Factors predicting pain and effect of oral analgesia in topical photodynamic therapy

R. Hambly, N. Mansoor, C. Quinlan, Z. Shah, P. Lenane, N. Ralph, F. Moloney
{"title":"Factors predicting pain and effect of oral analgesia in topical photodynamic therapy","authors":"R. Hambly, N. Mansoor, C. Quinlan, Z. Shah, P. Lenane, N. Ralph, F. Moloney","doi":"10.1111/phpp.12301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To The Editor, Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is highly efficacious for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK), Bowen’s disease (BD) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), and efficacious in thin nodular BCCs (nBCC) (1). It is generally well tolerated, with pain or discomfort being a known side effect (1). Pain is typically described as a burning or stinging sensation of varying intensity. Prior studies looking at factors which influence pain during PDT have shown conflicting results (2–5). The aim of our study was to identify any patient or treatment factors associated with higher levels of pain during PDT and to assess the effect of pretreatment analgesia. Treatment is standardised in our centre and documented in a standard treatment proforma. Patients receive one treatment per course for AK and two treatments per course, one week apart, for BD and BCC. Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL–Metvix Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway) is used as a photosensitising agent. Wood’s lamp fluorescence (WLF) is used to assess absorption of the photosensitiser (excellent/good/poor). The Aktilite (Photocure ASA) (LED red light, 630 nm, 37J/cm) or Waldmann 1200L (Waldmann Medizintechnik, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) (filtered halogen lamp, non-coherent red light, 570–730 nm, 50J/cm) light-source is used. Patients complete a visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) to grade their pain during and after treatment. The highest pain score experienced during treatment is documented (range 0–100). Patients who are unable to complete a VAPS, for example, due to eyesight difficulty, are asked to grade their pain on a similar scale. Patients are offered oral analgesia 30 min pretreatment, and type of analgesia taken is documented. A fan and cooling water spray are provided during treatment. Following ethics approval, retrospective chart review was completed. Data were compiled in Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). All AK, BD and BCC treated between 2009 and mid-2015 were included in analysis. Complete data sets were available on all patients. Pearson’s chi-square, independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to obtain Pvalues, unless otherwise stated. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using binary logistic regression. For the purpose of binary logistic regression, a dichotomous pain response was defined by dividing the VAPS into two groups at the median 40 (1–40 and 41–100). In total, 200 cases of AK, BD and BCC, in 109 patients were analysed. The average age was 74.6 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 9.55 range 33–96). The femaleto male-percentage split was 61 : 39. Sixty nine per cent of lesions were located on the limbs, 17% on the trunk and 14% on the head/neck. Fifty four per cent of lesions were BD, 24% BCC and 22% AK.","PeriodicalId":20060,"journal":{"name":"Photodermatology","volume":"05 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photodermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

To The Editor, Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) is highly efficacious for the treatment of actinic keratosis (AK), Bowen’s disease (BD) and superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC), and efficacious in thin nodular BCCs (nBCC) (1). It is generally well tolerated, with pain or discomfort being a known side effect (1). Pain is typically described as a burning or stinging sensation of varying intensity. Prior studies looking at factors which influence pain during PDT have shown conflicting results (2–5). The aim of our study was to identify any patient or treatment factors associated with higher levels of pain during PDT and to assess the effect of pretreatment analgesia. Treatment is standardised in our centre and documented in a standard treatment proforma. Patients receive one treatment per course for AK and two treatments per course, one week apart, for BD and BCC. Methyl aminolevulinate (MAL–Metvix Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway) is used as a photosensitising agent. Wood’s lamp fluorescence (WLF) is used to assess absorption of the photosensitiser (excellent/good/poor). The Aktilite (Photocure ASA) (LED red light, 630 nm, 37J/cm) or Waldmann 1200L (Waldmann Medizintechnik, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany) (filtered halogen lamp, non-coherent red light, 570–730 nm, 50J/cm) light-source is used. Patients complete a visual analogue pain scale (VAPS) to grade their pain during and after treatment. The highest pain score experienced during treatment is documented (range 0–100). Patients who are unable to complete a VAPS, for example, due to eyesight difficulty, are asked to grade their pain on a similar scale. Patients are offered oral analgesia 30 min pretreatment, and type of analgesia taken is documented. A fan and cooling water spray are provided during treatment. Following ethics approval, retrospective chart review was completed. Data were compiled in Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). All AK, BD and BCC treated between 2009 and mid-2015 were included in analysis. Complete data sets were available on all patients. Pearson’s chi-square, independent samples t-test and one-way ANOVA were used to obtain Pvalues, unless otherwise stated. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using binary logistic regression. For the purpose of binary logistic regression, a dichotomous pain response was defined by dividing the VAPS into two groups at the median 40 (1–40 and 41–100). In total, 200 cases of AK, BD and BCC, in 109 patients were analysed. The average age was 74.6 years (Standard Deviation [SD] 9.55 range 33–96). The femaleto male-percentage split was 61 : 39. Sixty nine per cent of lesions were located on the limbs, 17% on the trunk and 14% on the head/neck. Fifty four per cent of lesions were BD, 24% BCC and 22% AK.
局部光动力治疗中疼痛预测因素及口服镇痛效果
局部光动力疗法(PDT)对光化性角化病(AK)、鲍恩氏病(BD)和浅表性基底细胞癌(sBCC)的治疗非常有效,对薄结节性基底细胞癌(nBCC)也有效(1)。它通常耐受性良好,已知的副作用是疼痛或不适(1)。疼痛通常被描述为不同强度的灼烧感或刺痛感。先前的研究着眼于PDT期间影响疼痛的因素,显示了相互矛盾的结果(2-5)。我们研究的目的是确定任何与PDT期间较高疼痛水平相关的患者或治疗因素,并评估预处理镇痛的效果。治疗在我们的中心是标准化的,并记录在标准的治疗形式。患者接受一个疗程的AK治疗和两个疗程的BD和BCC治疗,间隔一周。甲基氨基乙酰丙酸酯(MAL-Metvix Photocure ASA, Oslo, Norway)被用作光敏剂。伍德灯荧光(WLF)用于评估光敏剂的吸收(优/好/差)。采用Aktilite (Photocure ASA) (LED红光,630 nm, 37J/cm)或Waldmann 1200L (Waldmann Medizintechnik, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany)(滤光卤素灯,非相干红光,570-730 nm, 50J/cm)光源。患者在治疗期间和治疗后完成视觉模拟疼痛量表(VAPS)来评定疼痛程度。记录治疗期间经历的最高疼痛评分(范围0-100)。例如,由于视力困难而无法完成VAPS的患者被要求按类似的等级对疼痛进行分级。患者给予口服镇痛预处理30分钟,并记录所采取的镇痛类型。在处理过程中提供风扇和冷却水喷雾。伦理批准后,完成回顾性图表审查。数据在Microsoft Excel中编制,并使用SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics for Macintosh, Version 22.0)进行分析。纽约州阿蒙克市:IBM Corp.)。2009年至2015年年中治疗的所有AK、BD和BCC纳入分析。所有患者均有完整的数据集。除非另有说明,否则使用Pearson卡方检验、独立样本t检验和单因素方差分析来获得p值。使用二元逻辑回归计算优势比(OR)和95%置信区间(CI)。为了二元逻辑回归的目的,通过将VAPS分为中位数为40(1-40和41-100)的两组来定义二分类疼痛反应。共分析109例患者200例AK、BD和BCC。平均年龄74.6岁(标准差[SD] 9.55,范围33-96)。男女比例为61:39。69%的病变位于四肢,17%位于躯干,14%位于头颈。54%的病变为BD, 24%为BCC, 22%为AK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信