South Africa needs a hydrological soil map: a case study from the upper uMngeni catchment

IF 1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 WATER RESOURCES
JJ van Tol, GM van Zijl
{"title":"South Africa needs a hydrological soil map: a case study from the upper uMngeni catchment","authors":"JJ van Tol, GM van Zijl","doi":"10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i4.3977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate hydrological modelling to evaluate the impacts of climate and land use change on water resources is pivotal to sustainable management. Soil information is an important input in hydrological models but is often not available at adequate scale with appropriate attributes for direct parameterisation of the models. In this study, conducted in three quaternary catchments in the midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, three different soil information sets were used to configure SWAT+, a revised version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The datasets were: (i) the Land Type database (currently the only soil dataset covering the whole of South Africa), (ii) disaggregation of the Land Type database using digital soil mapping techniques (called DSMART), and (iii) a dataset where DSMART were complemented by field observations and interpretations of the hydropedological behaviour of the soils (DSMART+). Simulated streamflow was compared with measured streamflow at three weirs with long-term measurements, and the impact of the soil datasets on water balance simulations was evaluated. In general, the simulations were acceptable when compared to other studies, but could be improved through calibration and including small reservoirs in the model. The DSMART+ dataset yielded more accurate simulations of streamflow in all three catchments with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies increasing by between 9% and 67% when compared to the Land Type dataset. The value of the improved soil maps is, however, highlighted through the enhanced spatial detail of streamflow generation mechanisms and water balance components. The internal catchment processes are represented more accurately, and we argue that South Africa needs a detailed hydrological soil map for effective water resource management.","PeriodicalId":23623,"journal":{"name":"Water SA","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water SA","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/wsa/2022.v48.i4.3977","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Accurate hydrological modelling to evaluate the impacts of climate and land use change on water resources is pivotal to sustainable management. Soil information is an important input in hydrological models but is often not available at adequate scale with appropriate attributes for direct parameterisation of the models. In this study, conducted in three quaternary catchments in the midlands of KwaZulu-Natal, three different soil information sets were used to configure SWAT+, a revised version of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). The datasets were: (i) the Land Type database (currently the only soil dataset covering the whole of South Africa), (ii) disaggregation of the Land Type database using digital soil mapping techniques (called DSMART), and (iii) a dataset where DSMART were complemented by field observations and interpretations of the hydropedological behaviour of the soils (DSMART+). Simulated streamflow was compared with measured streamflow at three weirs with long-term measurements, and the impact of the soil datasets on water balance simulations was evaluated. In general, the simulations were acceptable when compared to other studies, but could be improved through calibration and including small reservoirs in the model. The DSMART+ dataset yielded more accurate simulations of streamflow in all three catchments with Nash-Sutcliffe efficiencies increasing by between 9% and 67% when compared to the Land Type dataset. The value of the improved soil maps is, however, highlighted through the enhanced spatial detail of streamflow generation mechanisms and water balance components. The internal catchment processes are represented more accurately, and we argue that South Africa needs a detailed hydrological soil map for effective water resource management.
南非需要一份水文土壤地图:uMngeni上游集水区的案例研究
准确的水文模型来评估气候和土地利用变化对水资源的影响是可持续管理的关键。土壤信息是水文模型的一个重要输入,但往往不能在适当的尺度上获得具有适当属性的模型直接参数化。在这项研究中,在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省中部的三个第四系集水区进行了研究,使用了三种不同的土壤信息集来配置SWAT+,这是水土评估工具(SWAT)的修订版。这些数据集是:(i)土地类型数据库(目前唯一覆盖整个南非的土壤数据集),(ii)使用数字土壤制图技术(称为DSMART)对土地类型数据库进行分类,以及(iii) DSMART通过实地观测和土壤水文行为解释补充的数据集(DSMART+)。将模拟流量与实测流量进行了比较,并对土壤数据集对水平衡模拟的影响进行了评价。总的来说,与其他研究相比,模拟是可以接受的,但可以通过校准和在模型中包括小型储层来改进。与Land Type数据集相比,DSMART+数据集对所有三个流域的流量进行了更准确的模拟,Nash-Sutcliffe效率提高了9%至67%。然而,改进后的土壤图的价值通过加强水流产生机制和水平衡成分的空间细节而得到突出体现。内部流域过程更准确地表示,我们认为南非需要一个详细的水文土壤图来有效地管理水资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Water SA
Water SA 环境科学-水资源
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: WaterSA publishes refereed, original work in all branches of water science, technology and engineering. This includes water resources development; the hydrological cycle; surface hydrology; geohydrology and hydrometeorology; limnology; salinisation; treatment and management of municipal and industrial water and wastewater; treatment and disposal of sewage sludge; environmental pollution control; water quality and treatment; aquaculture in terms of its impact on the water resource; agricultural water science; etc. Water SA is the WRC’s accredited scientific journal which contains original research articles and review articles on all aspects of water science, technology, engineering and policy. Water SA has been in publication since 1975 and includes articles from both local and international authors. The journal is issued quarterly (4 editions per year).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信