‘Defunding the police’: A consideration of the implications for the police role in mental health work

I. Cummins
{"title":"‘Defunding the police’: A consideration of the implications for the police role in mental health work","authors":"I. Cummins","doi":"10.1177/0032258X211047795","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the role of the police in mental health work. It explores whether the calls to ‘defund the police’ can be the basis for fundamental reforms of mental health services and the police role. The paper outlines the roots of the calls to ‘defund the police’ situating the perspective in the wider Black Lives Matter movement (BLM). The wider BLM movement seeks to overturn long standing racial and social injustices, including the disproportionate use of force against black citizens and racial biases within the Criminal Justice System. It goes further in that BLM calls for a shift in funding from policing towards an investment in welfare and community services. These calls are captured in the phrase ‘defund the police’. These calls have highlighted the police role in mental health, particularly, the police response to citizens in mental health crisis. The paper examines the police role in mental health work, highlighting the historic impact of policies of deinstutionalisation and more recently austerity and welfare retrenchment. In calling for this policy shift, campaigners have highlighted the need to significant investment in mental health services. The police role in mental health services increased because of the failings of community care (Cummins, 2020a). Police officers have increasingly become first responders in mental health crises. The paper, focusing on England and Wales, uses ‘defund the police’ perspective as a lens to examine long standing areas of concern. Police involvement in mental health emergencies is inevitably stigmatizing. There are also concerns from the police. This is an area of police demand that has grown of austerity and the wider retrenchment in public services. Police officers often feel that they lack the skills and knowledge required to undertake their role in mental health work. In addition, there is frustration generated by poor interprofessional working. Police officers on an organizational and individual level feel that they are often left ‘picking up the pieces’. There is a wide recognition that mental health services are failing to provide appropriate responses to those in crisis (Wessley, 2018). As well as being an issue of human rights and social justice, these failures place vulnerable people at increased risk. All aspects of police work involve contact with people experiencing mental health problems. People with mental health problems are first and foremost human beings who should be treated with dignity and respect. They are also citizens, family members, carers and work colleagues. Having acknowledged that core value perspective, if we accept that police officers will be involved in mental health work, we should seek to limit their role as far as is possible. The paper concludes that it is likely that there will be always be some form of police involvement in mental health–related work. However, there is a need to limit this as far as possible.","PeriodicalId":87373,"journal":{"name":"The police journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The police journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0032258X211047795","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper examines the role of the police in mental health work. It explores whether the calls to ‘defund the police’ can be the basis for fundamental reforms of mental health services and the police role. The paper outlines the roots of the calls to ‘defund the police’ situating the perspective in the wider Black Lives Matter movement (BLM). The wider BLM movement seeks to overturn long standing racial and social injustices, including the disproportionate use of force against black citizens and racial biases within the Criminal Justice System. It goes further in that BLM calls for a shift in funding from policing towards an investment in welfare and community services. These calls are captured in the phrase ‘defund the police’. These calls have highlighted the police role in mental health, particularly, the police response to citizens in mental health crisis. The paper examines the police role in mental health work, highlighting the historic impact of policies of deinstutionalisation and more recently austerity and welfare retrenchment. In calling for this policy shift, campaigners have highlighted the need to significant investment in mental health services. The police role in mental health services increased because of the failings of community care (Cummins, 2020a). Police officers have increasingly become first responders in mental health crises. The paper, focusing on England and Wales, uses ‘defund the police’ perspective as a lens to examine long standing areas of concern. Police involvement in mental health emergencies is inevitably stigmatizing. There are also concerns from the police. This is an area of police demand that has grown of austerity and the wider retrenchment in public services. Police officers often feel that they lack the skills and knowledge required to undertake their role in mental health work. In addition, there is frustration generated by poor interprofessional working. Police officers on an organizational and individual level feel that they are often left ‘picking up the pieces’. There is a wide recognition that mental health services are failing to provide appropriate responses to those in crisis (Wessley, 2018). As well as being an issue of human rights and social justice, these failures place vulnerable people at increased risk. All aspects of police work involve contact with people experiencing mental health problems. People with mental health problems are first and foremost human beings who should be treated with dignity and respect. They are also citizens, family members, carers and work colleagues. Having acknowledged that core value perspective, if we accept that police officers will be involved in mental health work, we should seek to limit their role as far as is possible. The paper concludes that it is likely that there will be always be some form of police involvement in mental health–related work. However, there is a need to limit this as far as possible.
“取消对警察的资助”:对警察在精神卫生工作中的作用的影响的考虑
本文探讨了警察在心理健康工作中的作用。它探讨了“解除警察资金”的呼吁是否可以成为精神卫生服务和警察角色的根本改革的基础。本文概述了呼吁“解除对警察的资助”的根源,将这一观点置于更广泛的“黑人的命也是命”运动(BLM)中。更广泛的BLM运动寻求推翻长期存在的种族和社会不公正,包括对黑人公民过度使用武力和刑事司法系统中的种族偏见。此外,BLM还呼吁将资金从维持治安转向投资福利和社区服务。这些呼吁在短语“解散警察”中得到了体现。这些呼吁强调了警察在心理健康方面的作用,特别是警察对处于心理健康危机中的公民的反应。本文考察了警察在心理健康工作中的作用,强调了去机构化政策和最近的紧缩和福利削减的历史影响。在呼吁这一政策转变的过程中,活动人士强调了对心理健康服务进行大量投资的必要性。由于社区护理的失败,警察在精神卫生服务中的作用增加了(康明斯,2020a)。警察越来越多地成为心理健康危机的第一响应者。这篇论文以英格兰和威尔士为重点,以“解除警察资金”的视角来审视长期存在的问题。警察卷入精神卫生紧急事件不可避免地会使人蒙受耻辱。警方也对此表示担忧。这是一个警察需求增长的领域,因为财政紧缩和公共服务的广泛紧缩。警官经常感到他们缺乏在精神卫生工作中发挥作用所需的技能和知识。此外,糟糕的跨专业工作也会产生挫败感。无论是在组织层面还是个人层面上,警察都觉得他们经常被留下来“收拾残局”。人们普遍认识到,精神卫生服务未能为处于危机中的人提供适当的反应(韦斯利,2018)。这些失败不仅是人权和社会正义问题,还使弱势群体面临更大的风险。警察工作的所有方面都涉及与有精神健康问题的人接触。有精神健康问题的人首先是人,应该得到有尊严和尊重的对待。他们也是公民、家庭成员、照顾者和工作同事。在承认了这一核心价值观点之后,如果我们接受警察将参与心理健康工作,我们应该尽可能地限制他们的作用。这篇论文的结论是,很可能总是会有某种形式的警察参与到与心理健康相关的工作中。然而,有必要尽可能地限制这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信