Physicians should not Shackle Non-physician Healthcare Providers

E. Timmons
{"title":"Physicians should not Shackle Non-physician Healthcare Providers","authors":"E. Timmons","doi":"10.4172/2329-6879.1000259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Occupational licensing laws specify the tasks or “scope of practice” that non-physician healthcare providers are allowed to perform by law. Physicians have significant influence on these laws directly via their position on state licensing boards and also indirectly by influencing state legislators with professional association lobbying. Individual states have the authority to specify professional scope of practice and this results in some interesting differences across states. For example, the state of Kentucky is the only state [3] in the United States that does not allow physician assistants the authority to prescribe controlled substances with physician supervision. This places a clear limitation on the ability of physician assistants to provide care to vulnerable populations in the state.","PeriodicalId":19397,"journal":{"name":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational medicine and health affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2329-6879.1000259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Occupational licensing laws specify the tasks or “scope of practice” that non-physician healthcare providers are allowed to perform by law. Physicians have significant influence on these laws directly via their position on state licensing boards and also indirectly by influencing state legislators with professional association lobbying. Individual states have the authority to specify professional scope of practice and this results in some interesting differences across states. For example, the state of Kentucky is the only state [3] in the United States that does not allow physician assistants the authority to prescribe controlled substances with physician supervision. This places a clear limitation on the ability of physician assistants to provide care to vulnerable populations in the state.
医生不应该束缚非医生医疗保健提供者
职业许可法规定了法律允许非医师医疗保健提供者执行的任务或“执业范围”。医生通过在州执照委员会的职位直接对这些法律产生重大影响,也通过专业协会游说间接影响州立法者。各州有权指定专业实践范围,这导致各州之间存在一些有趣的差异。例如,肯塔基州是美国唯一一个不允许医师助理在医师监督下开受控药物的州[3]。这明显限制了医师助理为该州弱势群体提供护理的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信