Everyday Perspectives on Security and Insecurity in Japan: A Survey of Three Women’s Organizations

IF 1.2 4区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES
Linus Hagström, Thao-Nguyen Ha, Dan Öberg
{"title":"Everyday Perspectives on Security and Insecurity in Japan: A Survey of Three Women’s Organizations","authors":"Linus Hagström, Thao-Nguyen Ha, Dan Öberg","doi":"10.1093/SSJJ/JYAB028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The existing research on Japanese security focuses mainly on the nation state and conceives of male elites as the key bearers of relevant knowledge about the phenomenon. This article problematizes these biases by zeroing in on women’s everyday-oriented perspectives, which fall outside the scope of security politics as traditionally conceived. More specifically, it analyzes the rich material provided by a survey of the members of three major Japanese women’s organizations, using a mixed-method approach premised on statistical methods and qualitative content analysis. The results show that the Japanese women in our sample accommodate and reproduce content from dominant elite views about security and insecurity. However, they also challenge and at times ignore these perspectives by identifying a host of other insecurities as more pressing in their daily lives, notably those related to environmental degradation and Japan’s political development.","PeriodicalId":44320,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Japan Journal","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Japan Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/SSJJ/JYAB028","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The existing research on Japanese security focuses mainly on the nation state and conceives of male elites as the key bearers of relevant knowledge about the phenomenon. This article problematizes these biases by zeroing in on women’s everyday-oriented perspectives, which fall outside the scope of security politics as traditionally conceived. More specifically, it analyzes the rich material provided by a survey of the members of three major Japanese women’s organizations, using a mixed-method approach premised on statistical methods and qualitative content analysis. The results show that the Japanese women in our sample accommodate and reproduce content from dominant elite views about security and insecurity. However, they also challenge and at times ignore these perspectives by identifying a host of other insecurities as more pressing in their daily lives, notably those related to environmental degradation and Japan’s political development.
日本安全与不安全的日常视角:对三个妇女组织的调查
现有关于日本安全的研究主要集中在民族国家,并将男性精英视为有关这一现象的相关知识的关键承载者。本文通过聚焦于女性的日常视角来质疑这些偏见,这些视角超出了传统意义上的安全政治范畴。更具体地说,它采用以统计方法和定性内容分析为前提的混合方法,分析了对日本三个主要妇女组织成员的调查所提供的丰富材料。结果表明,在我们的样本中,日本女性适应并复制了主流精英对安全和不安全感的看法。然而,他们也会挑战这些观点,有时还会忽视这些观点,因为他们认为,在日常生活中,其他的不安全感更为紧迫,尤其是与环境恶化和日本政治发展有关的不安全感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
期刊介绍: Social Science Japan Journal is a new forum for original scholarly papers on modern Japan. It publishes papers that cover Japan in a comparative perspective and papers that focus on international issues that affect Japan. All social science disciplines (economics, law, political science, history, sociology, and anthropology) are represented. All papers are refereed. The journal includes a book review section with substantial reviews of books on Japanese society, written in both English and Japanese. The journal occasionally publishes reviews of the current state of social science research on Japanese society in different countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信