Ecosystem services valuation in developing countries: a review of methods and applicability approach

IF 1.5 Q3 URBAN STUDIES
Coral Zayreth Morando-Figueroa, Carlos Salazar-Briones, José Mizael Ruiz-Gibert, Marcelo A. Lomeli-Banda
{"title":"Ecosystem services valuation in developing countries: a review of methods and applicability approach","authors":"Coral Zayreth Morando-Figueroa, Carlos Salazar-Briones, José Mizael Ruiz-Gibert, Marcelo A. Lomeli-Banda","doi":"10.1680/jurdp.21.00045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urban growth has compromised the capacity of Ecosystem Services (ES), causing impacts such as degradation, urban heat islands, climate change, and floods. Valuing ES can help improve their condition and management through political and urban planning instruments. The present study was developed by reviewing the literature using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) disclosure guidelines to identify ES valuation methods based on the Total Economic Value (TEV) framework. The literature review included 117 articles that a) were based on the TEV framework and b) offered a quantitative result. The results show that: a) 52 studies evaluated more than one ES and that the regulation service is the most investigated, b) the contingent valuation method is the most used and the least used was the production function, and c) that 78 of the 117 studies conclude with proposals for the implementation of public policies, of which conservation, protection, and restoration policies are the most important and the method most used for public proposals was the contingent valuation method. It is essential to mention that implementing ES valuation in urban planning benefits users and ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":44716,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Urban Design and Planning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jurdp.21.00045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Urban growth has compromised the capacity of Ecosystem Services (ES), causing impacts such as degradation, urban heat islands, climate change, and floods. Valuing ES can help improve their condition and management through political and urban planning instruments. The present study was developed by reviewing the literature using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) disclosure guidelines to identify ES valuation methods based on the Total Economic Value (TEV) framework. The literature review included 117 articles that a) were based on the TEV framework and b) offered a quantitative result. The results show that: a) 52 studies evaluated more than one ES and that the regulation service is the most investigated, b) the contingent valuation method is the most used and the least used was the production function, and c) that 78 of the 117 studies conclude with proposals for the implementation of public policies, of which conservation, protection, and restoration policies are the most important and the method most used for public proposals was the contingent valuation method. It is essential to mention that implementing ES valuation in urban planning benefits users and ecosystems.
发展中国家生态系统服务价值评估:方法和适用性方法综述
城市增长削弱了生态系统服务(ES)的能力,造成了退化、城市热岛、气候变化和洪水等影响。重视生态环境可以通过政治和城市规划手段帮助改善其状况和管理。本研究是通过使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)披露指南来回顾文献,以确定基于总经济价值(TEV)框架的ES评估方法。文献综述包括117篇文章,a)基于TEV框架,b)提供定量结果。结果表明:52项研究评价了多个ES,其中监管服务被调查最多;b)条件价值法使用最多,生产函数使用最少;c) 117项研究中有78项研究总结了公共政策的实施建议,其中保护、保护和恢复政策最重要,公共建议使用最多的方法是条件价值法。必须提到的是,在城市规划中实施环境评价有利于用户和生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
30.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信