Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from a Resource Limited Setting of Nigeria

R. Ogu, C. John, O. Maduka, S. Chinenye
{"title":"Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Findings from a Resource Limited Setting of Nigeria","authors":"R. Ogu, C. John, O. Maduka, S. Chinenye","doi":"10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Diabetes is a growing non communicable disease (NCD) epidemic. Current international guidelines dictate that in pregnancy, universal screening for GDM for early detection is essential to improve feto-maternal outcomes. However in resource limited settings, risk based screening is still in practice. We undertook records-based review of 837 women who accessed antenatal care between November 2014 and October 2015. The aim was to evaluate the pattern of screening and clinical outcomes of GDM in a resource limited setting of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Only 3.7% of the study population representing 31 women was screened for GDM, giving the Original Research Article Ogu et al.; BJMMR, 20(11): 1-8, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.31966 2 overall prevalence of GDM among study participants as 3.3% (28 women). A comparison of fetomaternal outcomes between women screened for GDM and those not screened for GDM showed comparable proportions for gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery and fetal outcome relating to hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress and neonatal jaundice. Also, a significantly higher proportion of babies born to mothers who were screened for GDM were admitted into the Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU). There was no significant difference between the prevalence of stillbirths, neonatal jaundice, hypoglycaemia and respiratory distress in babies born to women diagnosed with GDM compared with babies born to women not screened for GDM. Selective risk based screening for GDM may be leading to missed cases of GDM. The need for universal screening is hereby reiterated.","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"84 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Diabetes is a growing non communicable disease (NCD) epidemic. Current international guidelines dictate that in pregnancy, universal screening for GDM for early detection is essential to improve feto-maternal outcomes. However in resource limited settings, risk based screening is still in practice. We undertook records-based review of 837 women who accessed antenatal care between November 2014 and October 2015. The aim was to evaluate the pattern of screening and clinical outcomes of GDM in a resource limited setting of the Niger Delta region of Nigeria. Only 3.7% of the study population representing 31 women was screened for GDM, giving the Original Research Article Ogu et al.; BJMMR, 20(11): 1-8, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.31966 2 overall prevalence of GDM among study participants as 3.3% (28 women). A comparison of fetomaternal outcomes between women screened for GDM and those not screened for GDM showed comparable proportions for gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery and fetal outcome relating to hypoglycaemia, respiratory distress and neonatal jaundice. Also, a significantly higher proportion of babies born to mothers who were screened for GDM were admitted into the Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU). There was no significant difference between the prevalence of stillbirths, neonatal jaundice, hypoglycaemia and respiratory distress in babies born to women diagnosed with GDM compared with babies born to women not screened for GDM. Selective risk based screening for GDM may be leading to missed cases of GDM. The need for universal screening is hereby reiterated.
筛查妊娠期糖尿病:从尼日利亚资源有限的设置结果
糖尿病是一种日益严重的非传染性疾病。目前的国际指南规定,在妊娠期间,普遍筛查GDM以早期发现是改善胎母结局的必要条件。然而,在资源有限的情况下,基于风险的筛查仍在实践中。我们对2014年11月至2015年10月期间接受产前护理的837名妇女进行了基于记录的回顾。目的是评估尼日利亚尼日尔三角洲地区资源有限的GDM筛查模式和临床结果。只有3.7%的研究人群(31名女性)接受了GDM筛查,原始研究文章Ogu等人;生物医学工程学报,20(11):1-8,2017;文章no.BJMMR。31966 2研究参与者中GDM的总体患病率为3.3%(28名女性)。一项对接受GDM筛查的妇女和未接受GDM筛查的妇女的胎母结局的比较显示,分娩时的胎龄、分娩方式和与低血糖、呼吸窘迫和新生儿黄疸有关的胎儿结局的比例相当。此外,接受GDM筛查的母亲所生的婴儿被送入特殊护理婴儿病房(SCBU)的比例明显更高。诊断为GDM的妇女所生婴儿的死产、新生儿黄疸、低血糖和呼吸窘迫的患病率与未进行GDM筛查的妇女所生婴儿的患病率没有显著差异。选择性的基于风险的GDM筛查可能导致遗漏GDM病例。特此重申普遍筛查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信