Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Menggunakan Quizizz Pada Materi Usaha dan Energi

Nabilah Ayunda Putri, M. N. R. Jauhariyah
{"title":"Penilaian Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Menggunakan Quizizz Pada Materi Usaha dan Energi","authors":"Nabilah Ayunda Putri, M. N. R. Jauhariyah","doi":"10.29408/KPJ.V5I1.3661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research was to produce a web based instrument test to assess higher order thinking skills that are feasible and to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills. This research using Research and Development (R&D) model from Borg and Gall with ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation ). Data collection techniques in this study are the validation method that done by three lecturers from the physic department of State University of Surabaya and test method that done by 29 students of class X MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta’miriyyah using Quizizz. The data that has been collected were analyzed using quantitative decriptive analysis method. The percentage of average theoritical validity in the realms of construction, language, and media is is 97.03% or in the very feasible category. The result of product trials on 29 students analyzed the level of distinguishing power, reliability, and item validity. From the analysis obtained empirical validity as many as 10 questions declared empirically feasible. The appropriate test instrument is then used to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills abilities. A viable test instrument is then used to describe the student's high-level thinking ability profile. 44.83% of students in very high categories, 13.79% with good categories, 0% with sufficient categories, and 41.38% with less categories. The ability to think high level in the competency of analyzing (C4) is lower at 67.49% compared to the evaluating competency (C5) of 80.46%.","PeriodicalId":82301,"journal":{"name":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phi Kappa Phi journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/KPJ.V5I1.3661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research was to produce a web based instrument test to assess higher order thinking skills that are feasible and to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills. This research using Research and Development (R&D) model from Borg and Gall with ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation ). Data collection techniques in this study are the validation method that done by three lecturers from the physic department of State University of Surabaya and test method that done by 29 students of class X MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta’miriyyah using Quizizz. The data that has been collected were analyzed using quantitative decriptive analysis method. The percentage of average theoritical validity in the realms of construction, language, and media is is 97.03% or in the very feasible category. The result of product trials on 29 students analyzed the level of distinguishing power, reliability, and item validity. From the analysis obtained empirical validity as many as 10 questions declared empirically feasible. The appropriate test instrument is then used to describe the profile of students higher order thinking skills abilities. A viable test instrument is then used to describe the student's high-level thinking ability profile. 44.83% of students in very high categories, 13.79% with good categories, 0% with sufficient categories, and 41.38% with less categories. The ability to think high level in the competency of analyzing (C4) is lower at 67.49% compared to the evaluating competency (C5) of 80.46%.
更高层次的思维技能评估使用测试材料上的尝试和能量
本研究的目的是制作一个基于网络的工具测试来评估可行的高阶思维技能,并描述学生的高阶思维技能概况。本研究采用Borg and Gall的研发(R&D)模型和ADDIE(分析、设计、开发、实施和评估)。本研究的数据收集技术是由泗水州立大学物理系的三位讲师进行的验证方法和由29名X级MIPA-2 SMA At-Ta 'miriyyah学生使用Quizizz进行的测试方法。采用定量描述分析法对收集到的数据进行分析。建构、语言、媒介领域的平均理论效度为97.03%,处于非常可行的范畴。对29名学生的产品试验结果进行了区分力、信度和项目效度的分析。从分析中获得的经验效度多达10个问题宣称经验可行。然后,使用适当的测试工具来描述学生的高阶思维能力。然后使用一个可行的测试工具来描述学生的高级思维能力概况。非常高类别占44.83%,好类别占13.79%,足类别占0%,少类别占41.38%。分析能力(C4)中的高水平思考能力为67.49%,低于评价能力(C5)的80.46%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信