A Very Personal Breakthrough

IF 0.8 Q2 AREA STUDIES

Israel Studies Review Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.3167/isr.2023.380203

David J. Wilcox

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the role of interpersonal trust (IPT) in establishing and developing the 1992–1993 Oslo Channel by drawing on a number of interviews alongside available English-language discursive material. The central argument is that IPT developed in two specific dyadic relationships in the Oslo Channel: between Dr. Yair Hirschfeld and Ahmed Qurei, and then between Qurei and Uri Savir. These relationships underpinned the development of the Oslo Channel. To support this argument, I examine the 1991–1993 Washington negotiations and demonstrate that IPT did not develop there. To analyze the relationships discussed in this article, I draw extensively on interdisciplinary literature on trust, examining how the basis for IPT changes in these dyads as the relationships develop. This article complements the existing literature on the Oslo Channel by examining the relationships between key individuals on the Israeli and Palestinian side.

查看原文本刊更多论文

一个非常个人的突破

本文通过引用一些访谈和可用的英语话语材料，考察了人际信任(IPT)在1992-1993年奥斯陆频道的建立和发展中的作用。核心论点是，IPT是在奥斯陆海峡的两个特定的二元关系中发展起来的:在Yair Hirschfeld博士和Ahmed Qurei之间，然后在Qurei和Uri Savir之间。这些关系是奥斯陆海峡发展的基础。为了支持这一论点，我考察了1991-1993年的华盛顿谈判，并证明国际和平谈判并没有在那里发展起来。为了分析本文中讨论的关系，我广泛引用了关于信任的跨学科文献，研究了IPT的基础如何随着关系的发展而变化。本文通过考察以色列和巴勒斯坦方面关键人物之间的关系，补充了关于奥斯陆海峡的现有文献。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Israel Studies Review AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Israel Studies Review (ISR) is the journal of the Association for Israel Studies, an international and interdisciplinary scholarly organization dedicated to the study of all aspects of Israeli society, history, politics, and culture. ISR explores modern and contemporary Israel from the perspective of the social sciences, history, the humanities, and cultural studies and welcomes submissions on these subjects. The journal also pays close attention to the relationships of Israel to the Middle East and to the wider world, and encourages scholarly articles with this broader theoretical or comparative approach provided the focus remains on modern Israel.