{"title":"Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Menggunakan Quizizz Pada Materi Usaha dan Energi","authors":"Nabilah Ayunda Putri, M. N. R. Jauhariyah","doi":"10.29408/KPJ.V5I1.3661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to produce a web based instrument test to assess higher order thinking skills that are feasible and to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills. This research using Research and Development (R&D) model from Borg and Gall with ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation ). Data collection techniques in this study are the validation method that done by three lecturers from the physic department of State University of Surabaya and test method that done by 29 students of class X MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta’miriyyah using Quizizz. The data that has been collected were analyzed using quantitative decriptive analysis method. The percentage of average theoritical validity in the realms of construction, language, and media is is 97.03% or in the very feasible category. The result of product trials on 29 students analyzed the level of distinguishing power, reliability, and item validity. From the analysis obtained empirical validity as many as 10 questions declared empirically feasible. The appropriate test instrument is then used to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills abilities. A viable test instrument is then used to describe the student's high-level thinking ability profile. 44.83% of students in very high categories, 13.79% with good categories, 0% with sufficient categories, and 41.38% with less categories. The ability to think high level in the competency of analyzing (C4) is lower at 67.49% compared to the evaluating competency (C5) of 80.46%.","PeriodicalId":82301,"journal":{"name":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/KPJ.V5I1.3661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this research was to produce a web based instrument test to assess higher order thinking skills that are feasible and to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills. This research using Research and Development (R&D) model from Borg and Gall with ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation ). Data collection techniques in this study are the validation method that done by three lecturers from the physic department of State University of Surabaya and test method that done by 29 students of class X MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta’miriyyah using Quizizz. The data that has been collected were analyzed using quantitative decriptive analysis method. The percentage of average theoritical validity in the realms of construction, language, and media is is 97.03% or in the very feasible category. The result of product trials on 29 students analyzed the level of distinguishing power, reliability, and item validity. From the analysis obtained empirical validity as many as 10 questions declared empirically feasible. The appropriate test instrument is then used to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills abilities. A viable test instrument is then used to describe the student's high-level thinking ability profile. 44.83% of students in very high categories, 13.79% with good categories, 0% with sufficient categories, and 41.38% with less categories. The ability to think high level in the competency of analyzing (C4) is lower at 67.49% compared to the evaluating competency (C5) of 80.46%.
本研究的目的是制作一个基于网络的工具测试来评估可行的高阶思维技能,并描述学生的高阶思维技能概况。本研究采用Borg and Gall的研发(R&D)模型和ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施和评估)。本研究的数据收集技术是由泗水州立大学物理系的三位讲师进行的验证方法和由29名X级MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta 'miriyyah学生使用Quizizz进行的测试方法。采用定量描述分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。建构、语言、媒介领域的平均理论效度为97.03%,处于非常可行的范畴。对29名学生的产品试验结果进行了区分力、信度和项目效度的分析。从分析中获得的经验效度多达10个问题宣称经验可行。然后,使用适当的测试工具来描述学生的高阶思维能力。然后使用一个可行的测试工具来描述学生的高级思维能力概况。非常高类别占44.83%,好类别占13.79%,足类别占0%,少类别占41.38%。分析能力(C4)中的高水平思考能力为67.49%,低于评价能力(C5)的80.46%。