Bayesian model comparison for mortality forecasting

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jackie S. T. Wong, J. Forster, Peter W. F. Smith
{"title":"Bayesian model comparison for mortality forecasting","authors":"Jackie S. T. Wong, J. Forster, Peter W. F. Smith","doi":"10.1093/jrsssc/qlad021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Stochastic models are appealing for mortality forecasting in their ability to generate intervals that quantify uncertainties underlying the forecasts. We present a fully Bayesian implementation of the age-period-cohort-improvement (APCI) model with overdispersion, which is compared with the Lee–Carter model with cohorts. We show that naive prior specification can yield misleading inferences, where we propose Laplace prior as an elegant solution. We also perform model averaging to incorporate model uncertainty. Our findings indicate that the APCI model offers better fit and forecast for England and Wales data spanning 1961–2002. Our approach also allows coherent inclusion of multiple sources of uncertainty, producing well-calibrated probabilistic intervals.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jrsssc/qlad021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Stochastic models are appealing for mortality forecasting in their ability to generate intervals that quantify uncertainties underlying the forecasts. We present a fully Bayesian implementation of the age-period-cohort-improvement (APCI) model with overdispersion, which is compared with the Lee–Carter model with cohorts. We show that naive prior specification can yield misleading inferences, where we propose Laplace prior as an elegant solution. We also perform model averaging to incorporate model uncertainty. Our findings indicate that the APCI model offers better fit and forecast for England and Wales data spanning 1961–2002. Our approach also allows coherent inclusion of multiple sources of uncertainty, producing well-calibrated probabilistic intervals.
死亡率预测的贝叶斯模型比较
随机模型在死亡率预测中很有吸引力,因为它们能够产生区间,量化预测背后的不确定性。我们提出了具有过分散的年龄-时期-队列改善(APCI)模型的完全贝叶斯实现,并将其与具有队列的Lee-Carter模型进行了比较。我们表明朴素的先验规范可以产生误导性的推论,其中我们提出拉普拉斯先验作为一个优雅的解决方案。我们还执行模型平均以纳入模型不确定性。研究结果表明,APCI模型对英格兰和威尔士1961-2002年的数据具有较好的拟合和预测效果。我们的方法还允许连贯地包含多个不确定性来源,产生校准良好的概率区间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信