Neonicotinoids in U.S. Maize: Insecticide Substitution Effects and Environmental Risk

Edward D. Perry, G. Moschini
{"title":"Neonicotinoids in U.S. Maize: Insecticide Substitution Effects and Environmental Risk","authors":"Edward D. Perry, G. Moschini","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3396781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study exploits a novel dataset containing more than 89,000 farm-level surveys over a 17-year period to investigate how neonicotinoid seed treatments in maize, now ubiquitous, have affected the use of other insecticides. Neonicotinoid insecticides are the most used class of insecticides in the world, but they are controversial because of their high toxicity to honeybees. In the United States, maize production accounts for the majority of neonicotinoid use, mostly as seed treatments. We find that neonicotinoids substituted for other major insecticides: plots planted with neonicotinoid-treated seeds were 52% and 47% less likely to be treated with a pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticide, respectively. Although honeybees have been put at greater risk by neonicotinoids, the changed pattern of pest control instruments has reduced toxicity risk for mammals, birds, and fish. We also find that adoption of genetically engineered insect-resistant maize varieties significantly reduced the use of organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides, thereby reducing toxicity exposure to all examined taxa. Policies aimed at restricting neonicotinoid use may need to account for undesirable unintended consequences.","PeriodicalId":11510,"journal":{"name":"Ecology eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3396781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study exploits a novel dataset containing more than 89,000 farm-level surveys over a 17-year period to investigate how neonicotinoid seed treatments in maize, now ubiquitous, have affected the use of other insecticides. Neonicotinoid insecticides are the most used class of insecticides in the world, but they are controversial because of their high toxicity to honeybees. In the United States, maize production accounts for the majority of neonicotinoid use, mostly as seed treatments. We find that neonicotinoids substituted for other major insecticides: plots planted with neonicotinoid-treated seeds were 52% and 47% less likely to be treated with a pyrethroid and organophosphate insecticide, respectively. Although honeybees have been put at greater risk by neonicotinoids, the changed pattern of pest control instruments has reduced toxicity risk for mammals, birds, and fish. We also find that adoption of genetically engineered insect-resistant maize varieties significantly reduced the use of organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides, thereby reducing toxicity exposure to all examined taxa. Policies aimed at restricting neonicotinoid use may need to account for undesirable unintended consequences.
美国玉米中的新烟碱:杀虫剂替代效应和环境风险
这项研究利用了一个新的数据集,其中包含17年期间89,000多个农场层面的调查,以调查现在普遍存在的玉米新烟碱类种子处理如何影响其他杀虫剂的使用。新烟碱类杀虫剂是世界上使用最多的一类杀虫剂,但由于它们对蜜蜂的高毒性而引起争议。在美国,玉米生产占新烟碱使用的大部分,主要用于种子处理。我们发现,新烟碱类杀虫剂取代了其他主要杀虫剂:种植了新烟碱类杀虫剂处理过的种子的小区,使用拟除虫菊酯和有机磷杀虫剂的可能性分别降低了52%和47%。虽然蜜蜂受到新烟碱类杀虫剂的危害更大,但虫害防治手段的改变降低了对哺乳动物、鸟类和鱼类的毒性风险。我们还发现,采用转基因抗虫玉米品种显著减少了有机磷和拟除虫菊酯杀虫剂的使用,从而减少了对所有研究分类群的毒性暴露。旨在限制新烟碱类药物使用的政策可能需要考虑到意想不到的不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信