An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve Co-management Approach in Kenya

Felix Lamech Mogambi Ming’ate
{"title":"An Evaluation of the Implementation of the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve Co-management Approach in Kenya","authors":"Felix Lamech Mogambi Ming’ate","doi":"10.1080/00128325.2018.1436842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Several studies have been conducted on the implementation of co-management of forests. There is a significant gap in the current literature regarding the extent to which the implementation of co-management regimes is having an effect. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve (ASFR) co-management approach in Kenya with the aim of understanding its current status and what needs to be done to improve the co-management approach in developing countries. The paper also provides insights into policy options for implementing a co-management approach. The ASFR has been in operation for over two decades thus making it an important example for evaluating implementation, as one could expect it to have established discernible criteria for evaluation. Information was gathered from a combination of participant observations and interviews with key players in the Arabuko-Sokoke co-management team. To analyse data, all audio-recorded interviews were checked for audibility prior to transcribing and transcripts were then quality checked by comparing them with the original interview recordings. Similar themes were grouped together to answer the study objectives. The results highlight six areas that are critical for the successful implementation of a co-management approach: legalizing co-management; adequate involvement of communities in the enforcement of co-management rules; provision of adequate safety for community members threatened by illegal operations; establishment of clear individual household boundaries; designing long-term income-generating activities; and strongly supporting the establishment of co-management for the entire forest. It is concluded that co-management is viable but requires adjustments as new issues emerge.","PeriodicalId":11421,"journal":{"name":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"227 - 235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2018.1436842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT Several studies have been conducted on the implementation of co-management of forests. There is a significant gap in the current literature regarding the extent to which the implementation of co-management regimes is having an effect. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the implementation of the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve (ASFR) co-management approach in Kenya with the aim of understanding its current status and what needs to be done to improve the co-management approach in developing countries. The paper also provides insights into policy options for implementing a co-management approach. The ASFR has been in operation for over two decades thus making it an important example for evaluating implementation, as one could expect it to have established discernible criteria for evaluation. Information was gathered from a combination of participant observations and interviews with key players in the Arabuko-Sokoke co-management team. To analyse data, all audio-recorded interviews were checked for audibility prior to transcribing and transcripts were then quality checked by comparing them with the original interview recordings. Similar themes were grouped together to answer the study objectives. The results highlight six areas that are critical for the successful implementation of a co-management approach: legalizing co-management; adequate involvement of communities in the enforcement of co-management rules; provision of adequate safety for community members threatened by illegal operations; establishment of clear individual household boundaries; designing long-term income-generating activities; and strongly supporting the establishment of co-management for the entire forest. It is concluded that co-management is viable but requires adjustments as new issues emerge.
对肯尼亚阿拉巴库-索科克森林保护区共同管理办法实施情况的评价
关于森林共同管理的实施已经进行了几项研究。在目前的文献中,关于共同管理制度的实施在多大程度上产生了影响,存在很大的差距。本文的目的是评估阿拉巴库-索科克森林保护区(ASFR)共同管理方法在肯尼亚的实施情况,目的是了解其现状以及需要做些什么来改进发展中国家的共同管理方法。本文还提供了实施共同管理方法的政策选择的见解。ASFR已经运行了二十多年,因此使其成为评估实施情况的一个重要例子,因为人们可以期望它已经建立了可识别的评估标准。通过参与者观察和对Arabuko-Sokoke共同管理团队主要参与者的采访收集信息。为了分析数据,在转录之前检查所有录音采访的可听性,然后通过将其与原始采访录音进行比较来检查笔录的质量。相似的主题被组合在一起以回答研究目标。研究结果强调了成功实施共同管理方法的六个关键领域:使共同管理合法化;社区充分参与执行共同管理规则;为受到非法经营威胁的社区成员提供足够的安全;建立清晰的个体家庭界限;设计长期创收活动;并大力支持建立对整个森林的共同管理。结论是,共同管理是可行的,但需要随着新问题的出现进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信