Measuring User Experience of Blended Learning Application: A Case Study of Higher Education

Q3 Social Sciences
Rabiah Eladwiah Abdul Rahim, Jivindra Kalaichelven, Roslina Ibrahim
{"title":"Measuring User Experience of Blended Learning Application: A Case Study of Higher Education","authors":"Rabiah Eladwiah Abdul Rahim, Jivindra Kalaichelven, Roslina Ibrahim","doi":"10.1145/3514262.3514284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blended Learning (BL) has been widely adopted in higher education. This innovative delivery method is crucial to improve students’ engagement including at postgraduate level. This research examines User Experience (UX) of postgraduate blended learning module at a Malaysian private university. The six dimensions of User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) which are attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty were used as the framework to evaluate UX of this application. An interdisciplinary Research Methodology course was selected to examine UX of BL module at postgraduate level. A total of 110 students participated in this study. The data was analysed based on mean, variance, and confidence interval. This study found that the pragmatic quality (efficiency, perspicuity, dependability) scores higher than hedonic quality (stimulation, novelty). This study however is limited to only one selected blended learning module. Future studies may examine other postgraduate courses using different UX framework and adding qualitative approach to understand further of UX of postgraduate blended learning module.","PeriodicalId":37324,"journal":{"name":"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3514262.3514284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blended Learning (BL) has been widely adopted in higher education. This innovative delivery method is crucial to improve students’ engagement including at postgraduate level. This research examines User Experience (UX) of postgraduate blended learning module at a Malaysian private university. The six dimensions of User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ) which are attractiveness, perspicuity, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty were used as the framework to evaluate UX of this application. An interdisciplinary Research Methodology course was selected to examine UX of BL module at postgraduate level. A total of 110 students participated in this study. The data was analysed based on mean, variance, and confidence interval. This study found that the pragmatic quality (efficiency, perspicuity, dependability) scores higher than hedonic quality (stimulation, novelty). This study however is limited to only one selected blended learning module. Future studies may examine other postgraduate courses using different UX framework and adding qualitative approach to understand further of UX of postgraduate blended learning module.
衡量混合学习应用的用户体验:以高等教育为例
混合学习在高等教育中得到了广泛的应用。这种创新的交付方法对于提高学生的参与度至关重要,包括在研究生阶段。本研究考察了马来西亚一所私立大学研究生混合式学习模块的用户体验。以用户体验问卷(UEQ)的吸引力、清晰性、效率、可靠性、刺激性和新颖性六个维度作为评价该应用的用户体验的框架。选择跨学科的研究方法论课程,在研究生阶段检验BL模块的用户体验。共有110名学生参与了这项研究。根据平均值、方差和置信区间对数据进行分析。本研究发现,语用品质(效率、清晰、可靠)得分高于享乐品质(刺激、新奇)。然而,本研究仅限于一个选定的混合学习模块。未来的研究可以考察其他研究生课程,使用不同的用户体验框架,并增加定性的方法来进一步了解研究生混合学习模块的用户体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信