Effects of different vegetation restoration types on soil infiltration characteristics in severely eroded subtropical regions of South China

IF 2.2 4区 农林科学 Q2 ECOLOGY
J. Peng, X. Xu, Haifang Wen, S. Ni, J. Wang, C. Cai
{"title":"Effects of different vegetation restoration types on soil infiltration characteristics in severely eroded subtropical regions of South China","authors":"J. Peng, X. Xu, Haifang Wen, S. Ni, J. Wang, C. Cai","doi":"10.2489/jswc.2023.00047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vegetation restoration could cause variations in soil and near-surface properties, altering soil structure directly or indirectly and consequently affecting soil infiltration characteristics. This study is aimed at exploring the variation of soil physicochemical properties and infiltration characteristics under five vegetation restoration types (including restored forest, restored orchard, restored scrubland, restored grassland, and unrestored eroded land, which are referred to as RF, RO, RS, RG, and EL, respectively) and the main factors affecting infiltration characteristics. The EL was taken as the control group. Five hydraulic heads (0, −3, −6, −9, and −12 cm) were set to continuously measure the soil infiltration characteristics through a disc infiltrometer. Results indicated that vegetation restoration types significantly affected initial infiltration rate (IIR), steady infiltration rate (SIR), and hydraulic conductivity (Ks), which ranged from 0.56 to 4.40, 0.32 to 2.86, and 6.48 × 10−3 to 0.47 mm h−1, respectively (mean value: 2.72, 1.35, and 0.32 mm h−1, respectively). The highest value of soil infiltration rate appeared in the EL, and the lowest value was observed in the RF. Root parameters including root length density and root surface density were highest in RG, and lowest in the control and RF, respectively. In addition, the conceptual path model explained 95%, 96%, and 96% of the variance in IIR, SIR, and Ks, with the goodness-of-fit index of 0.988, 0.988, and 0.997, respectively. This modeling determined biological crust thickness, soil organic matter content, root length density, and sand content as the major factors affecting the process of soil infiltration. These results enhance our understanding of the water erosion process under different vegetation restoration types in the severely eroded subtropical regions of South China.","PeriodicalId":50049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil and Water Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.2023.00047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Vegetation restoration could cause variations in soil and near-surface properties, altering soil structure directly or indirectly and consequently affecting soil infiltration characteristics. This study is aimed at exploring the variation of soil physicochemical properties and infiltration characteristics under five vegetation restoration types (including restored forest, restored orchard, restored scrubland, restored grassland, and unrestored eroded land, which are referred to as RF, RO, RS, RG, and EL, respectively) and the main factors affecting infiltration characteristics. The EL was taken as the control group. Five hydraulic heads (0, −3, −6, −9, and −12 cm) were set to continuously measure the soil infiltration characteristics through a disc infiltrometer. Results indicated that vegetation restoration types significantly affected initial infiltration rate (IIR), steady infiltration rate (SIR), and hydraulic conductivity (Ks), which ranged from 0.56 to 4.40, 0.32 to 2.86, and 6.48 × 10−3 to 0.47 mm h−1, respectively (mean value: 2.72, 1.35, and 0.32 mm h−1, respectively). The highest value of soil infiltration rate appeared in the EL, and the lowest value was observed in the RF. Root parameters including root length density and root surface density were highest in RG, and lowest in the control and RF, respectively. In addition, the conceptual path model explained 95%, 96%, and 96% of the variance in IIR, SIR, and Ks, with the goodness-of-fit index of 0.988, 0.988, and 0.997, respectively. This modeling determined biological crust thickness, soil organic matter content, root length density, and sand content as the major factors affecting the process of soil infiltration. These results enhance our understanding of the water erosion process under different vegetation restoration types in the severely eroded subtropical regions of South China.
华南亚热带严重侵蚀区不同植被恢复类型对土壤入渗特征的影响
植被恢复会引起土壤和近地表性质的变化,直接或间接地改变土壤结构,从而影响土壤入渗特性。本研究旨在探讨五种植被恢复类型(恢复森林、恢复果园、恢复灌丛、恢复草地和未恢复侵蚀地,分别称为RF、RO、RS、RG和EL)下土壤理化性质和入渗特征的变化,以及影响入渗特征的主要因素。以EL组为对照组。设置五个液压头(0,- 3,- 6,- 9和- 12厘米),通过圆盘渗透计连续测量土壤渗透特性。结果表明,植被恢复类型对初始入渗速率(IIR)、稳定入渗速率(SIR)和水导率(Ks)影响显著,分别为0.56 ~ 4.40、0.32 ~ 2.86和6.48 × 10−3 ~ 0.47 mm h−1(平均值分别为2.72、1.35和0.32 mm h−1)。土壤入渗速率最大值出现在东部,最小值出现在中部。根长密度和根表面密度以RG组最高,对照和RF组最低。此外,概念路径模型解释了95%、96%和96%的IIR、SIR和Ks方差,拟合优度指数分别为0.988、0.988和0.997。该模型确定了生物结皮厚度、土壤有机质含量、根长密度和含沙量是影响土壤入渗过程的主要因素。这些结果加深了我们对华南亚热带严重侵蚀地区不同植被恢复类型下水分侵蚀过程的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (JSWC) is a multidisciplinary journal of natural resource conservation research, practice, policy, and perspectives. The journal has two sections: the A Section containing various departments and features, and the Research Section containing peer-reviewed research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信