Following Sextus: Demonstrative Argument in Gorgias’ Peri tou mē ontos

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Peitho Pub Date : 2018-12-13 DOI:10.14746/pea.2018.1.1
Stefania Giombini
{"title":"Following Sextus: Demonstrative Argument in Gorgias’ Peri tou mē ontos","authors":"Stefania Giombini","doi":"10.14746/pea.2018.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The two extant versions of Gorgias’ Peri tou mē ontos (PTMO) have been preserved by an anonymous author (MXG) and by Sextus Empiricus (S.E.). Both versions have been differently interpreted by scholars who examine either the doctrine or the rhetorical-communicational dimen­sion (the first option being dominant). When comparing the PTMO with the rest of Gorgias’ works, the present paper aims to demonstrate that S.E. offers a more precise account of Gorgias’ modus argumentandi. Thus, S.E. shows the following, typical features of Gorgias’ demonstra­tive reasoning: 1) application of demonstrandum and quod erat demon­strandum, 2) continuous employment of reductio ad absurdum and 3) a refined formulation of the principle of non-contradiction (similar to the one in Pal. 25). The MXG, on the other hand, is accurate in the discussion of particular arguments (e.g. the third kephalaion), but presents an interpreter who is more interested in questioning Gorgias rather than doing justice to his thought. Hence, this article concludes that it was S.E., who had the text or at least a relatively accurate summa­ry of the PTMO.","PeriodicalId":36201,"journal":{"name":"Peitho","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peitho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/pea.2018.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The two extant versions of Gorgias’ Peri tou mē ontos (PTMO) have been preserved by an anonymous author (MXG) and by Sextus Empiricus (S.E.). Both versions have been differently interpreted by scholars who examine either the doctrine or the rhetorical-communicational dimen­sion (the first option being dominant). When comparing the PTMO with the rest of Gorgias’ works, the present paper aims to demonstrate that S.E. offers a more precise account of Gorgias’ modus argumentandi. Thus, S.E. shows the following, typical features of Gorgias’ demonstra­tive reasoning: 1) application of demonstrandum and quod erat demon­strandum, 2) continuous employment of reductio ad absurdum and 3) a refined formulation of the principle of non-contradiction (similar to the one in Pal. 25). The MXG, on the other hand, is accurate in the discussion of particular arguments (e.g. the third kephalaion), but presents an interpreter who is more interested in questioning Gorgias rather than doing justice to his thought. Hence, this article concludes that it was S.E., who had the text or at least a relatively accurate summa­ry of the PTMO.
继塞克斯图斯之后:高尔吉亚的《我的生命》中的论证论证
现存的两个版本的《高尔吉亚的生命》(PTMO)由一位匿名作者(MXG)和塞克斯图斯·恩皮里库斯(S.E.)保存。学者们对这两个版本有不同的解释,他们从理论或修辞-交际的角度进行研究(第一种选择占主导地位)。当将《PTMO》与戈尔吉亚的其他作品进行比较时,本文旨在证明S.E.对戈尔吉亚的论证方式提供了更精确的描述。因此,S.E.表现出以下戈尔吉亚论证推理的典型特征:1)论证和论证的运用,2)持续运用反证法,3)非矛盾原则的精炼表述(类似于Pal. 25)。另一方面,MXG在特定论点的讨论中是准确的(例如第三个kephalaion),但呈现出一个对质疑戈尔吉亚更感兴趣的诠释者,而不是公正地对待他的思想。因此,本文的结论是,是s.e.掌握了PTMO的文本,或者至少是相对准确的总结。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Peitho
Peitho Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信