Patterns of Routine Antenatal Laboratory Test Results at Booking in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Southeast Nigeria

Innocent IgwebuezeOkafor, Boniface UwaezuokeOdugu, E. Ndibuagu
{"title":"Patterns of Routine Antenatal Laboratory Test Results at Booking in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital, Enugu, Southeast Nigeria","authors":"Innocent IgwebuezeOkafor, Boniface UwaezuokeOdugu, E. Ndibuagu","doi":"10.9790/3013-0705014148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the patterns of routine antenatal care laboratory test results at booking in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, and to review the literature on the subject. Methods: The registers for the results of routine laboratory tests at booking in ESUTH, Enugu were reviewed from April 1, 2014 to August 31, 2016. Data on age, blood group, rhesus status, hemoglobin genotype, packed cell volume; human immunodeficiency virus screening (HIV), venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) tests at booking were collected and analyzed with Excel 2007 software. The results were presented in tables, percentages and graphs. Results: A total of 5293 mothers were tested; 2706 (51.12%) and 2500 (47.23%) of them were of ages <30 and 30-40 years respectively (Table 1). Table 2 showed the commonest blood group was ‘O’ 3062(57.85%). Most of the mothers 4811(90.89%) were Rhesus D positive while 482(9.11%) of them were negative. Hemoglobin genotype results were: AA 4066(76.82%), AS 1217(22.99%), and SS 8(0.15%). About 3819(72.15%) had packed cell volume of 31% and above. Table 3 revealed 232(4.83%) women tested positive to HIV, but 17(0.32%) only were new cases. Twenty eight (0.53%) women were reactive to VDRL while 166(3.14%) tested positive to HBsAg test. Many women 5061(95.62%) and 5127(96.86%) tested negative to HIV and HBsAg tests respectively. Conclusion: Most women are young (<40 years), have blood group O rhesus D positive, hemoglobin AA genotype, and are not anemic at booking. Many women are non-reactive to VDRL, HIV and HBsAg tests; and are vulnerable to infections. The marked reductions on SS genotype, VDRL and HIV new cases in this study have justified the critical preventive role of routine ANC laboratory tests in our current obstetric practice and the need for the continuation of the practice.","PeriodicalId":14540,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"126 1","pages":"41-48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/3013-0705014148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the patterns of routine antenatal care laboratory test results at booking in Enugu State University Teaching Hospital (ESUTH), Enugu, and to review the literature on the subject. Methods: The registers for the results of routine laboratory tests at booking in ESUTH, Enugu were reviewed from April 1, 2014 to August 31, 2016. Data on age, blood group, rhesus status, hemoglobin genotype, packed cell volume; human immunodeficiency virus screening (HIV), venereal disease research laboratory (VDRL) and hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) tests at booking were collected and analyzed with Excel 2007 software. The results were presented in tables, percentages and graphs. Results: A total of 5293 mothers were tested; 2706 (51.12%) and 2500 (47.23%) of them were of ages <30 and 30-40 years respectively (Table 1). Table 2 showed the commonest blood group was ‘O’ 3062(57.85%). Most of the mothers 4811(90.89%) were Rhesus D positive while 482(9.11%) of them were negative. Hemoglobin genotype results were: AA 4066(76.82%), AS 1217(22.99%), and SS 8(0.15%). About 3819(72.15%) had packed cell volume of 31% and above. Table 3 revealed 232(4.83%) women tested positive to HIV, but 17(0.32%) only were new cases. Twenty eight (0.53%) women were reactive to VDRL while 166(3.14%) tested positive to HBsAg test. Many women 5061(95.62%) and 5127(96.86%) tested negative to HIV and HBsAg tests respectively. Conclusion: Most women are young (<40 years), have blood group O rhesus D positive, hemoglobin AA genotype, and are not anemic at booking. Many women are non-reactive to VDRL, HIV and HBsAg tests; and are vulnerable to infections. The marked reductions on SS genotype, VDRL and HIV new cases in this study have justified the critical preventive role of routine ANC laboratory tests in our current obstetric practice and the need for the continuation of the practice.
尼日利亚东南部埃努古埃努古州立大学教学医院常规产前实验室检查结果模式
目的:确定埃努古州埃努古州立大学教学医院(ESUTH)预约时常规产前保健实验室检查结果的模式,并回顾有关该主题的文献。方法:对2014年4月1日至2016年8月31日埃努古ESUTH门诊常规化验结果登记资料进行分析。年龄、血型、恒河状态、血红蛋白基因型、堆积细胞体积数据;收集预约时人类免疫缺陷病毒筛查(HIV)、性病研究实验室(VDRL)和乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)检测结果,用Excel 2007软件进行分析。结果以表格、百分比和图表的形式呈现。结果:共检测5293名母亲;其中年龄<30岁的2706人(51.12%),30-40岁的2500人(47.23%)(表1)。表2显示最常见的血型为O型3062人(57.85%)。rh阳性母亲4811例(90.89%),rh阴性母亲482例(9.11%)。血红蛋白基因型分别为AA 4066(76.82%)、AS 1217(22.99%)、SS 8(0.15%)。3819株(72.15%)细胞填充体积在31%及以上。表3显示232名(4.83%)妇女艾滋病毒检测呈阳性,但只有17名(0.32%)是新病例。VDRL阳性28例(0.53%),HBsAg阳性166例(3.14%)。5061名妇女(95.62%)和5127名妇女(96.86%)的HIV和HBsAg检测结果分别为阴性。结论:女性多为年轻(<40岁),O型血恒河D阳性,血红蛋白AA基因型,预约时无贫血。许多妇女对VDRL、艾滋病毒和HBsAg检测无反应;而且很容易受到感染。这项研究中SS基因型、VDRL和艾滋病毒新病例的显著减少证明了常规ANC实验室检查在我们目前的产科实践中的关键预防作用,以及继续这种做法的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信