{"title":"The Effects of Hamstrings’ Cooling and Cryostretching on Sit and Reach Flexibility Test Performance in Healthy Young Adults","authors":"Panagiotis Gkrilias, E. Tsepis, K. Fousekis","doi":"10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: To investigate the effect of hamstrings’ cooling and short-duration Cryostretching on sit and reach flexibility test (SR) performance. Study Design: Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Physical Therapy, Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Western Greece, Aigio Achaias, Greece, 3 months. Methodology: Eighteen (18) healthy male (age: 21,3±4,5 yr, weight: 79,0±12,7 Kg, body fat: 14,6± 4,0%) participated in the present study. Subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups which received in a random and counterbalanced order: a) hamstrings’ cooling with cold packs for 15 minutes, b) hamstrings’ cooling and static stretching for 14 minutes and 1 minute (30’’ for each extremity), respectively and c) passive rest (control status) for 15 minutes, on three visits made. Sit and Reach (SR) test, was applied before and after each intervention to assess the hamstrings’ flexibility. Original Research Article Gkrilias et al.; BJMMR, 19(6): xxx-xxx, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.31034 2 Results: Baseline Sit-and Reach results (SR 1) did not differ significantly between all 3 conditions (Cooling vs Control: 13,6±5,8 cm vs 13,8±7,1 cm P = 0,817; Cryostretching vs Control: 13,4±6,3 cm vs 13,8±7,1 cm P=0,620; Cooling vs Cryostretching: 13,6±5,8 vs 13,4±6,3 cm P=0,817). A significant improvement of hamstrings’ flexibility in SR2, was observed after hamstrings’ cooling intervention compared to corresponding values of Control (14,5±6,1 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm P=0,026) and after cryostretching intervention compared to corresponding values of Control (14,9 ± 6,6 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm, P=0,011). Flexibility values of hamstrings’ cooling alone compared with those after hamstrings’ cooling associated with a short bout of cryostretching (in SR 2), did not differ significantly (14,5±6,1 cm vs 14,9±6,6 cm, P= 0,502). Conclusion: Hamstrings’ cooling and cryostretching can improve performance in SR test and thus can be used as alternative methods for increasing the hamstrings’ flexibility in short term.","PeriodicalId":9249,"journal":{"name":"British journal of medicine and medical research","volume":"124 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of medicine and medical research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/BJMMR/2017/31034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Aims: To investigate the effect of hamstrings’ cooling and short-duration Cryostretching on sit and reach flexibility test (SR) performance. Study Design: Crossover Randomized Clinical Trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Physical Therapy, Technological Educational Institute (TEI) of Western Greece, Aigio Achaias, Greece, 3 months. Methodology: Eighteen (18) healthy male (age: 21,3±4,5 yr, weight: 79,0±12,7 Kg, body fat: 14,6± 4,0%) participated in the present study. Subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups which received in a random and counterbalanced order: a) hamstrings’ cooling with cold packs for 15 minutes, b) hamstrings’ cooling and static stretching for 14 minutes and 1 minute (30’’ for each extremity), respectively and c) passive rest (control status) for 15 minutes, on three visits made. Sit and Reach (SR) test, was applied before and after each intervention to assess the hamstrings’ flexibility. Original Research Article Gkrilias et al.; BJMMR, 19(6): xxx-xxx, 2017; Article no.BJMMR.31034 2 Results: Baseline Sit-and Reach results (SR 1) did not differ significantly between all 3 conditions (Cooling vs Control: 13,6±5,8 cm vs 13,8±7,1 cm P = 0,817; Cryostretching vs Control: 13,4±6,3 cm vs 13,8±7,1 cm P=0,620; Cooling vs Cryostretching: 13,6±5,8 vs 13,4±6,3 cm P=0,817). A significant improvement of hamstrings’ flexibility in SR2, was observed after hamstrings’ cooling intervention compared to corresponding values of Control (14,5±6,1 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm P=0,026) and after cryostretching intervention compared to corresponding values of Control (14,9 ± 6,6 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm, P=0,011). Flexibility values of hamstrings’ cooling alone compared with those after hamstrings’ cooling associated with a short bout of cryostretching (in SR 2), did not differ significantly (14,5±6,1 cm vs 14,9±6,6 cm, P= 0,502). Conclusion: Hamstrings’ cooling and cryostretching can improve performance in SR test and thus can be used as alternative methods for increasing the hamstrings’ flexibility in short term.
目的:探讨腘绳肌冷却和短时间低温拉伸对坐位柔韧性测试(SR)成绩的影响。研究设计:交叉随机临床试验。研究地点和时间:希腊Aigio achaas,西希腊技术教育学院(TEI)物理治疗系,为期3个月。方法:18(18)名健康男性(年龄:21,3±4,5岁,体重:79,0±12,7 Kg,体脂:14.6±4,0%)参与本研究。受试者被随机分为3组,按照随机和平衡的顺序接受:a)用冷敷袋冷却腿筋15分钟,b)腿筋冷却和静态拉伸分别为14分钟和1分钟(每条四肢30英寸),c)被动休息15分钟(对照状态),共进行3次访问。在每次干预前和干预后分别进行坐伸(SR)测试,以评估腘绳肌的柔韧性。Gkrilias et al.;生物医学工程学报,19(6):xxx-xxx, 2017;文章no.BJMMR。31034 2结果:基线坐姿和伸展结果(SR 1)在所有3种情况下没有显着差异(冷却与控制:13,6±5,8 cm vs 13,8±7,1 cm P = 0,817;低温拉伸vs对照组:13.4±6.3 cm vs 13.8±7.1 cm P=0,620;冷却vs冷冻拉伸:13.6±5,8 vs 13.4±6,3 cm P=0,817)。与对照组的相应值(14,5±6,1 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm P=0,026)和冷冻拉伸干预后的SR2腘绳肌柔韧性与对照组的相应值(14,9±6,6 cm vs 13,2±7,0 cm, P=0,011)相比均有显著改善。单独冷却腘绳肌的柔韧性值与短时间冷冻拉伸后腘绳肌冷却的柔韧性值(SR 2)无显著差异(14,5±6,1 cm vs 14,9±6,6 cm, P= 0,502)。结论:腘绳肌冷却和冷冻拉伸可提高SR试验的表现,可作为短期内增加腘绳肌柔韧性的替代方法。