“Prorubono, vytjagono”. The Philosophy of the Voice in Vladimir Sorokin’s The Factory Committee Meeting

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
M. Ghilarducci
{"title":"“Prorubono, vytjagono”. The Philosophy of the Voice in Vladimir Sorokin’s The Factory Committee Meeting","authors":"M. Ghilarducci","doi":"10.36253/studi_slavis-10007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates the poetics of language in Vladimir Sorokin’s The Factory Committee Meeting from a new point of view. This tale, which dates to the author’s early short prose (1979-1984), has been unanimously regarded as one of the many examples of literary soc–art. Accordingly, the deformed words pronounced in the main event of the text – a collective ritual of violence – have been considered as a device to deconstruct official Soviet ideological discourse (novojaz). However, the neologisms pronounced by the characters (prorubono, vytjagono and others) are not linked to novojaz. Rather, they are arcane words with a strong performative character, which is, paradoxically, linked to the fact that they apparently do not mean anything. In my investigation, I consider these neologisms as a device to deconstruct language as such. Following Mladen Dolar’s philosophy of the voice and Giorgio Agamben’s consideration on the role voice and bare life play in human existence, I regard the deformed words in The Factory Committee Meeting as the literary representation of a point of transition from pure voice / sound (phonē) as the expression of bare life (zōḗ) to the articulated language (logos) which socio-political life (bíos) is based on. I call this liminal stage extimacy (Dolar) and ‘zone of indistinguishability’ (Agamben): a movement of exclusion and, at the same time, inclusion of pure voice and bare life in the logos of the socio-political community.","PeriodicalId":41566,"journal":{"name":"Studi Slavistici","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi Slavistici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/studi_slavis-10007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article investigates the poetics of language in Vladimir Sorokin’s The Factory Committee Meeting from a new point of view. This tale, which dates to the author’s early short prose (1979-1984), has been unanimously regarded as one of the many examples of literary soc–art. Accordingly, the deformed words pronounced in the main event of the text – a collective ritual of violence – have been considered as a device to deconstruct official Soviet ideological discourse (novojaz). However, the neologisms pronounced by the characters (prorubono, vytjagono and others) are not linked to novojaz. Rather, they are arcane words with a strong performative character, which is, paradoxically, linked to the fact that they apparently do not mean anything. In my investigation, I consider these neologisms as a device to deconstruct language as such. Following Mladen Dolar’s philosophy of the voice and Giorgio Agamben’s consideration on the role voice and bare life play in human existence, I regard the deformed words in The Factory Committee Meeting as the literary representation of a point of transition from pure voice / sound (phonē) as the expression of bare life (zōḗ) to the articulated language (logos) which socio-political life (bíos) is based on. I call this liminal stage extimacy (Dolar) and ‘zone of indistinguishability’ (Agamben): a movement of exclusion and, at the same time, inclusion of pure voice and bare life in the logos of the socio-political community.
“Prorubono vytjagono”。索罗金《工厂委员会会议》中声音的哲学
本文从一个新的角度来考察索罗金的《工厂委员会会议》中的语言诗学。这个故事可以追溯到作者早期的短篇散文(1979-1984),被一致认为是文学社会艺术的众多例子之一。因此,在文本的主要事件中——一种集体的暴力仪式——被视为解构苏联官方意识形态话语(novojaz)的一种手段。然而,汉字发音的新词(proubono, vytjagono等)与novojaz没有联系。相反,它们是带有强烈表演特征的晦涩词汇,而矛盾的是,这与它们显然没有任何意义的事实有关。在我的研究中,我认为这些新词是解构语言本身的一种手段。根据姆拉丹·多尔的声音哲学和乔治·阿甘本对声音和赤裸生命在人类存在中所扮演角色的思考,我认为《工厂委员会会议》中变形的文字是一种从纯粹的声音/声音(phoni)作为赤裸生命的表达(zōḗ)到社会政治生活(bíos)所基于的清晰语言(logos)的过渡点的文学表现。我把这种极限阶段(Dolar)和“不可区分区”(Agamben)称为:一种排斥运动,同时,在社会政治共同体的标志中包含了纯粹的声音和赤裸的生活。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studi Slavistici
Studi Slavistici HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信