COVID-19 in a Patient with Autoimmune Scleritis on Triple Immunosuppression – An Immunological Perspective

M. Moreker, A. Bansal
{"title":"COVID-19 in a Patient with Autoimmune Scleritis on Triple Immunosuppression – An Immunological Perspective","authors":"M. Moreker, A. Bansal","doi":"10.15713/ins.bhj.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic can be vexing for uveitis specialists; especially when faced with a situation; wherein a follow-up patient on immunosuppressants; tests positive for SARS-CoV-2. It was indeed extremely worrisome for us; when our patient; a 41-year-old diabetic lady with autoimmune posterior scleritis with a follow-up of about 8 months; on 12.5 mg/day of oral prednisolone, weekly subcutaneous 25 mg methotrexate and 3 monthly 750 mg pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after having an episode of fever and body ache for 5 days; in June 2020. Increased predisposition to infection because of our immunosuppressive treatment and possible worse outcome was our logical concerns. This led us to study the interaction of the human immune system with SARS-CoV-2 and the implications that such an interaction would have; in a patient on immunomodulatory treatment. Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 include all arms of the immune system; tissue barriers, innate and adaptive cells, and mediators. The innate immune response is first activated mainly through pattern recognition receptors; resulting in release of Type 1 interferons and other inflammatory cytokines. In more severe infections, there is lymphopenia with reduced CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells and reduced monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The dreaded “cytokine storm” with excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-17, granulocyte colonystimulating factor, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein1α, and tumor necrosis factor occurs in severe cases with resultant extensive tissue damage in lungs and other organs. Thus, an impaired initial adaptive immune response, followed by an uncontrolled activation of the innate immune response, causes severe disease.[1] An experimental coronavirus retinopathy model explains this biphasic nature of severe disease; a direct viral insult is at the basis of the initial infection which later on turns into a severe immune reaction, leading to potentially massive tissue damage.[2] Current best practice guidelines worldwide in relation to COVID-19 and immunosuppression in ophthalmology recommend the continuation of immunosuppressive treatment in patients who require them; with few exceptions.[3] The objective of continuation of immunosuppression is maintenance of remission on treatment, thus avoiding the need for possible high dose corticosteroid therapy in case of a relapse on an attempt to stop or taper these agents; which can be counterproductive.[3] In case of COVID-19 in a patient on these agents; data extrapolated from other specialties suggests reduction of oral prednisolone to <40 mg/day, temporarily withholding immunomodulatory treatments; while carefully monitoring COVID-19 disease and resumption of treatment once patient is asymptomatic.[4,5] This strategy was employed in the management of our patient; once she tested positive for COVID-19 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Her chest CT scan showed several randomly distributed patchy areas of ground-glass opacification in bilateral lung parenchyma with predominant involvement of the right upper and lower lobes. Parenchymal involvement was between 5% and 25% in the right upper and both lower lobes and approximately 5% in the left upper and right middle lobe with a CT COVID score of 8. Her blood investigations showed a total leukocyte count of 5160/cmm; IL-6 level 26.9 pg/ml; serum lactate dehydrogenase level 269.2 U/L; C-reactive protein level 38.9 mg/l; D-dimer level 478.2 ng/ml; serum procalcitonin <0.05 ng/ml; and plasma fibrinogen-C level 358 mg/dl. In COVID ward; oral prednisolone at 12.5 mg/day was continued; but weekly subcutaneous methotrexate was withheld for 3 weeks till she became asymptomatic with no complications. At discharge, she had no breathlessness and maintained a SpO2 of 99% both pre and post a 3 min walk test. Now at 16 weeks post-testing positive for COVID-19; and a total follow-up of 1 year with us; she remains asymptomatic from both respiratory and ophthalmic point of view and is on a tapered dose of 7.5 mg of oral prednisolone/day. She Mayur R. Moreker1, Avya Bansal2","PeriodicalId":85654,"journal":{"name":"The Bombay Hospital journal","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Bombay Hospital journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.bhj.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic can be vexing for uveitis specialists; especially when faced with a situation; wherein a follow-up patient on immunosuppressants; tests positive for SARS-CoV-2. It was indeed extremely worrisome for us; when our patient; a 41-year-old diabetic lady with autoimmune posterior scleritis with a follow-up of about 8 months; on 12.5 mg/day of oral prednisolone, weekly subcutaneous 25 mg methotrexate and 3 monthly 750 mg pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 after having an episode of fever and body ache for 5 days; in June 2020. Increased predisposition to infection because of our immunosuppressive treatment and possible worse outcome was our logical concerns. This led us to study the interaction of the human immune system with SARS-CoV-2 and the implications that such an interaction would have; in a patient on immunomodulatory treatment. Immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 include all arms of the immune system; tissue barriers, innate and adaptive cells, and mediators. The innate immune response is first activated mainly through pattern recognition receptors; resulting in release of Type 1 interferons and other inflammatory cytokines. In more severe infections, there is lymphopenia with reduced CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, B cells, and natural killer cells and reduced monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils. The dreaded “cytokine storm” with excessive release of pro-inflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-8, IL-17, granulocyte colonystimulating factor, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, interferon gamma-induced protein-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, macrophage inflammatory protein1α, and tumor necrosis factor occurs in severe cases with resultant extensive tissue damage in lungs and other organs. Thus, an impaired initial adaptive immune response, followed by an uncontrolled activation of the innate immune response, causes severe disease.[1] An experimental coronavirus retinopathy model explains this biphasic nature of severe disease; a direct viral insult is at the basis of the initial infection which later on turns into a severe immune reaction, leading to potentially massive tissue damage.[2] Current best practice guidelines worldwide in relation to COVID-19 and immunosuppression in ophthalmology recommend the continuation of immunosuppressive treatment in patients who require them; with few exceptions.[3] The objective of continuation of immunosuppression is maintenance of remission on treatment, thus avoiding the need for possible high dose corticosteroid therapy in case of a relapse on an attempt to stop or taper these agents; which can be counterproductive.[3] In case of COVID-19 in a patient on these agents; data extrapolated from other specialties suggests reduction of oral prednisolone to <40 mg/day, temporarily withholding immunomodulatory treatments; while carefully monitoring COVID-19 disease and resumption of treatment once patient is asymptomatic.[4,5] This strategy was employed in the management of our patient; once she tested positive for COVID-19 with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Her chest CT scan showed several randomly distributed patchy areas of ground-glass opacification in bilateral lung parenchyma with predominant involvement of the right upper and lower lobes. Parenchymal involvement was between 5% and 25% in the right upper and both lower lobes and approximately 5% in the left upper and right middle lobe with a CT COVID score of 8. Her blood investigations showed a total leukocyte count of 5160/cmm; IL-6 level 26.9 pg/ml; serum lactate dehydrogenase level 269.2 U/L; C-reactive protein level 38.9 mg/l; D-dimer level 478.2 ng/ml; serum procalcitonin <0.05 ng/ml; and plasma fibrinogen-C level 358 mg/dl. In COVID ward; oral prednisolone at 12.5 mg/day was continued; but weekly subcutaneous methotrexate was withheld for 3 weeks till she became asymptomatic with no complications. At discharge, she had no breathlessness and maintained a SpO2 of 99% both pre and post a 3 min walk test. Now at 16 weeks post-testing positive for COVID-19; and a total follow-up of 1 year with us; she remains asymptomatic from both respiratory and ophthalmic point of view and is on a tapered dose of 7.5 mg of oral prednisolone/day. She Mayur R. Moreker1, Avya Bansal2
COVID-19在自身免疫性硬化炎患者三重免疫抑制-免疫学观点
正在进行的COVID-19大流行可能让葡萄膜炎专家烦恼;尤指面对某种情况时;其中一名接受免疫抑制剂随访的患者;SARS-CoV-2检测呈阳性这确实让我们非常担心;当我们的病人;41岁糖尿病女性伴自身免疫性后巩膜炎,随访约8个月;12.5 mg/天口服强的松龙,每周皮下注射25 mg甲氨蝶呤和3个月750 mg脉冲静脉注射环磷酰胺,在出现发烧和身体疼痛5天后检测出SARS-CoV-2阳性;2020年6月。由于我们的免疫抑制治疗和可能的更糟糕的结果,增加了感染的易感性是我们的逻辑担忧。这促使我们研究人类免疫系统与SARS-CoV-2的相互作用以及这种相互作用可能产生的影响;一个接受免疫调节治疗的病人。对SARS-CoV-2的免疫反应包括免疫系统的所有分支;组织屏障,先天和适应性细胞,和介质。先天免疫反应首先主要通过模式识别受体激活;导致1型干扰素和其他炎性细胞因子的释放。在更严重的感染中,淋巴细胞减少,CD4+ T细胞、CD8+ T细胞、B细胞和自然杀伤细胞减少,单核细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞和嗜碱性粒细胞减少。可怕的“细胞因子风暴”,促炎细胞因子白介素(IL)-6、IL-1β、IL-2、IL-8、IL-17、粒细胞集落刺激因子、粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子、干扰素γ诱导蛋白-10、单核细胞趋化蛋白-1、巨噬细胞炎症蛋白1α和肿瘤坏死因子的过度释放,在严重的情况下会导致肺部和其他器官的广泛组织损伤。因此,最初的适应性免疫反应受损,随后是先天免疫反应的不受控制的激活,导致严重的疾病。[1]一种实验性冠状病毒视网膜病变模型解释了这种严重疾病的双期性;直接的病毒感染是最初感染的基础,后来会转变为严重的免疫反应,导致潜在的大规模组织损伤。[2]目前全球关于COVID-19和眼科免疫抑制的最佳实践指南建议对有需要的患者继续进行免疫抑制治疗;除了少数例外。[3]继续免疫抑制的目的是维持治疗后的缓解,从而避免在试图停止或逐渐减少这些药物的情况下复发时可能需要高剂量的皮质类固醇治疗;这可能会适得其反。[3]如果患者感染COVID-19,使用这些药物;从其他专业推断的数据表明口服强的松龙减少到< 40mg /天,暂时停止免疫调节治疗;同时密切监测COVID-19病情,一旦患者无症状,立即恢复治疗。[4,5]这一策略被用于我们的病人的管理;因为她的COVID-19逆转录聚合酶链反应呈阳性。胸部CT扫描显示双侧肺实质随机分布的片状磨玻璃混浊区,主要累及右上肺叶和下肺叶。右侧上叶和两侧下叶实质受累在5% ~ 25%之间,左侧上叶和右侧中叶约5%,CT COVID评分为8。她的血液检查显示白细胞总数5160/cmm;IL-6水平26.9 pg/ml;血清乳酸脱氢酶269.2 U/L;c反应蛋白38.9 mg/l;d -二聚体水平478.2 ng/ml;血清降钙素原<0.05 ng/ml;血浆纤维蛋白原c水平为358mg /dl。COVID病区;继续口服强的松龙12.5 mg/天;每周甲氨蝶呤皮下注射3周,直至无症状,无并发症。出院时,患者无呼吸困难,3分钟步行测试前后SpO2均维持在99%。现在,在COVID-19检测呈阳性后16周;总共随访了1年;从呼吸和眼科的角度来看,她仍然无症状,口服强的松龙的剂量逐渐减少,为每天7.5 mg。她·r·莫尔克,阿维娅·班萨尔
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信