Indian South Africans as a middleman minority: Historical and contemporary perspectives

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Vernon D. Johnson
{"title":"Indian South Africans as a middleman minority: Historical and contemporary perspectives","authors":"Vernon D. Johnson","doi":"10.54146/newcontree/2022/89/03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Beginning in the 1940s, a literature on middleman minorities emerged to demystify the intermediary economic niche that Jews had occupied in medieval Europe. They were viewed as ethnic entrepreneurs occupying the economic status gap. In the 1960s, scholars began to apply middleman minority theory to colonial societies and to American society. More recently, Coloureds in South Africa have been identified as a middleman minority of another type: semi-privileged proletarians occupying an economic status gap in labour between whites and Africans. A political status gap between whites and Africans, both seeking alliances to achieve hegemony, is also occupied by Coloureds. Among South African Indians, one finds ethnic entrepreneurs: a small shopkeeping and trading class from South Asia. But there are also Indian semi-privileged proletarians who emerged from the indentured labour population in the early twentieth century. This article employs a historical institutional approach to analyse political tensions among Indians, and examines the cleavage between Indians and other races over political rights vis-a-vis the South African state. It also offers a typology contrasting ethnic entrepreneurs with semi-privileged proletarians in terms of the differing economic status gaps they occupy. Furthermore, it illustrates how Indians occupy a political status gap in a complex settler colonial society like South Africa.","PeriodicalId":52000,"journal":{"name":"New Contree","volume":"219 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Contree","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54146/newcontree/2022/89/03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Beginning in the 1940s, a literature on middleman minorities emerged to demystify the intermediary economic niche that Jews had occupied in medieval Europe. They were viewed as ethnic entrepreneurs occupying the economic status gap. In the 1960s, scholars began to apply middleman minority theory to colonial societies and to American society. More recently, Coloureds in South Africa have been identified as a middleman minority of another type: semi-privileged proletarians occupying an economic status gap in labour between whites and Africans. A political status gap between whites and Africans, both seeking alliances to achieve hegemony, is also occupied by Coloureds. Among South African Indians, one finds ethnic entrepreneurs: a small shopkeeping and trading class from South Asia. But there are also Indian semi-privileged proletarians who emerged from the indentured labour population in the early twentieth century. This article employs a historical institutional approach to analyse political tensions among Indians, and examines the cleavage between Indians and other races over political rights vis-a-vis the South African state. It also offers a typology contrasting ethnic entrepreneurs with semi-privileged proletarians in terms of the differing economic status gaps they occupy. Furthermore, it illustrates how Indians occupy a political status gap in a complex settler colonial society like South Africa.
印度裔南非人作为中间人的少数民族:历史和当代的观点
从20世纪40年代开始,一篇关于中间商少数民族的文献出现,揭开了犹太人在中世纪欧洲占据的中介经济利基的神秘面纱。他们被视为少数民族企业家,占据着经济地位的差距。20世纪60年代,学者们开始将中间商少数群体理论应用于殖民地社会和美国社会。最近,南非的有色人种被认为是另一种类型的中间少数民族:半特权的无产者,在白人和非洲人之间的劳动经济地位上占据着差距。白人和非洲人之间的政治地位差距,都是寻求联盟以实现霸权,也被有色人种占据。在南非印度人中,你会发现少数民族企业家:一个来自南亚的小商店老板和贸易阶层。但也有印度半特权的无产者,他们在20世纪初从契约劳工人口中脱颖而出。本文采用历史制度的方法来分析印度人之间的政治紧张局势,并考察印度人和其他种族之间在南非国家政治权利方面的分歧。它还提供了一种类型学,对比少数民族企业家和半特权无产者,根据他们所占据的不同经济地位差距。此外,它还说明了印度人如何在南非这样一个复杂的移民殖民社会中占据政治地位的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Contree
New Contree HISTORY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信