Blue and Black Ballpoint Pen Inks: a Systematic Review for Ink Characterization and Dating Analysis

R. Gorziza, Carina Maria Bello de Carvalho, Taísa Korndörfer, R. S. Ortiz, Marina González, Leandra Borba Leal, T. Trejos, R. Limberger
{"title":"Blue and Black Ballpoint Pen Inks: a Systematic Review for Ink Characterization and Dating Analysis","authors":"R. Gorziza, Carina Maria Bello de Carvalho, Taísa Korndörfer, R. S. Ortiz, Marina González, Leandra Borba Leal, T. Trejos, R. Limberger","doi":"10.17063/BJFS8(3)Y2019113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Documents are frequent targets of fraud and adulteration. Sometimes it is not enough to determine the document’s authenticity or authorship, but it is also necessary to demonstrate when the document was signed or written. Determining the age of a document, also known as ink dating analysis, is still a challenge for the forensic examiners. There are two main approaches for the dating of ballpoint pen inks: the static method, which is based on the characterization and identification of the ink composition and comparison to a reference collection, and the dynamic method, which involves the study of ink’s processes and alterations that occur with time, considering environmental aging factors such as light and humidity. This article aims to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the studies regarding ballpoint ink characterization and dating, in the last ten years. There are several methods, destructive and non-destructive, which are capable of characterizing and differentiating blue and black ballpoint pens that have shown applicability to the static approach. Regarding the dynamic dating methods, most studies quantified the loss of 2-phenoxyethanol (2-PE) solvent over time","PeriodicalId":9123,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Forensic Sciences, Medical Law and Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17063/BJFS8(3)Y2019113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

. Documents are frequent targets of fraud and adulteration. Sometimes it is not enough to determine the document’s authenticity or authorship, but it is also necessary to demonstrate when the document was signed or written. Determining the age of a document, also known as ink dating analysis, is still a challenge for the forensic examiners. There are two main approaches for the dating of ballpoint pen inks: the static method, which is based on the characterization and identification of the ink composition and comparison to a reference collection, and the dynamic method, which involves the study of ink’s processes and alterations that occur with time, considering environmental aging factors such as light and humidity. This article aims to provide a comprehensive systematic review of the studies regarding ballpoint ink characterization and dating, in the last ten years. There are several methods, destructive and non-destructive, which are capable of characterizing and differentiating blue and black ballpoint pens that have shown applicability to the static approach. Regarding the dynamic dating methods, most studies quantified the loss of 2-phenoxyethanol (2-PE) solvent over time
蓝色和黑色圆珠笔墨水:墨水表征和年代分析的系统综述
. 文件经常是欺诈和掺假的目标。有时,仅仅确定文件的真实性或作者身份是不够的,还需要证明文件是何时签署或撰写的。确定一份文件的年代,也被称为墨水年代分析,对法医检验员来说仍然是一个挑战。圆珠笔墨水的年代测定主要有两种方法:静态方法,它基于墨水成分的表征和鉴定,并与参考资料进行比较;动态方法,它涉及研究墨水的过程和随时间发生的变化,考虑到环境老化因素,如光和湿度。本文旨在对近十年来有关圆珠笔墨水表征和年代测定的研究进行全面系统的综述。有几种方法,破坏性和非破坏性,能够表征和区分蓝色和黑色圆珠笔,已显示出适用于静态方法。关于动态测年方法,大多数研究量化了2-苯氧乙醇(2-PE)溶剂随时间的损失
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信