[Effect of 45 degree angle semirecumbent position on ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanical ventilated patients: a meta-analysis].

Yu-xin Leng, Ya-han Song, Z. Yao, Xi Zhu
{"title":"[Effect of 45 degree angle semirecumbent position on ventilator-associated pneumonia in mechanical ventilated patients: a meta-analysis].","authors":"Yu-xin Leng, Ya-han Song, Z. Yao, Xi Zhu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo systemically analyze the effect of 45 degree angle semirecumbent position on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in mechanical ventilated patients, and to evaluate whether 45 degree angle semirecumbent position is superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle head of bed (HOB).\n\n\nMETHODS\nThe randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of different HOB on the outcomes of mechanical ventilated patients were searched (from 1st January 1990 to 20th July 2012) from five databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), and Wanfang Database. Meta analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software.\n\n\nRESULTS\nData extracted from five RCTs with a total of 427 patients were analyzed. The risks of developing clinically diagnosed VAP were significantly lower among the patients in semirecumbent 45 degree angle position compared to the patients in lower position [15.96% (34/213) vs. 26.64% (57/214), relative risk (RR)=0.57, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.39 to 0.83, P=0.003], while no significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding the mortality rate [27.04% (53/196) vs. 28.22% (57/202), RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.27, P=0.66], the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-0.45, 95%CI -1.08 to 0.18, P=0.16] and the percentage of antibiotics treatment [71.11% (32/45) vs. 60.87% (28/46), RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.53, P=0.37]. Two of the five trials (91 patients) were included in the sub-analysis between 45 degree angle group (45 patients) and 25 degree angle-30 degree angle group (46 patients). The results showed that comparing with 25 degree angle-30 degree angle, 45 degree angle semirecumbent position had no significance in improving patients' clinical outcomes.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThis study proved that the clinically preferred semirecumbent 45 degree angle position did have effect in reducing the incidence of VAP, nevertheless, whether it's superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle needs to be confirmed by larger-scale, higher-quality RCTs.","PeriodicalId":23992,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","volume":"140 1","pages":"587-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.10.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To systemically analyze the effect of 45 degree angle semirecumbent position on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and other outcomes in mechanical ventilated patients, and to evaluate whether 45 degree angle semirecumbent position is superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle head of bed (HOB). METHODS The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of different HOB on the outcomes of mechanical ventilated patients were searched (from 1st January 1990 to 20th July 2012) from five databases including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, China Knowledge Resource Integrated Database (CNKI), and Wanfang Database. Meta analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.0 software. RESULTS Data extracted from five RCTs with a total of 427 patients were analyzed. The risks of developing clinically diagnosed VAP were significantly lower among the patients in semirecumbent 45 degree angle position compared to the patients in lower position [15.96% (34/213) vs. 26.64% (57/214), relative risk (RR)=0.57, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.39 to 0.83, P=0.003], while no significant differences were detected between the two groups regarding the mortality rate [27.04% (53/196) vs. 28.22% (57/202), RR=0.93, 95%CI 0.68 to 1.27, P=0.66], the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-0.45, 95%CI -1.08 to 0.18, P=0.16] and the percentage of antibiotics treatment [71.11% (32/45) vs. 60.87% (28/46), RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.53, P=0.37]. Two of the five trials (91 patients) were included in the sub-analysis between 45 degree angle group (45 patients) and 25 degree angle-30 degree angle group (46 patients). The results showed that comparing with 25 degree angle-30 degree angle, 45 degree angle semirecumbent position had no significance in improving patients' clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION This study proved that the clinically preferred semirecumbent 45 degree angle position did have effect in reducing the incidence of VAP, nevertheless, whether it's superior to 25 degree angle-30 degree angle needs to be confirmed by larger-scale, higher-quality RCTs.
[45度角半卧位对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎的影响:meta分析]。
目的系统分析45度角半卧位对机械通气患者呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率及其他结局的影响,并评价45度角半卧位是否优于25度角-30度角床头位(HOB)。方法从Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、MEDLINE、Embase、中国知识资源综合数据库(CNKI)和万方数据库(Wanfang Database) 5个数据库中检索1990年1月1日至2012年7月20日期间比较不同HOB对机械通气患者预后影响的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用RevMan 5.0软件进行Meta分析。结果从5个随机对照试验中提取数据,共427例患者进行分析。半卧45度角位患者发生临床诊断为VAP的风险明显低于低卧位患者[15.96% (34/213)vs. 26.64%(57/214),相对危险度(RR)=0.57, 95%可信区间(95% ci) 0.39 ~ 0.83, P=0.003],两组患者的死亡率差异无统计学意义[27.04% (53/196)vs. 28.22% (57/202), RR=0.93, 95% ci 0.68 ~ 1.27, P=0.66]。重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间[加权平均差(WMD)=-0.45, 95%CI = -1.08 ~ 0.18, P=0.16]和抗生素治疗百分比[71.11%(32/45)比60.87% (28/46),RR=1.14, 95%CI 0.85 ~ 1.53, P=0.37]。5个试验中的2个(91例)被纳入45度角组(45例)和25度角-30度角组(46例)的亚分析。结果显示,与25度角-30度角相比,45度角半卧位对改善患者临床疗效无显著意义。结论本研究证实临床首选的半卧45度角体位确实有降低VAP发生率的作用,但是否优于25度角-30度角体位,还需通过更大规模、更高质量的随机对照试验来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信