Psycho-sensorial categories: Actions and behaviors of piano practice at different levels of expertise

IF 0.2 0 MUSIC
Opus Pub Date : 2022-08-29 DOI:10.20504/opus2022.28.10
Michele Rosita Mantovani, Regina Antunes Teixeira dos Santos
{"title":"Psycho-sensorial categories: Actions and behaviors of piano practice at different levels of expertise","authors":"Michele Rosita Mantovani, Regina Antunes Teixeira dos Santos","doi":"10.20504/opus2022.28.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current literature, instrumental practice dealing with elementary levels of expertise tends to be underestimated compared to that of professional musicians. Therefore, the purpose of the present research was to investigate actions and behaviors in piano practice carried out by pianists belonging of different levels of expertise. In a case-study approach guided by phenomenological principles, four participants were selected according to their potential representativeness at different levels of expertise, their received formal piano instruction, and accumulated practice time. The participants were asked to record one practice session of two piano pieces from their current repertoire. They were instructed to select one piece that they considered more challenging (piece 1) and another piece that they considered less challenging (piece 2). Semi-structured interviews provided information about their strategies. Nine categories were proposed as characteristic actions and behaviors of piano practice within the scope of the classical Western music tradition, namely, testing, repeating, isolating, alternating, exploring, adjusting, pausing, straggling, and slipping. Such categories proved to be common for all participants, exemplified by the practices of four participants (precollege, undergraduate, graduate students and professional pianists), and provided evidence of the nuances of deliberation, such as the procedures to approach and improve the repertoire (and their effectiveness), the effort to stay engaged and on task, and some of the limits in attention to practice.","PeriodicalId":42804,"journal":{"name":"Opus","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20504/opus2022.28.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current literature, instrumental practice dealing with elementary levels of expertise tends to be underestimated compared to that of professional musicians. Therefore, the purpose of the present research was to investigate actions and behaviors in piano practice carried out by pianists belonging of different levels of expertise. In a case-study approach guided by phenomenological principles, four participants were selected according to their potential representativeness at different levels of expertise, their received formal piano instruction, and accumulated practice time. The participants were asked to record one practice session of two piano pieces from their current repertoire. They were instructed to select one piece that they considered more challenging (piece 1) and another piece that they considered less challenging (piece 2). Semi-structured interviews provided information about their strategies. Nine categories were proposed as characteristic actions and behaviors of piano practice within the scope of the classical Western music tradition, namely, testing, repeating, isolating, alternating, exploring, adjusting, pausing, straggling, and slipping. Such categories proved to be common for all participants, exemplified by the practices of four participants (precollege, undergraduate, graduate students and professional pianists), and provided evidence of the nuances of deliberation, such as the procedures to approach and improve the repertoire (and their effectiveness), the effort to stay engaged and on task, and some of the limits in attention to practice.
心理-感觉范畴:不同专业水平下钢琴练习的行动和行为
在目前的文献中,与专业音乐家相比,处理初级专业水平的器乐实践往往被低估。因此,本研究的目的是调查属于不同专业水平的钢琴家在钢琴练习中的行动和行为。采用现象学原理指导下的个案研究法,根据不同专业水平的潜在代表性、接受过正规钢琴教学和积累的练习时间,选择了四名参与者。参与者被要求从他们当前的曲目中录制两首钢琴曲的一次练习。他们被要求选择一篇他们认为更具挑战性的文章(第1篇)和另一篇他们认为不那么具有挑战性的文章(第2篇)。半结构化访谈提供了他们的策略信息。在西方古典音乐传统范围内,提出了九种钢琴练习的特征动作和行为,即测试、重复、孤立、交替、探索、调整、暂停、散乱、滑动。事实证明,这些类别对所有参与者都是普遍的,四个参与者(大学预科生、本科生、研究生和专业钢琴家)的实践就是例证,并提供了审议的细微差别的证据,例如接近和改进曲目(及其有效性)的程序,保持参与和专注于任务的努力,以及对练习的一些限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Opus
Opus MUSIC-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1989, OPUS is a four-monthly journal with the aim to widely promote musical knowledge by exploring practical, theoretical, historical, political, cultural and/or interdisciplinary aspects of music while fostering innovative technical perspectives. A scientific journal of the Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação em Música [National Association of Music Research and Postgraduate] — ANPPOM — its primary focus is to provide a broad overview of the most representative research on music in Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书