Infrastructure investment and employment: Evidence for Portugal

IF 1 Q4 MANAGEMENT
A. Pereira, R. Pereira, Pedro G. Rodrigues
{"title":"Infrastructure investment and employment: Evidence for Portugal","authors":"A. Pereira, R. Pereira, Pedro G. Rodrigues","doi":"10.24294/jipd.v5i2.1377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We estimated how investment in 12 infrastructure types affects employment in Portugal. Using a vector-autoregressive specification at the industry level, we found a double dividend associated with ports and airports: investing in either delivers the greatest bang per euro, both on impact and in the long run. One million euros invested in ports and airports creates 717.1 and 290.5 jobs in the long run, respectively, and 535 and 253.3 jobs in the short run, respectively. Regarding long-term employment effects, these are followed by municipal roads, telecommunications, national roads, health structures, education facilities, refineries, railroads, and highways. Water infrastructures and electricity and gas infrastructures have negligible effects. With the long-term effects decomposed, sizable supply-side employment effects for health and education facilities exist, while demand-side effects dominate for airports, ports, municipal roads, and telecommunications. Employment following the investment in national roads is balanced across demand and supply channels. We found no significant employment-related location effects of infrastructure investments. Also, investing in either health facilities or in education buildings entails non-negligible job losses in the short run. These results suggest that the magnitude and the timing of job creation crucially depend on the type of infrastructure investment. Policymakers in Portugal need to be aware of this in choosing between countercyclical or structural targets.","PeriodicalId":41907,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development","volume":"79 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v5i2.1377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We estimated how investment in 12 infrastructure types affects employment in Portugal. Using a vector-autoregressive specification at the industry level, we found a double dividend associated with ports and airports: investing in either delivers the greatest bang per euro, both on impact and in the long run. One million euros invested in ports and airports creates 717.1 and 290.5 jobs in the long run, respectively, and 535 and 253.3 jobs in the short run, respectively. Regarding long-term employment effects, these are followed by municipal roads, telecommunications, national roads, health structures, education facilities, refineries, railroads, and highways. Water infrastructures and electricity and gas infrastructures have negligible effects. With the long-term effects decomposed, sizable supply-side employment effects for health and education facilities exist, while demand-side effects dominate for airports, ports, municipal roads, and telecommunications. Employment following the investment in national roads is balanced across demand and supply channels. We found no significant employment-related location effects of infrastructure investments. Also, investing in either health facilities or in education buildings entails non-negligible job losses in the short run. These results suggest that the magnitude and the timing of job creation crucially depend on the type of infrastructure investment. Policymakers in Portugal need to be aware of this in choosing between countercyclical or structural targets.
基础设施投资和就业:以葡萄牙为例
我们估计了12种基础设施类型的投资如何影响葡萄牙的就业。在行业层面使用向量自回归规范,我们发现与港口和机场相关的双重红利:无论是在影响上还是从长期来看,投资于任何一个都能带来每欧元最大的收益。在港口和机场投资100万欧元,从长期来看,将分别创造717.1个和290.5个工作岗位,从短期来看,将分别创造535个和253.3个工作岗位。就长期就业影响而言,紧随其后的是市政道路、电信、国道、保健结构、教育设施、精炼厂、铁路和高速公路。水基础设施、电力和天然气基础设施的影响可以忽略不计。随着长期影响的分解,对卫生和教育设施存在相当大的供给侧就业影响,而对机场、港口、市政道路和电信的需求侧影响占主导地位。投资国道后的就业在供需渠道上是平衡的。我们发现基础设施投资没有显著的就业相关区位效应。此外,投资于卫生设施或教育建筑在短期内会造成不可忽视的就业损失。这些结果表明,创造就业的规模和时机在很大程度上取决于基础设施投资的类型。葡萄牙的政策制定者在选择反周期目标还是结构性目标时,需要意识到这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信