Does Inequality in Landownership Contribute To Inequality in Education Attainment? Empirical Evidence From Kenya

J. Gathiaka
{"title":"Does Inequality in Landownership Contribute To Inequality in Education Attainment? Empirical Evidence From Kenya","authors":"J. Gathiaka","doi":"10.56279/ter.v12i2.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An inverse relationship is found across countries between unequal landownership and education attainment. Since Kenya exhibits inequalities in landownership and education attainment across and within counties, households and gender, is there any relationship between the observed inequalities? Using data from the Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey and the Kenya Population and Housing Census, the study applies fractional IV and IV-Two Stage Least Squares (2SLS) regression methods to examine whether the Gini of landownership influences the Gini of education attainment across counties, and the determinants of education attainment in Kenya. The evidence generated does not support the strong relationship between landownership inequality and inequality in education previously documented. Government financing of free education, coupled with bursaries, muffle the relationship. Inequality in education attainment across counties is likely due to county disparities in household size, income, urbanization rate, and participation in highlevel public employment. An increase in average per capita household expenditure, or urban population, also reduce the probability of inequality in primary as well as secondary education attainment in a county. Government financing of education and policies that promote urbanization, enhance quality of families, and increase highlevel participation in government reduce any effect that landownership inequality could have on education attainment. \nJEL Classification: I24; C21; C26; D13; Q15; R20.","PeriodicalId":91807,"journal":{"name":"Tanzanian economic review","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzanian economic review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56279/ter.v12i2.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An inverse relationship is found across countries between unequal landownership and education attainment. Since Kenya exhibits inequalities in landownership and education attainment across and within counties, households and gender, is there any relationship between the observed inequalities? Using data from the Kenya Integrated Household Budget Survey and the Kenya Population and Housing Census, the study applies fractional IV and IV-Two Stage Least Squares (2SLS) regression methods to examine whether the Gini of landownership influences the Gini of education attainment across counties, and the determinants of education attainment in Kenya. The evidence generated does not support the strong relationship between landownership inequality and inequality in education previously documented. Government financing of free education, coupled with bursaries, muffle the relationship. Inequality in education attainment across counties is likely due to county disparities in household size, income, urbanization rate, and participation in highlevel public employment. An increase in average per capita household expenditure, or urban population, also reduce the probability of inequality in primary as well as secondary education attainment in a county. Government financing of education and policies that promote urbanization, enhance quality of families, and increase highlevel participation in government reduce any effect that landownership inequality could have on education attainment. JEL Classification: I24; C21; C26; D13; Q15; R20.
土地所有权的不平等是否导致了教育程度的不平等?来自肯尼亚的经验证据
在各个国家,不平等的土地所有权和受教育程度之间呈反比关系。既然肯尼亚在土地所有权和教育程度上表现出县与县之间、家庭内部和性别之间的不平等,那么观察到的不平等之间是否存在任何关系?利用肯尼亚综合家庭预算调查和肯尼亚人口与住房普查的数据,本研究采用分数IV和IV-两阶段最小二乘(2SLS)回归方法来检验土地所有权的基尼系数是否影响各县受教育程度的基尼系数,以及肯尼亚受教育程度的决定因素。所产生的证据并不支持以前文献记载的土地所有权不平等与教育不平等之间的强烈关系。政府资助的免费教育,加上助学金,使这种关系变得模糊。各县之间受教育程度的不平等可能是由于各县在家庭规模、收入、城市化率和参与高级公共就业方面的差异。人均家庭支出或城市人口的增加,也会降低一个县初等和中等教育程度不平等的可能性。政府对教育的资助以及促进城市化、提高家庭质量和增加高层参与政府的政策,减少了土地所有权不平等可能对教育成就产生的任何影响。JEL分类:I24;C21;C26;D13;最喜欢;R20。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信