Metaphorical Truth and Neopragmatic Realism of Hilary Putnam

P. A. Ilyin
{"title":"Metaphorical Truth and Neopragmatic Realism of Hilary Putnam","authors":"P. A. Ilyin","doi":"10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-1-29-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The problems of reference, truth, and realism are extremely important for contemporary philosophical discourse. Interesting interpretations of these problems have been given by such thinkers as Paul Ricoeur and Hilary Putnam. Instead of being originally representatives of different philosophical traditions, Ricoeur and Putnam came to similar conclusions on a number of the above issues, which allows us to speak of the possible prospect of a fruitful philosophical synthesis of the two authors' positions. The aim of this paper is to justify the theoretical possibility of such a synthesis, namely to show how the different elements of Putnam's theory can be improved by using Ricoeur's approach, which is outlined in his concept of metaphorical truth. Despite the obvious proximity of the two authors, there are currently no works where Ricoeur's conception of metaphorical truth was compared with Putnam's philosophy.Methodology and sources. To meet this challenge, we have resorted to an examination of the author's primary sources, which reveal the methodology of both philosophers. Special relevance of the article is connected with the unusual perspective of considering the problems that are important for the philosophy of late 20th-early 21st century. These are problems that related to the comprehension of our thinking, the role of language in creating a picture of the world and the resulting possibility of building a special kind of ontology.Results and discussion. The study revealed many overlaps in the authors' consideration of the concept of truth, the problem of realism, and the theory of reference, as well as in the way that both philosophers define the relationship between language and reality. The most similarities were found in the relationship between Ricoeur's concept of metaphorical truth and Putnam's philosophy of inner realism.Conclusion. Thus, we can conclude that the philosophical approaches of both thinkers share a great deal of intuition about the direction in which research of truth and referential theory and the problem of realism that is one of the most fundamental problems of philosophy throughout its history can be developed.","PeriodicalId":75784,"journal":{"name":"Dental Discourse","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2023-9-1-29-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The problems of reference, truth, and realism are extremely important for contemporary philosophical discourse. Interesting interpretations of these problems have been given by such thinkers as Paul Ricoeur and Hilary Putnam. Instead of being originally representatives of different philosophical traditions, Ricoeur and Putnam came to similar conclusions on a number of the above issues, which allows us to speak of the possible prospect of a fruitful philosophical synthesis of the two authors' positions. The aim of this paper is to justify the theoretical possibility of such a synthesis, namely to show how the different elements of Putnam's theory can be improved by using Ricoeur's approach, which is outlined in his concept of metaphorical truth. Despite the obvious proximity of the two authors, there are currently no works where Ricoeur's conception of metaphorical truth was compared with Putnam's philosophy.Methodology and sources. To meet this challenge, we have resorted to an examination of the author's primary sources, which reveal the methodology of both philosophers. Special relevance of the article is connected with the unusual perspective of considering the problems that are important for the philosophy of late 20th-early 21st century. These are problems that related to the comprehension of our thinking, the role of language in creating a picture of the world and the resulting possibility of building a special kind of ontology.Results and discussion. The study revealed many overlaps in the authors' consideration of the concept of truth, the problem of realism, and the theory of reference, as well as in the way that both philosophers define the relationship between language and reality. The most similarities were found in the relationship between Ricoeur's concept of metaphorical truth and Putnam's philosophy of inner realism.Conclusion. Thus, we can conclude that the philosophical approaches of both thinkers share a great deal of intuition about the direction in which research of truth and referential theory and the problem of realism that is one of the most fundamental problems of philosophy throughout its history can be developed.
隐喻真理与希拉里·普特南的新语用现实主义
介绍。指称、真理和实在论问题是当代哲学话语中极其重要的问题。Paul Ricoeur和Hilary Putnam等思想家对这些问题给出了有趣的解释。Ricoeur和Putnam原本并不是不同哲学传统的代表,而是在上述许多问题上得出了类似的结论,这使我们能够谈论对两位作者的立场进行富有成效的哲学综合的可能前景。本文的目的是证明这种综合的理论可能性,即展示如何通过使用利科尔的方法来改进普特南理论的不同要素,利科尔的方法概述在他的隐喻真理概念中。尽管两位作者有明显的相似之处,但目前还没有作品将利科尔的隐喻真理概念与普特南的哲学进行比较。方法和来源。为了迎接这一挑战,我们对作者的主要资料进行了考察,这些资料揭示了两位哲学家的方法论。这篇文章的特殊相关性与考虑20世纪末至21世纪初哲学重要问题的不同寻常的视角有关。这些问题与我们对思维的理解、语言在创造世界图景中的作用以及由此产生的构建一种特殊的本体论的可能性有关。结果和讨论。这项研究揭示了两位作者在思考真理概念、现实主义问题和指称理论方面的许多重叠之处,以及两位哲学家定义语言与现实之间关系的方式。利科尔的隐喻真理概念与帕特南的内在实在主义哲学的关系最为相似。因此,我们可以得出结论,两位思想家的哲学方法在真理和参照理论的研究方向上有着大量的直觉,而现实主义问题是哲学历史上最基本的问题之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信