The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Direct Care Providers’ Perspective

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
S. Deb, B. Limbu, G. Unwin, T. Weaver
{"title":"The Use of Medication for Challenging Behaviors in People with Intellectual Disabilities: The Direct Care Providers’ Perspective","authors":"S. Deb, B. Limbu, G. Unwin, T. Weaver","doi":"10.1080/19315864.2023.2192691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Overmedication of people with intellectual disabilities, particularly when psychotropic medications are used for challenging behavior (CB) in the absence of a psychiatric disorder, is a significant public health concern. Support staff play a pivotal role in influencing the prescribing process. Staff views and attitudes toward medication use for CB are therefore of paramount importance. Method We have conducted four focus groups involving support staff (n = 8), home managers (n = 5) and trainers (n = 3), two of which primarily explored participants’ experiences and views on using medication for CB and medication withdrawal. Results Some participants felt medication use was justified, but others saw that as a form of chemical restraint. Most agreed that polypharmacy of psychotropics might lead to side effects. Some acknowledged the lack of shared decision-making involving people with intellectual disabilities and their families. There was universal anxiety about withdrawing the medication. Conclusions All agreed on the need for more medication-related information.","PeriodicalId":45864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","volume":"78 2 1","pages":"253 - 274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19315864.2023.2192691","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Overmedication of people with intellectual disabilities, particularly when psychotropic medications are used for challenging behavior (CB) in the absence of a psychiatric disorder, is a significant public health concern. Support staff play a pivotal role in influencing the prescribing process. Staff views and attitudes toward medication use for CB are therefore of paramount importance. Method We have conducted four focus groups involving support staff (n = 8), home managers (n = 5) and trainers (n = 3), two of which primarily explored participants’ experiences and views on using medication for CB and medication withdrawal. Results Some participants felt medication use was justified, but others saw that as a form of chemical restraint. Most agreed that polypharmacy of psychotropics might lead to side effects. Some acknowledged the lack of shared decision-making involving people with intellectual disabilities and their families. There was universal anxiety about withdrawing the medication. Conclusions All agreed on the need for more medication-related information.
使用药物治疗智障人士的挑战行为:直接护理提供者的观点
背景:智力残疾患者的过度用药,特别是在没有精神障碍的情况下使用精神药物治疗挑战性行为(CB),是一个重大的公共卫生问题。支助人员在影响开处方过程中发挥关键作用。因此,员工对CB用药的看法和态度至关重要。方法开展4个焦点小组,包括支持人员(n = 8)、家庭管理人员(n = 5)和培训人员(n = 3),其中2个小组主要探讨参与者对CB用药和停药的经验和看法。结果一些参与者认为药物使用是合理的,但其他人认为这是一种化学约束。大多数人认为,精神药物的多种药物可能会导致副作用。一些人承认,缺乏让智障人士及其家庭参与的共同决策。人们普遍对停药感到焦虑。结论所有人都同意需要更多的药物相关信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信