Toward an Engineering Faculty Development Initiative for Associate Professors: Results from Focus Groups at an R1 Institution

Catherine G. P. Berdanier
{"title":"Toward an Engineering Faculty Development Initiative for Associate Professors: Results from Focus Groups at an R1 Institution","authors":"Catherine G. P. Berdanier","doi":"10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this full research paper is to explore faculty perceptions on how departments and colleges can continue to support faculty through the associate professor level. Little research exists that discusses best practices or even possible formats for mentoring and faculty development programs at the associate professor level. This study begins to fill this gap for one institutional type, eliciting suggestions from faculty on desired characteristics and attributes of a mid-career (associate) faculty development program. To elicit feedback, five focus groups of between 5-9 tenured or tenure-track mechanical engineering faculty each were conducted to elicit information on what faculty at various levels knew about career development post tenure, and what their ideas of an “ideal” mid-career faculty development initiative would look like. Audio recordings and jottings were collected as data and analyzed through constant comparative methods and content analysis methods, using landscapes of practice theory to highlight areas where faculty noted the need for explicit professional development. Results indicate that perceptions on career advancement post-tenure differed between faculty at different levels, and indicate several potential structures, characteristics, and attributes that a successful potential midcareer faculty development model might have.","PeriodicalId":6700,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE43999.2019.9028709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this full research paper is to explore faculty perceptions on how departments and colleges can continue to support faculty through the associate professor level. Little research exists that discusses best practices or even possible formats for mentoring and faculty development programs at the associate professor level. This study begins to fill this gap for one institutional type, eliciting suggestions from faculty on desired characteristics and attributes of a mid-career (associate) faculty development program. To elicit feedback, five focus groups of between 5-9 tenured or tenure-track mechanical engineering faculty each were conducted to elicit information on what faculty at various levels knew about career development post tenure, and what their ideas of an “ideal” mid-career faculty development initiative would look like. Audio recordings and jottings were collected as data and analyzed through constant comparative methods and content analysis methods, using landscapes of practice theory to highlight areas where faculty noted the need for explicit professional development. Results indicate that perceptions on career advancement post-tenure differed between faculty at different levels, and indicate several potential structures, characteristics, and attributes that a successful potential midcareer faculty development model might have.
面向副教授的工程学院发展倡议:来自R1机构焦点小组的结果
这篇完整的研究论文的目的是探讨教师对院系和学院如何通过副教授水平继续支持教师的看法。很少有研究讨论副教授级别的指导和教师发展项目的最佳实践,甚至可能的形式。本研究开始填补一种机构类型的这一空白,从教师那里得到关于职业中期(助理)教师发展计划的期望特征和属性的建议。为了获得反馈,五个焦点小组分别由5-9名终身教职或终身教职的机械工程学院的教师组成,以获取不同层次的教师对终身教职后职业发展的了解,以及他们对职业中期教师发展计划的“理想”看法。录音和笔记被收集为数据,并通过不断的比较方法和内容分析方法进行分析,使用实践理论的景观来突出教师指出需要明确专业发展的领域。结果表明,不同层次的教师对终身教职后职业发展的看法存在差异,并指出了一个成功的潜在职业中期教师发展模式可能具有的几种潜在结构、特征和属性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信