Assessing Shear and Compressive Strength of Reclaimed Asphalt Concrete

S. Sarsam, I. Ali, Hasan AL-Janabi
{"title":"Assessing Shear and Compressive Strength of Reclaimed Asphalt Concrete","authors":"S. Sarsam, I. Ali, Hasan AL-Janabi","doi":"10.12983/IJSRK-2014-P0352-0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prime objectives for this study are evaluating the performance of recycled asphalt concrete, investigating the effect of recycling agent type and amount on mixture performance, and studying the effect of inclusion of more reclaimed materials content into recycled mixtures. For this purpose, reclaimed materials milled from field, filler, virgin asphalt cement, and four types of recycling agents (used oil, oil + crumb rubber, soft grade asphalt cement, and asphalt cement + sulfur powder), have been implemented and were used to prepare recycled mixtures with nominal maximum size of 12.5 mm. The recycling agent that showed the best mixture performance was used to prepare recycled mixtures with different reclaimed materials contents. Mixtures were subjected to Double Punch shear, Compressive Strength, and index of retained strength Test. It was found that using soft grade asphalt cement as a recycling agent revealed better performance than other types of recycling agents. For recycled mixtures with mixing ratio of (50/50) virgin/reclaimed materials, the optimum recycling agent contents were (0.56%, 1%, 1.3%, and 1.5%) by weight of mixture for (used oil, oil + crumb rubber, soft grade asphalt cement, and asphalt cement + Sulfur) recycling agent respectively. Recycled Mixtures with reclaimed materials content, up to 70 %, and soft asphalt recycling agent, showed good performance. The percentages of variation for mixtures properties compared to mixtures with 50 % reclaimed materials were +3.6 %, +4.8 % for double punch shear, and compressive strength respectively, and the reduction in mixtures properties as compared to virgin mixture was in acceptable extent.","PeriodicalId":14310,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge","volume":"12 1","pages":"352-361"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Scientific Research in Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12983/IJSRK-2014-P0352-0361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

The prime objectives for this study are evaluating the performance of recycled asphalt concrete, investigating the effect of recycling agent type and amount on mixture performance, and studying the effect of inclusion of more reclaimed materials content into recycled mixtures. For this purpose, reclaimed materials milled from field, filler, virgin asphalt cement, and four types of recycling agents (used oil, oil + crumb rubber, soft grade asphalt cement, and asphalt cement + sulfur powder), have been implemented and were used to prepare recycled mixtures with nominal maximum size of 12.5 mm. The recycling agent that showed the best mixture performance was used to prepare recycled mixtures with different reclaimed materials contents. Mixtures were subjected to Double Punch shear, Compressive Strength, and index of retained strength Test. It was found that using soft grade asphalt cement as a recycling agent revealed better performance than other types of recycling agents. For recycled mixtures with mixing ratio of (50/50) virgin/reclaimed materials, the optimum recycling agent contents were (0.56%, 1%, 1.3%, and 1.5%) by weight of mixture for (used oil, oil + crumb rubber, soft grade asphalt cement, and asphalt cement + Sulfur) recycling agent respectively. Recycled Mixtures with reclaimed materials content, up to 70 %, and soft asphalt recycling agent, showed good performance. The percentages of variation for mixtures properties compared to mixtures with 50 % reclaimed materials were +3.6 %, +4.8 % for double punch shear, and compressive strength respectively, and the reduction in mixtures properties as compared to virgin mixture was in acceptable extent.
再生沥青混凝土抗剪抗压强度评定
本研究的主要目的是评价再生沥青混凝土的性能,研究再生剂类型和用量对混合料性能的影响,以及研究在再生混合料中掺入更多再生材料的影响。为此,已经实施了从现场磨成的再生材料、填料、初榨沥青水泥和四种类型的回收剂(废油、油+橡胶屑、软级沥青水泥和沥青水泥+硫粉),并用于制备标称最大尺寸为12.5 mm的再生混合物。用性能最佳的回收剂制备了不同再生材料含量的回收混合物。对混合料进行了双冲剪、抗压强度和保留强度指标试验。研究发现,软级沥青水泥作为再生剂的性能优于其他类型的再生剂。对于原料与再生料配比为(50/50)的再生混合料,(废油、油+橡胶屑、软级沥青水泥、沥青水泥+硫)再生剂的最佳掺量分别为(0.56%、1%、1.3%、1.5%)(按重量计)。再生料掺加软沥青再生剂,再生料含量高达70%,表现出良好的性能。与含有50%再生材料的混合物相比,混合物性能的变化百分比分别为+ 3.6%,双冲剪和抗压强度的变化百分比为+ 4.8%,与原始混合物相比,混合物性能的降低处于可接受的范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信