarsito, B. Bramanto
{"title":"DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL ALTERNATIVES ASSESSMENT FOR DEFORMATION ANALYSIS PURPOSES USING GNSS AND INSAR","authors":"D. Sarsito, B. Bramanto","doi":"10.31172/jmg.v23i1.845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is the starting point in the analysis performed to explain the deformation pattern changes from the Earth's surface. The estimated value of deformation based on point-wise GPS and InSAR data with a better spatial resolution must be defined in a reference frame system that reflects the phenomenon of deformation of the real physical world, e.g., orthometric height for the vertical component. Therefore, this study aims to provide alternative DEM models based on a suitable combination between the Global Geopotential Model of Earth Geopotential Model 2008 (EGM2008) and global terrain models, providing position changes with respect to the orthometric height. The alternative DEM models are (i) the global elevation model of ETOPO1 (DEM1), (ii) the modified global elevation model of SRTM30_PLUS (DEM2), and (iii) the regional elevation model of DEMNAS (DEM3). These alternative models comply with each other for the land areas with mean difference values lower than 1 meter. While for the ocean areas, we found that DEM1 and DEM2 have apparent differences due to the different types of data used. However, a similar assessment could not be performed for DEM3 as it only covers the land areas. Additionally, we compared the orthometric height from these terrain models with leveling observations for the coinciding locations. DEM3 achieves the highest accuracy with the estimated standard deviation of 11.2745 meters and is followed by DEM2 and DEM1 with the respective standard deviation of 29.4498 and 37.6872 meters. We found that these models can be used as a starting position determination for horizontal and vertical deformation analysis.","PeriodicalId":32347,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Meteorologi dan Geofisika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31172/jmg.v23i1.845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is the starting point in the analysis performed to explain the deformation pattern changes from the Earth's surface. The estimated value of deformation based on point-wise GPS and InSAR data with a better spatial resolution must be defined in a reference frame system that reflects the phenomenon of deformation of the real physical world, e.g., orthometric height for the vertical component. Therefore, this study aims to provide alternative DEM models based on a suitable combination between the Global Geopotential Model of Earth Geopotential Model 2008 (EGM2008) and global terrain models, providing position changes with respect to the orthometric height. The alternative DEM models are (i) the global elevation model of ETOPO1 (DEM1), (ii) the modified global elevation model of SRTM30_PLUS (DEM2), and (iii) the regional elevation model of DEMNAS (DEM3). These alternative models comply with each other for the land areas with mean difference values lower than 1 meter. While for the ocean areas, we found that DEM1 and DEM2 have apparent differences due to the different types of data used. However, a similar assessment could not be performed for DEM3 as it only covers the land areas. Additionally, we compared the orthometric height from these terrain models with leveling observations for the coinciding locations. DEM3 achieves the highest accuracy with the estimated standard deviation of 11.2745 meters and is followed by DEM2 and DEM1 with the respective standard deviation of 29.4498 and 37.6872 meters. We found that these models can be used as a starting position determination for horizontal and vertical deformation analysis.
使用GNSS和insar进行变形分析的数字高程模型替代评估
数字高程模型(DEM)是解释地球表面变形模式变化分析的起点。基于点向GPS和InSAR数据的更好空间分辨率的变形估计值必须在反映真实物理世界的变形现象的参考系系统中定义,例如垂直分量的正交高度。因此,本研究旨在提供基于Global gepotential Model of Earth gepotential Model 2008 (EGM2008)和全球地形模型之间的合适组合的替代DEM模型,提供相对于正测高度的位置变化。可供选择的DEM模型有:(i) ETOPO1的全球高程模型(DEM1), (ii) SRTM30_PLUS的修正全球高程模型(DEM2), (iii) DEMNAS的区域高程模型(DEM3)。对于平均差值小于1 m的陆地区域,这些备选模型相互符合。而对于海洋区域,由于使用的数据类型不同,我们发现DEM1和DEM2有明显的差异。但是,DEM3无法进行类似的评估,因为它只涵盖陆地区域。此外,我们将这些地形模型的正交高度与重合地点的水准观测结果进行了比较。DEM3精度最高,估计标准差为11.2745 m,其次是DEM2和DEM1,标准差分别为29.4498和37.6872 m。我们发现这些模型可以作为水平和垂直变形分析的起始位置确定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信