Contamination of wildlife with DDT insecticide residues in relation to tsetse fly control operations in Zimbabwe

Peter Matthiessen
{"title":"Contamination of wildlife with DDT insecticide residues in relation to tsetse fly control operations in Zimbabwe","authors":"Peter Matthiessen","doi":"10.1016/0143-148X(85)90043-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The distribution of DDT insecticide residues in the environment of western Zimbabwe was surveyed in order to identify the major source(s) of DDT pollution and assess whether residue accumulation in wildlife is sufficient to cause deleterious biological effects. The most important source of DDT contamination in 1982/83 was the tsetse fly control programme, with relatively minor contributions made by mosquito control, commercial agriculture and traditional farming. Although it was shown that DDT residues do not persist in the non-living environment (tree bark, soil, riverine silt), they readily accumulate in insectivorous birds and bats (respective maxima: 32 and 20 μg g<sup>−1</sup> wet weight total DDT in viscera) and, to a lesser extent, in detritivorous mussels and piscivorous fish (maxima: 1·0 and 2·2 μg g<sup>−1</sup> in whole body and ovary, respectively). These residues are sufficient to cause eggshell thinning in certain avian predators.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100484,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical","volume":"10 3","pages":"Pages 189-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0143-148X(85)90043-6","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution Series B, Chemical and Physical","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0143148X85900436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

The distribution of DDT insecticide residues in the environment of western Zimbabwe was surveyed in order to identify the major source(s) of DDT pollution and assess whether residue accumulation in wildlife is sufficient to cause deleterious biological effects. The most important source of DDT contamination in 1982/83 was the tsetse fly control programme, with relatively minor contributions made by mosquito control, commercial agriculture and traditional farming. Although it was shown that DDT residues do not persist in the non-living environment (tree bark, soil, riverine silt), they readily accumulate in insectivorous birds and bats (respective maxima: 32 and 20 μg g−1 wet weight total DDT in viscera) and, to a lesser extent, in detritivorous mussels and piscivorous fish (maxima: 1·0 and 2·2 μg g−1 in whole body and ovary, respectively). These residues are sufficient to cause eggshell thinning in certain avian predators.

与津巴布韦采采蝇控制行动有关的滴滴涕杀虫剂残留物对野生动物的污染
调查了津巴布韦西部环境中滴滴涕杀虫剂残留的分布情况,以确定滴滴涕污染的主要来源,并评估滴滴涕残留在野生动物中的积累是否足以造成有害的生物效应。1982/83年滴滴涕污染的最重要来源是采采蝇控制方案,蚊虫控制、商业农业和传统农业的贡献相对较小。虽然滴滴涕残留不会在非生物环境(树皮、土壤、河流淤泥)中持续存在,但它们很容易在食虫鸟类和蝙蝠中积累(其内脏中滴滴涕的湿重最大值分别为32和20 μg−1),在营养贻贝和食鱼鱼类中积累的程度较小(其全身和卵巢中滴滴涕的湿重最大值分别为1.0和2.2 μg−1)。这些残留物足以导致某些鸟类捕食者蛋壳变薄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信