Clinical Profile and Acute-Phase Management Modalities of Pediatric Hand Burn: A Retrospective Study.

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kayhan Gurbuz, Mete Demir
{"title":"Clinical Profile and Acute-Phase Management Modalities of Pediatric Hand Burn: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Kayhan Gurbuz, Mete Demir","doi":"10.3390/ebj3010005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the hands constitute approximately 5% of the total body surface area (TBSA), the sequelae and subsequent functional outcomes following hand burns (HBs) significantly impact the quality of life for affected patients. HBs, which frequently accompany severe burns and are often neglected, deserve additional attention in the management of burns of this anatomical region, as they are responsible for a majority of postburn morbidity. In addition, many questions remain unanswered in almost every aspect of HB management. Moreover, recent articles suggest that the primary issue of optimal timing concerning skin closure for HBs, which seemed well answered, has been questioned, and even this fundamental question may require further investigation. Appropriate initial management of HBs commencing from the acute phase in children remains of great importance in optimizing functional outcomes and minimizing long-term scar formation. In this context, our primary purpose in this retrospective cohort study was to present the epidemiological characteristics of HBs in children as a whole and to discuss the incidence and mechanisms, in addition to the outcomes of superficial and deep HB acute-phase management modalities. During the 5-year study period, HBs were detected in 27% (<i>n</i> = 422) of 1580 hospitalized pediatric burn patients in the Adana Faculty of Medicine-University of Health Sciences (AFM-UHS) Burn Center. Movement and functional status of the hands were evaluated with a simple qualitative staging system adapted from the original scoring tools used by Stiefel et al., and Sheridan et al. Good, moderate, and poor scores in the study were graded as Category A, Category B, and Category C, respectively. According to the hand movement and function assessment categorization, 84% of the cases were observed as Category-A who had good/normal regular movements/functions of the hands/fingers, followed by Category-B and -C with percentages of 15 and 1, respectively, during the 5.8 ± 3.4 month follow-up period.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"29 4 1","pages":"34-42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj3010005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the hands constitute approximately 5% of the total body surface area (TBSA), the sequelae and subsequent functional outcomes following hand burns (HBs) significantly impact the quality of life for affected patients. HBs, which frequently accompany severe burns and are often neglected, deserve additional attention in the management of burns of this anatomical region, as they are responsible for a majority of postburn morbidity. In addition, many questions remain unanswered in almost every aspect of HB management. Moreover, recent articles suggest that the primary issue of optimal timing concerning skin closure for HBs, which seemed well answered, has been questioned, and even this fundamental question may require further investigation. Appropriate initial management of HBs commencing from the acute phase in children remains of great importance in optimizing functional outcomes and minimizing long-term scar formation. In this context, our primary purpose in this retrospective cohort study was to present the epidemiological characteristics of HBs in children as a whole and to discuss the incidence and mechanisms, in addition to the outcomes of superficial and deep HB acute-phase management modalities. During the 5-year study period, HBs were detected in 27% (n = 422) of 1580 hospitalized pediatric burn patients in the Adana Faculty of Medicine-University of Health Sciences (AFM-UHS) Burn Center. Movement and functional status of the hands were evaluated with a simple qualitative staging system adapted from the original scoring tools used by Stiefel et al., and Sheridan et al. Good, moderate, and poor scores in the study were graded as Category A, Category B, and Category C, respectively. According to the hand movement and function assessment categorization, 84% of the cases were observed as Category-A who had good/normal regular movements/functions of the hands/fingers, followed by Category-B and -C with percentages of 15 and 1, respectively, during the 5.8 ± 3.4 month follow-up period.

小儿手部烧伤的临床特征和急性期处理方式:一项回顾性研究。
虽然手部约占体表总面积(TBSA)的 5%,但手部烧伤(HBs)后的后遗症和随后的功能性结果会严重影响患者的生活质量。手部烧伤常常伴随着严重烧伤,而且经常被忽视,在处理这一解剖区域的烧伤时,应给予更多关注,因为烧伤后发病率的大部分都是由手部烧伤引起的。此外,在 HB 治疗的几乎所有方面,仍有许多问题没有答案。此外,最近的文章表明,关于 HB 皮肤闭合最佳时机的首要问题似乎已经有了很好的答案,但现在又受到了质疑,甚至这个根本性的问题也可能需要进一步研究。从急性期开始对儿童 HBs 进行适当的初始治疗,对于优化功能结果和减少长期疤痕的形成仍然非常重要。在这种情况下,我们进行这项回顾性队列研究的主要目的是介绍儿童 HBs 的整体流行病学特征,并讨论其发病率、发病机制以及浅表和深部 HB 急性期处理方式的结果。在为期5年的研究期间,阿达纳医学院-卫生科学大学烧伤中心(AFM-UHS)的1580名住院小儿烧伤患者中有27%(n = 422)被检测出患有HBs。研究中的良好、中等和较差评分分别被划分为 A 类、B 类和 C 类。根据手部运动和功能评估分类,在 5.8 ± 3.4 个月的随访期间,84% 的病例被观察到手部/手指有良好/正常的常规运动/功能,其次是 B 类和 C 类,比例分别为 15 和 1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信