Non-Attendance to Post-Radiotherapy Follow-Up in Breast Cancer: Efficacy of Mail and Telephone Reminders

F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen
{"title":"Non-Attendance to Post-Radiotherapy Follow-Up in Breast Cancer: Efficacy of Mail and Telephone Reminders","authors":"F. Bruns, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, C. Henkenberens, H. Christiansen","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients.\nMethods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a\nconfirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted\nof a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy\nfollow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend\nthis follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal\npossible efficacy of the telephone reminder.\nResults: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this\nrate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3%\n(11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not\nattend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after\n(exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first\ncall but not for the second call in the chi-square test.\nConclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the\npost-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the\nmail reminder system.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"106 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2020.08.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To assess the efficacy of two reminder interventions in improving post-radiotherapy followup attendance rates of breast cancer patients. Methods: Three periods of three months were assessed, a baseline period, an intervention period and a confirmation period. In the intervention period, a two-step reminder system was used. This system consisted of a mail reminder (IV1) that was sent to all patients three to four weeks prior to the post-radiotherapy follow-up visit, which was followed by up to two telephone calls (IV2) for all patients who did not attend this follow-up visit. During the confirmation period, IV2 was used exclusively to assess the maximal possible efficacy of the telephone reminder. Results: The non-attendance rate of breast cancer patients was 18.1% (19/105) in the baseline period; this rate decreased to 13.1% in the intervention period (23/176; p=0.33) after IV1 and then decreased to 6.3% (11/176; p=0.03) after IV2. In the confirmation period, 24.4% (42/172) of breast cancer patients did not attend their post-radiotherapy follow-up visit; the non-attendance rate decreased significantly after (exclusive) IV2 from 24.4% (42/172) to 9.3% (16/172; p<0.001). Significance was observed for the first call but not for the second call in the chi-square test. Conclusion: Telephone reminder is an effective tool for improving breast cancer patient adherence to the post-radiotherapy follow-up visit. In this study, the telephone reminder system was more effective than the mail reminder system.
乳腺癌放疗后不参加随访:邮件和电话提醒的效果
背景:评价两种提醒干预措施对提高乳腺癌患者放疗后随访出勤率的效果。方法:分为三个阶段,分别为基线期、干预期和确认期。在干预期间,采用两步提醒系统。该系统包括一封邮件提醒(IV1),在放疗后随访前三到四周发送给所有患者,随后对所有未参加本次随访的患者进行最多两次电话提醒(IV2)。在确认期间,专门使用IV2来评估电话提醒的最大可能功效。结果:基线期乳腺癌患者未出勤率为18.1% (19/105);在干预期间,这一比例降至13.1% (23/176;p=0.33),后降至6.3%(11/176;p=0.03)。确诊期间,24.4%(42/172)的乳腺癌患者未参加放疗后随访;(不含)IV2后的不出勤率由24.4%(42/172)显著下降至9.3% (16/172);p < 0.001)。在卡方检验中,第一次调用观察到显著性,但第二次调用没有观察到显著性。结论:电话提醒是提高乳腺癌患者放疗后随访依从性的有效手段。在本研究中,电话提醒系统比邮件提醒系统更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信