Carbon to nitrogen ratio and quantity of organic amendment interactively affect crop growth and soil mineral N retention

Maartje van der Sloot , David Kleijn , Gerlinde B. De Deyn , Juul Limpens
{"title":"Carbon to nitrogen ratio and quantity of organic amendment interactively affect crop growth and soil mineral N retention","authors":"Maartje van der Sloot ,&nbsp;David Kleijn ,&nbsp;Gerlinde B. De Deyn ,&nbsp;Juul Limpens","doi":"10.1016/j.crope.2022.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using organic amendments to improve arable soils in the long term is a careful balancing act of applying amendments with the right carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N ratio) at adequate quantity to avoid nitrogen (N) leaching while promoting or retaining crop growth in the short term. So far, most studies examining the relationship between C:N ratio and N mineralization and immobilization were done without plants. In this study we explored how crop biomass and N leaching change with increasing C:N ratio and quantity of organic amendments to arable soil. We conducted an open-air mesocosm experiment with organic amendments application across a range in C:N ratio (10 to 60) and quantity (10 to 50 ton ha<sup>-1</sup>) to sandy arable soil using a full-factorial design. Spring wheat was planted and grown for six months during which three rainfall events were simulated to test treatment effects on N leaching. Applying amendments with a C:N ratio of 20 and higher decreased crop biomass and increased mineral soil N, while amendments with a C:N ratio of 10 had the opposite effect. Applying larger quantities of amendments reinforced the effect of the C:N ratio on crop biomass. N leaching remained unaffected by either amendment C:N ratio or quantity or even mineral fertilizer as N leaching only occurred in the control treatment without plants. Our results suggests that growing a crop is adequate to prevent N leaching. Applying organic amendments do not pose a different risk regarding N leaching when compared to mineral fertilizer and slurry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100340,"journal":{"name":"Crop and Environment","volume":"1 3","pages":"Pages 161-167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X22000338/pdfft?md5=68e44a3d801db7a118b5933f7e53712b&pid=1-s2.0-S2773126X22000338-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773126X22000338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Using organic amendments to improve arable soils in the long term is a careful balancing act of applying amendments with the right carbon to nitrogen ratio (C:N ratio) at adequate quantity to avoid nitrogen (N) leaching while promoting or retaining crop growth in the short term. So far, most studies examining the relationship between C:N ratio and N mineralization and immobilization were done without plants. In this study we explored how crop biomass and N leaching change with increasing C:N ratio and quantity of organic amendments to arable soil. We conducted an open-air mesocosm experiment with organic amendments application across a range in C:N ratio (10 to 60) and quantity (10 to 50 ton ha-1) to sandy arable soil using a full-factorial design. Spring wheat was planted and grown for six months during which three rainfall events were simulated to test treatment effects on N leaching. Applying amendments with a C:N ratio of 20 and higher decreased crop biomass and increased mineral soil N, while amendments with a C:N ratio of 10 had the opposite effect. Applying larger quantities of amendments reinforced the effect of the C:N ratio on crop biomass. N leaching remained unaffected by either amendment C:N ratio or quantity or even mineral fertilizer as N leaching only occurred in the control treatment without plants. Our results suggests that growing a crop is adequate to prevent N leaching. Applying organic amendments do not pose a different risk regarding N leaching when compared to mineral fertilizer and slurry.

碳氮比和有机改良量对作物生长和土壤矿质氮保持有交互影响
长期使用有机改良剂改善耕地土壤是一种谨慎的平衡行为,在适当的量上施用适当的碳氮比(C:N比)的改良剂,以避免氮(N)淋失,同时在短期内促进或保持作物生长。到目前为止,大多数研究碳氮比与氮矿化和固定关系的研究都是在没有植物的情况下进行的。本研究探讨了作物生物量和氮淋失随土壤碳氮比和有机改良剂用量的增加而变化的规律。采用全因子设计,在沙质耕地土壤中进行了C:N比(10 ~ 60)和量(10 ~ 50吨/公顷)范围内施用有机改进剂的露天中观试验。以春小麦为研究对象,在6个月的种植和生长过程中,模拟了3种不同降雨条件对氮素淋溶的影响。碳氮比为20及以上的改良剂降低了作物生物量,增加了矿质土壤氮,而碳氮比为10的改良剂则产生相反的效果。施用大量改良剂增强了碳氮比对作物生物量的影响。氮素淋溶不受C:N比、数量甚至矿物肥的影响,因为氮素淋溶只发生在不施用植物的对照处理中。我们的研究结果表明,种植作物足以防止氮淋失。与矿肥和泥浆相比,施用有机改进剂不会对N浸出造成不同的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信