The Birth of Modern Sanctity: The 1622 Canonizations

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Franco Motta, E. Rai
{"title":"The Birth of Modern Sanctity: The 1622 Canonizations","authors":"Franco Motta, E. Rai","doi":"10.1515/jemc-2022-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We believe that the decision to devote a special issue of the Journal of Early Modern Christianity to the canonizations of 1622, the fourth centenary of which was celebrated recently, needs little explanation. For those studying the history of sainthood, its patterns over the centuries, and the procedural changes allowing for its recognition, indeed, the five canonizations of that year – Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, Teresa of Ávila, Philip Neri, and Isidore the Farmer – constituted a fundamental turning point in the history of the Roman Church. As Ronnie Po-chia Hsia has pointed out in hisTheWorld of Catholic Renewal (2005), a sixth proclamation should ideally be added to the five key cases above, one that preceded them by only a dozen years (1610): that of Charles Borromeo (1538–1584), archbishop of Milan, cardinal, reformer, and champion of the Counter-Reformation and post-Tridentine Catholic renewal. On one hand, for the Counter-Reformation Church – or Tridentine Church – the canonization ceremonyheld in 1622marked the endof a longperiod of crisis dating back a century or so, to the rise of the Protestant Reformation. Needless to say, rejecting the cult of the saints had been one of the central steps in the formation of Protestant doctrines; it was one of several elements that gravitated around the distinction between theword of Scripture as the authentic source of faith, and the concrete reality of secular traditions Protestantismblamed for corrupting the divinemessage. The Council of Trent (1545–1563) reaffirmed the validity of the cult of saints and images, as well as the seven sacraments and means of sacramental mediation exercised by the Church such as indulgences, relics, jubilees and the belief in Purgatory. And yet almost sixty years passed from the date that decree was issued during the Council’s last session to the proclamations of 1622, pointing to the lengthy phase of reflection in which the Church redrew the contours of its relationship with holiness. The first issue sanctity entailed, as we know,was the balance of power between the center and the periphery, as evidenced by the fact that the 1622 canonizations arrived after a complex period of re-drafting the procedures for recognizing sanctity. This reformulation involved establishing the Congregation of Rites (1588) under Sixtus V (1521–1590, r. from 1585) and creating two","PeriodicalId":29688,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","volume":"15 1","pages":"171 - 174"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Modern Christianity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jemc-2022-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We believe that the decision to devote a special issue of the Journal of Early Modern Christianity to the canonizations of 1622, the fourth centenary of which was celebrated recently, needs little explanation. For those studying the history of sainthood, its patterns over the centuries, and the procedural changes allowing for its recognition, indeed, the five canonizations of that year – Ignatius of Loyola, Francis Xavier, Teresa of Ávila, Philip Neri, and Isidore the Farmer – constituted a fundamental turning point in the history of the Roman Church. As Ronnie Po-chia Hsia has pointed out in hisTheWorld of Catholic Renewal (2005), a sixth proclamation should ideally be added to the five key cases above, one that preceded them by only a dozen years (1610): that of Charles Borromeo (1538–1584), archbishop of Milan, cardinal, reformer, and champion of the Counter-Reformation and post-Tridentine Catholic renewal. On one hand, for the Counter-Reformation Church – or Tridentine Church – the canonization ceremonyheld in 1622marked the endof a longperiod of crisis dating back a century or so, to the rise of the Protestant Reformation. Needless to say, rejecting the cult of the saints had been one of the central steps in the formation of Protestant doctrines; it was one of several elements that gravitated around the distinction between theword of Scripture as the authentic source of faith, and the concrete reality of secular traditions Protestantismblamed for corrupting the divinemessage. The Council of Trent (1545–1563) reaffirmed the validity of the cult of saints and images, as well as the seven sacraments and means of sacramental mediation exercised by the Church such as indulgences, relics, jubilees and the belief in Purgatory. And yet almost sixty years passed from the date that decree was issued during the Council’s last session to the proclamations of 1622, pointing to the lengthy phase of reflection in which the Church redrew the contours of its relationship with holiness. The first issue sanctity entailed, as we know,was the balance of power between the center and the periphery, as evidenced by the fact that the 1622 canonizations arrived after a complex period of re-drafting the procedures for recognizing sanctity. This reformulation involved establishing the Congregation of Rites (1588) under Sixtus V (1521–1590, r. from 1585) and creating two
现代神圣的诞生:1622年的封圣
我们认为,决定用《早期现代基督教杂志》(Journal of Early Modern Christianity)的特刊来报道1622年的封圣事件(最近刚刚庆祝了1622年封圣事件的第四个百年纪念)不需要什么解释。对于那些研究圣徒历史的人来说,几个世纪以来的模式,以及允许其认可的程序变化,确实,那一年的五次封圣——罗耀拉的依纳爵、弗朗西斯·泽维尔、Ávila的特蕾莎、菲利普·内里和农民伊西多尔——构成了罗马教会历史上的一个根本转折点。正如Ronnie Po-chia Hsia在他的《天主教复兴的世界》(2005)中指出的那样,理想情况下,应该在上面的五个关键案例中加上第六项宣言,即在他们之前仅仅十几年(1610)的宣言:查尔斯博罗梅奥(1538-1584),米兰大主教,红衣主教,改革者,反宗教改革和后特伦丁天主教复兴的冠军。一方面,对反宗教改革教会(或称特伦丁教会)来说,1622年举行的封圣仪式标志着一个世纪以来新教改革兴起所带来的长期危机的结束。不用说,拒绝对圣徒的崇拜是新教教义形成的核心步骤之一;圣经是信仰的真正来源,而世俗传统的具体现实则被指责为破坏了神的信息,这是围绕这两者之间的区别产生的几个因素之一。天特会议(1545-1563)重申了对圣徒和圣像的崇拜,以及七件圣事和教会施行的圣事调解手段的有效性,如赎罪券、圣物、禧年和对炼狱的信仰。然而,从大公会议最后一届会议颁布法令到1622年的公告,已经过去了近60年,这段漫长的反思阶段,教会重新描绘了其与圣洁关系的轮廓。我们知道,神圣性所涉及的第一个问题,是中心和边缘之间的权力平衡,1622年的封圣是在重新起草承认神圣性的程序的复杂时期之后实现的。这一改革包括在西克斯图斯五世(1521-1590,从1585年开始)领导下建立礼仪部(1588年),并创建两个
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信