Comparing Focus on Form and Focus on Forms in Second-Language Vocabulary Learning.

IF 0.5 3区 文学 Q3 LINGUISTICS
B. Laufer
{"title":"Comparing Focus on Form and Focus on Forms in Second-Language Vocabulary Learning.","authors":"B. Laufer","doi":"10.3138/CMLR.63.1.149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The study compares the effectiveness of Focus on Form (FonF) and Focus on FormS (FonFs) approaches in learning new L2 words by 158 high-school learners of English as L2. In phase 1 of the study, the FonF group read a text containing the target words, discussed it in small groups, and answered comprehension questions. The FonFs group studied the target words as discrete items with their meanings and examples of usage. In phase 2 of the study, all learners received the target words with their meanings and studied them for 15 minutes for a quiz. They were tested immediately after each phase, and two weeks later. Results revealed significantly higher scores for FonFs group after phase 1, but the difference disappeared after phase 2. As learners cannot be expected to study all vocabulary for tests, form-focused instruction - and particularly FonFs - is claimed to be indispensable for L2 vocabulary learning.","PeriodicalId":47109,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"177","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Modern Language Review-Revue Canadienne Des Langues Vivantes","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CMLR.63.1.149","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 177

Abstract

Abstract: The study compares the effectiveness of Focus on Form (FonF) and Focus on FormS (FonFs) approaches in learning new L2 words by 158 high-school learners of English as L2. In phase 1 of the study, the FonF group read a text containing the target words, discussed it in small groups, and answered comprehension questions. The FonFs group studied the target words as discrete items with their meanings and examples of usage. In phase 2 of the study, all learners received the target words with their meanings and studied them for 15 minutes for a quiz. They were tested immediately after each phase, and two weeks later. Results revealed significantly higher scores for FonFs group after phase 1, but the difference disappeared after phase 2. As learners cannot be expected to study all vocabulary for tests, form-focused instruction - and particularly FonFs - is claimed to be indispensable for L2 vocabulary learning.
第二语言词汇学习中注重形式与注重形式的比较
摘要:本研究以158名高中英语学习者为对象,比较了注重形式(Focus on Form, FonF)和注重形式(Focus on FormS, FonF)两种学习方法在二语新单词学习中的效果。在研究的第一阶段,FonF小组阅读一篇包含目标单词的文章,小组讨论,并回答理解问题。FonFs组将目标单词作为独立的条目来研究其含义和用法示例。在研究的第二阶段,所有的学习者都收到了目标单词及其含义,并在15分钟的测试中学习了这些单词。他们在每个阶段结束后立即接受测试,两周后接受测试。结果显示,第一阶段后,FonFs组得分明显提高,第二阶段后差异消失。由于学习者不可能为了考试而学习所有的词汇,所以以形式为中心的教学——尤其是以形式为中心的教学——被认为是二语词汇学习不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: During the more than 60 years of its existence, The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes has evolved from an Ontario-centered journal containing mainly classroom-based teaching strategies and resources to a Canada-wide, bilingual, refereed scholarly publication of national scope and international repute. The CMLR/RCLV serves members of the teaching profession, administrators and researchers interested in all levels of English and French as second languages and, in addition, those interested in native and other modern, international, or heritage language programs and issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信