ἀρχὴ τῆς θαλάττης - ἀρχὴ τῶν κακῶν? Kompetitive Motivationen bei Thukydides, Ps.-Xenophon und Isokrates

Evangelos Alexiou
{"title":"ἀρχὴ τῆς θαλάττης - ἀρχὴ τῶν κακῶν? Kompetitive Motivationen bei Thukydides, Ps.-Xenophon und Isokrates","authors":"Evangelos Alexiou","doi":"10.13135/2039-4985/1928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After observing that the thalassocracy was a key point of political consideration in the 5th and 4th centuries B.C., this article focuses on the moral interplay between Thucydides, Ps.-Xenophon and Isocrates. A proper analysis of the semantics of greed, ambition and power in an intertextual dialogue and from the sea-hegemony perspective attempts to show how competitive values of time , deos and ophelia have influenced the political thinking in the 5th and 4th centuries B.C. and how Isocrates applies a moral approach in pursuing the success and in combining competitive and cooperative values, which he defines as „just greed”. The special weight is laid by Isocrates instead of deos on the combination of virtue and eunoia as far as success in foreign politics is concerned, but he does not condemn entirely the political realism of Thucydides.","PeriodicalId":30377,"journal":{"name":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","volume":"25 1","pages":"405-421"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historika Studi di Storia Greca e Romana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2039-4985/1928","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

After observing that the thalassocracy was a key point of political consideration in the 5th and 4th centuries B.C., this article focuses on the moral interplay between Thucydides, Ps.-Xenophon and Isocrates. A proper analysis of the semantics of greed, ambition and power in an intertextual dialogue and from the sea-hegemony perspective attempts to show how competitive values of time , deos and ophelia have influenced the political thinking in the 5th and 4th centuries B.C. and how Isocrates applies a moral approach in pursuing the success and in combining competitive and cooperative values, which he defines as „just greed”. The special weight is laid by Isocrates instead of deos on the combination of virtue and eunoia as far as success in foreign politics is concerned, but he does not condemn entirely the political realism of Thucydides.
在观察到地中海联盟是公元前5世纪和4世纪政治考虑的关键点之后,本文将重点放在修昔底德、色诺芬和伊索克拉底之间的道德相互作用上。从海上霸权的角度对互文对话中的贪婪、野心和权力的语义进行适当的分析,试图展示时间、deos和ophelia的竞争价值观如何影响公元前5世纪和4世纪的政治思想,以及伊索克拉底如何运用道德方法追求成功,并将竞争与合作的价值观结合起来,他将其定义为“只是贪婪”。伊索克拉底,而不是deos,特别重视美德和美乐的结合,就外交政治的成功而言,但他并没有完全谴责修昔底德的政治现实主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信